Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

3.3L Hybrid Stroker Engine Dimensions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2014, 02:32 PM
  #1  
Will Feather
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Will Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upton, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3.3L Hybrid Stroker Engine Build

Hey guys, been learning alot from Shawn and Sid's Hybrid stoker builds. Thinking about doing one myself as I have plenty of parts sitting around. I did some quick calculations on a 95mm offset ground 3.0 crank in a 3.0 block. (Have a full S2 motor on the stand).

Punched into the Eagle engine calculator and this is what I got.



These calculations are based on using a 2.7 head. Using the 16V head with a chamber volume of 41cc raised the compression ratio up to around 9.85. Piston used here would be a JE "4.125. (Sleeve size may be costly)

Rod ratio is less than ideal (thus rod angle), and there is still clearance left at the deck.

Looking for some more knowledgeable insight here, trying to learn as much as I can! If you guys were to base a hybrid stoker off a 3.0 block, how would you do it?

Last edited by Will Feather; 01-05-2015 at 11:19 PM. Reason: Changed Title - will use this thread to track the progression of the motor build
Old 11-19-2014, 03:34 PM
  #2  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Had a long reply typed and lost it.

It's pretty simple though, use flanged ductile iron sleeves. Easily available.

Either leave the piston in the hole some (my choice) in essence you are just adding to the combustion chamber volume, or try to create a piston with a deep enough dish to accommodate the low ratio. Not easy with a 16 v.

The rod ratio works fine with the limited rpm capability of this oiling sysyem.
Old 11-19-2014, 03:36 PM
  #3  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

If you stay 8v, the parts are off the shelf.

4.155 sbc low compression pistons.
Old 11-19-2014, 03:51 PM
  #4  
Will Feather
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Will Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upton, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
Had a long reply typed and lost it.

It's pretty simple though, use flanged ductile iron sleeves. Easily available.

Either leave the piston in the hole some (my choice) in essence you are just adding to the combustion chamber volume, or try to create a piston with a deep enough dish to accommodate the low ratio. Not easy with a 16 v.
When you say leave the piston in the hole some, you are saying you would leave the clearance at the deck height, to allow for added combustion chamber volume?

A custom piston would be out of the question for me at least. How do guys utilize the 16V head with its chamber volume. (Excuse my ignorance, don't know what I don't know!)

Originally Posted by blown 944
If you stay 8v, the parts are off the shelf.

4.155 sbc low compression pistons.
I do like your idea of running 4.155 pistons, ups the displacement to 3.32 rather than 3.28.
Old 11-19-2014, 04:03 PM
  #5  
Will Feather
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Will Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upton, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Calculator reconfigured using a 4.155 piston, Comp Ht 1.125, -16cc dome. Would be not interference correct?


Old 11-19-2014, 04:16 PM
  #6  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Will Feather
Calculator reconfigured using a 4.155 piston, Comp Ht 1.125, -16cc dome. Would be not interference correct?


Correct.
Old 11-19-2014, 05:20 PM
  #7  
Will Feather
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Will Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upton, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sid, got a common go to for the sleeves?
Old 11-19-2014, 06:01 PM
  #8  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'll ask my machinist who he used on the last couple.
Old 11-19-2014, 08:34 PM
  #9  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Non-interference will depend on the valve size. If you are using a 2.7 head, intake will be 48mm and it will be close. Definitely clay the valves to verify.

Also, I believe the standard Cometic HG is 0.04". What is the reason for the 0.030"?

Rod ratio should be a non-issue. The RR is the same as my build and it has been fine. I also talked to Harry about it and it did not believe it to be an issue.
Old 11-19-2014, 08:53 PM
  #10  
Will Feather
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Will Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upton, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by refresh951
Also, I believe the standard Cometic HG is 0.04". What is the reason for the 0.030"?
Thanks Shawn, your are correct on the HG, just an oversight on my part.

Shawn, do you know the manufacturer of your sleeves?
Old 11-19-2014, 09:01 PM
  #11  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Will Feather
Thanks Shawn, your are correct on the HG, just an oversight on my part.

Shawn, do you know the manufacturer of your sleeves?
The manufacturer of the sleeves is really the wrong question IMO. You need to find a machinist who sleeves aluminum blocks with ductile iron sleeves on a regular basis. They are not uncommon. Then he will tell you what sleeves you need to use and he will order and install them. Finding the "right machinist" is very important.
Old 11-19-2014, 09:10 PM
  #12  
Will Feather
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Will Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upton, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by refresh951
Finding the "right machinist" is very important.
I couldn't agree with you more. And this seems like it will be my biggest hurdle. I have contacted quite a few shops, and no one will offset grind. I have more digging to do. May have the send my crank down to you..

Anyone have any leads for a New England shop with such experience?
Old 11-19-2014, 09:20 PM
  #13  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Will Feather
I couldn't agree with you more. And this seems like it will be my biggest hurdle. I have contacted quite a few shops, and no one will offset grind. I have more digging to do. May have the send my crank down to you..

Anyone have any leads for a New England shop with such experience?

Let me know if you cannot find someone and will help through my machinist. Be nice if you can find a local guy.
Old 11-19-2014, 10:46 PM
  #14  
Will Feather
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Will Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Upton, Massachusetts
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How do you guys feel this set up would perform utilizing a 2.7 head.

I feel the displacement may be reaching the upper efficiency of the head, would 3.3 be overkill?
Old 11-19-2014, 11:27 PM
  #15  
ilikemy944
Going with the pack
is quite monotonous.
Rennlist Member
 
ilikemy944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 3,129
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is a great thread, parts in my garage include 3L crank, 3L block and 2.7L head...


Quick Reply: 3.3L Hybrid Stroker Engine Dimensions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:21 AM.