Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

MAF vs. Standalone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2014, 08:03 PM
  #61  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,250
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by azbanks
Just so we don't derail this thread any further, I'll have my Nigerian business manager contact you for the details.
Great, I have a large amount of money in an account in Nigeria.
Old 01-01-2015, 02:32 PM
  #62  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,250
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Revisiting this topic, if the 944 standalone setups came with more than just a startup map I'd be much more inclined to go for one, if I read it right the ViPec QuickTune software can map an engine in under 30 mins on a dyno, if that's the case is it worth learning how to programme it, and spending hours fine tuning it yourself ?
Old 01-01-2015, 03:48 PM
  #63  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Startup map in my case means that it is tuned to run on stock engine.

It is not possible to provide good running maps for various setups other than just mild mods like bigger injectors etc. Not a single good tuner will take the responsibility of promising that the map will wotk on a turbocharged car safely if the fuel is not tuned well! Ignition can be made safe (and usually with lost power), but fuel is affected by every small detail and it is mandatory to tune it.

For example VEMS has Live VE analyser which tunes VE map accoridng to AFR target table, you just need to drive around and burn the config afterwards.
Old 01-01-2015, 04:37 PM
  #64  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,250
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raceboy
Startup map in my case means that it is tuned to run on stock engine.
VEMS has Live VE analyser which tunes VE map accoridng to AFR target table, you just need to drive around and burn the config afterwards.
A couple of vendors have plenty of 944 experience with their standalone setups so I would have thought they could get pretty close if given the spec of a customers engine, letting the software do the fine tuning ? If I go the standalone route I'd like to buy the sensors and injectors etc from the same company with a compatible map installed.
Old 01-01-2015, 05:06 PM
  #65  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

It is not just the sensors and injectors. Most of the sensors will remain stock and 90% of MAP sensors are inside the ECU.
Engine VE changes even with the wear over time and MAP is not compensating for it unless the system has closed loop EGO control. With MAF it is a bit more forgiving but it has its own drawbacks.

You have to realise that with standalone, there is no one who would offer you an ECU with other parts and much more power over what you have now with your current engine. Even the exhaust matters.

What I do not get is that when people are buying a standalone, why are they so afraid of going to some tuner and just let them tune the car? With a good standalone, tuning the engine if it already runs, takes maximum two hours. It is much much less than trying to burn chips with each tune and getting the tune right which means it is also cheaper. In Estonia for example, tuning a turbocharged car that is running on startup MAP costs ~300 euros, is that too much? It is the same cost as around two tanks of gas in UK..

I have been in Togo, West Africa to tune a turbocharged BMW and in many European countries too...
Old 01-01-2015, 05:36 PM
  #66  
1987Porsche944WithRealLongName
Racer
 
1987Porsche944WithRealLongName's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nvm

Last edited by 1987Porsche944WithRealLongName; 01-02-2015 at 01:17 AM.
Old 01-01-2015, 05:59 PM
  #67  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,250
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raceboy

What I do not get is that when people are buying a standalone, why are they so afraid of going to some tuner and just let them tune the car? With a good standalone, tuning the engine if it already runs, takes maximum two hours. It is much much less than trying to burn chips with each tune and getting the tune right which means it is also cheaper. In Estonia for example, tuning a turbocharged car that is running on startup MAP costs ~300 euros, is that too much? It is the same cost as around two tanks of gas in UK..

.
No 300 euros is not to much. You make it sound quite straight forward which seems a no brainer to choose standalone over a piggyback. Though there are people selling standalone with looms, injectors, coils etc. My AFM is getting tired and I don't want to buy another, so I'm looking at options for my present 2.5 and a 3.0 in the not to distant future.



Quick Reply: MAF vs. Standalone



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:36 PM.