Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Early steel control arm as a mechanical fuse

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2013, 10:27 PM
  #1  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,665
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default Early steel control arm as a mechanical fuse

I have been running early steel control arms on my '86 951 for almost 2 seasons now, as I broke a factory aluminum arm at Laguna Seca in the past.

I have had no issues until this past weekend when I hit a large "pothole" or missing chunk of pavement to the inside of a curb at Streets of Willow. I was braking hard, traveling about 40-50 MPH, and as shown in the picture below, the right front control arm took the brunt of the impact. I was above to limp the remainder of the lap back to the paddock.

Since I always carry a spare control arm and ball joint ($25 and $12, respectively), I was able to swap out the control arm between sessions. I even had time to eat lunch and instruct my student before my next run. Nothing else was bent or damaged, and I was back on track for the next session and for the rest of the weekend with the car handling normally.

The incident made me wonder what would have happened if I had the same impact with either a factory aluminum arm, or one of the various stronger aftermarket arms out there. I am willing to bet that a factory aluminum arm would have broken, and most of the aftermarket arms would have also bent, at least slightly, and would be very expensive to replace. I also wonder if a much stiffer arm would have possibly shifted the force of the impact to something else, like a ball joint, which could have damaged a lot more. I feel that the sheet metal steel arms will bend, but not break, which could save the front subframe from shifting if a front corner were to hit a tire wall, for example.

The point of this post is to gather the collective wisdom of the group and see if my thoughts are valid. I would like to hear the experience of those of you who have raced/tracked these cars for longer than I have, and any stories about damaged/bent control arms and ball joints.

I have run the early steel arms for 2 seasons worth of track events and daily driving on the horrible roads of Santa Barbara, with a large Tarett front sway bar twisting them the entire time (the drop links mount on the same plane as the ball joints and forward bushings), and they have held up well through this. Of course, this is only applicable to those of us with '86 early offset arms, but food for thought nonetheless.
Attached Images  
Old 02-27-2013, 12:38 AM
  #2  
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
eclou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 7,004
Received 1,165 Likes on 574 Posts
Default

I run the Marcus Blazsak reinforced steel arms. They have held up quite well over 10 sporadic years of track usage
Old 02-27-2013, 01:16 AM
  #3  
chrenan
Three Wheelin'
 
chrenan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,476
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eclou
I run the Marcus Blazsak reinforced steel arms. They have held up quite well over 10 sporadic years of track usage
Same here. I like that they take early ball joints too.
Old 02-27-2013, 05:37 AM
  #4  
FRporscheman
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
FRporscheman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Francisco Area
Posts: 11,014
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I wish someone would modify the early steel arm setup to work on a late suspension. I'm sure there's a cheap ball joint out there with the right size pin, and all it would take is adding some length to the part that mounts to the control arm.
Old 02-27-2013, 05:42 AM
  #5  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FRporscheman
I wish someone would modify the early steel arm setup to work on a late suspension. I'm sure there's a cheap ball joint out there with the right size pin, and all it would take is adding some length to the part that mounts to the control arm.
It should not be too hard to produce them yourselves. You just have to think a bit about how to produce them!
Old 02-27-2013, 11:51 AM
  #6  
FrenchToast
Three Wheelin'
 
FrenchToast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FRporscheman
I wish someone would modify the early steel arm setup to work on a late suspension. I'm sure there's a cheap ball joint out there with the right size pin, and all it would take is adding some length to the part that mounts to the control arm.
Blaszak makes these.

Take care,
Old 02-27-2013, 12:00 PM
  #7  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FrenchToast
Blaszak makes these.

Take care,
Wauw.. Those look really simple! Anyone with a welder could easily produce them in their garage!
Old 02-27-2013, 12:01 PM
  #8  
PorscheDoc
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor
 
PorscheDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Under Your Car
Posts: 8,058
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Box those puppies for track use! Very easy for anyone with a welder.
Old 02-27-2013, 03:36 PM
  #9  
86 951 Driver
Race Car
 
86 951 Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 3,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Droops83
I have been running early steel control arms on my '86 951 for almost 2 seasons now, as I broke a factory aluminum arm at Laguna Seca in the past.

I have had no issues until this past weekend when I hit a large "pothole" or missing chunk of pavement to the inside of a curb at Streets of Willow. I was braking hard, traveling about 40-50 MPH, and as shown in the picture below, the right front control arm took the brunt of the impact. I was above to limp the remainder of the lap back to the paddock.

Since I always carry a spare control arm and ball joint ($25 and $12, respectively), I was able to swap out the control arm between sessions. I even had time to eat lunch and instruct my student before my next run. Nothing else was bent or damaged, and I was back on track for the next session and for the rest of the weekend with the car handling normally.

The incident made me wonder what would have happened if I had the same impact with either a factory aluminum arm, or one of the various stronger aftermarket arms out there. I am willing to bet that a factory aluminum arm would have broken, and most of the aftermarket arms would have also bent, at least slightly, and would be very expensive to replace. I also wonder if a much stiffer arm would have possibly shifted the force of the impact to something else, like a ball joint, which could have damaged a lot more. I feel that the sheet metal steel arms will bend, but not break, which could save the front subframe from shifting if a front corner were to hit a tire wall, for example.

The point of this post is to gather the collective wisdom of the group and see if my thoughts are valid. I would like to hear the experience of those of you who have raced/tracked these cars for longer than I have, and any stories about damaged/bent control arms and ball joints.

I have run the early steel arms for 2 seasons worth of track events and daily driving on the horrible roads of Santa Barbara, with a large Tarett front sway bar twisting them the entire time (the drop links mount on the same plane as the ball joints and forward bushings), and they have held up well through this. Of course, this is only applicable to those of us with '86 early offset arms, but food for thought nonetheless.
Originally Posted by robstah
I converted to the steel arms for the very reasons you posted.

I do worry for people running rebuilt aluminum arms. Aluminum does fatigue after so much usage. Porsche designed the aluminum arms not to have replaceable ball-joints and bushings for that very reason.
What do you run for a caster block then? I know the 968 Caster blocks are preferred on the aluminum arms, but I heard they will not work with steel arms.
Old 02-27-2013, 03:38 PM
  #10  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dutch944
It should not be too hard to produce them yourselves. You just have to think a bit about how to produce them!
How about a 1/4 or 3/8 steel plate cut to the right shape, with 'added lightness' and spherical bearings?
Old 02-27-2013, 05:15 PM
  #11  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,665
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorscheDoc
Box those puppies for track use! Very easy for anyone with a welder.
Doc, I always hear that many Spec 944 guys do this (I am also building a Spec 944 car that will use the steel arms). This makes a lot of sense, but I think that even a reinforced arm would have bent with the impact that I gave it, and I still would have needed to replace it.

I will certainly experiment with reinforcing these arms, but as I said in the first post, I have run the same pair of arms for almost 2 years with hard track use and daily driving, all with a big sway bar. I inspect them regularly and they have shown no signs of bending or flexing. I will say that I only use Lemforder arms, which are the only ones that the Tarett sway bar adapter blocks fit onto. They are certainly higher quality than the other brands I looked at.

Have you or any of your customers had bad experiences with unmodified steel arms on the track? If so I would like to hear about them, so that I can make an informed decision for the future.

Thanks for the replies.
Old 02-27-2013, 05:42 PM
  #12  
Dutch944
Three Wheelin'
 
Dutch944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hollandaaaa
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
How about a 1/4 or 3/8 steel plate cut to the right shape, with 'added lightness' and spherical bearings?
I like the part of spherical lightness, but i would still make it out of piping or ehmm.. Dont know the english word for "square pipe". I would also try to get them in such a way that you can fit any type of caster block on them; i've seen plenty of these made but without the ability to maintain the standard caster blocks. Not every 944 driver wants a "solid" car..

When you check all of these parts and the time needed.. I would say that anyone would be able to produce them for about 150 a piece.. That's a lot less than what most control arms go for!
Old 02-27-2013, 05:45 PM
  #13  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,665
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 86 951 Driver
What do you run for a caster block then? I know the 968 Caster blocks are preferred on the aluminum arms, but I heard they will not work with steel arms.
You will need early 944 rear bushing/caster block brackets (part # 477.407.169, get them used from a salvage yard). The only performance rear bushings that I have seen available are the red polyurethene Weltmeister bushings, and this is what all of the 944 Spec guys have used for years. They work well, but can get torn up fairly quickly with hard track use (I have replaced mine twice so far). Luckily they are cheap at less than $20 each and easy to replace.

Use the Racer's Edge delrin bushings for the front. You will also need adapter brackets for the front sway bar that you are using. You can get the factory brackets if you run the stock front sway bar (part # 944.343.735.01). They mount underneath the arm instead of on top like the brackets on the aluminum arms, and you will have to hone out the bushings so the larger Turbo sway bar ends fit. I wouldn't recommend running a 30MM 968 M030 bar, as the geometry won't be correct and it will bind and cause lots of understeer (in fact I don't like this bar for aluminum bars either. Get an adjustable front sway bar if you can
Old 02-27-2013, 06:52 PM
  #14  
86 951 Driver
Race Car
 
86 951 Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 3,638
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by robstah
The early slotted style with original bushings. I like to get as much caster as I can.
Originally Posted by Droops83
You will need early 944 rear bushing/caster block brackets (part # 477.407.169, get them used from a salvage yard). The only performance rear bushings that I have seen available are the red polyurethene Weltmeister bushings, and this is what all of the 944 Spec guys have used for years. They work well, but can get torn up fairly quickly with hard track use (I have replaced mine twice so far). Luckily they are cheap at less than $20 each and easy to replace.

Use the Racer's Edge delrin bushings for the front. You will also need adapter brackets for the front sway bar that you are using. You can get the factory brackets if you run the stock front sway bar (part # 944.343.735.01). They mount underneath the arm instead of on top like the brackets on the aluminum arms, and you will have to hone out the bushings so the larger Turbo sway bar ends fit. I wouldn't recommend running a 30MM 968 M030 bar, as the geometry won't be correct and it will bind and cause lots of understeer (in fact I don't like this bar for aluminum bars either. Get an adjustable front sway bar if you can
That is my one rub is the whole swaybar mount for the early style arms. I like the idea of replacing my aluminum arms with steel because of the cost factor. Ball joints are easily replaced, and the actual arms are cheap too.

I will be doing my suspension refresh this spring(been 2 years in the making) and I have the choice of rebuilding my current arms or converting to steel. New aluminum arms are just too damn expensive.
Old 02-27-2013, 08:59 PM
  #15  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

I don't know about functional difference between early/late sway bar end mounts but I got a 25.5 bar in the early bushings by drilling it out a little


Quick Reply: Early steel control arm as a mechanical fuse



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:47 PM.