#1 thing about my build.. NON INTERFERENCE
#19
Rennlist Member
#20
Three Wheelin'
How many engines out there are just waiting for a instant valve bending, piston denting, $20 idler pulley bearing to disintegrate?
I have seen the internals of a cambelt broken Ducati 4v desmo engine.
Why do they make these engines when a design change can avoid $1000's with maybe a small reduction in efficiency?
I have seen the internals of a cambelt broken Ducati 4v desmo engine.
Why do they make these engines when a design change can avoid $1000's with maybe a small reduction in efficiency?
The 951, being a low-compression '80s turbo engine, has enough of a dish in the piston to the point that it is barely an interference engine. I have had 2 different customers luck out in that their 951 timing belts broke at a low enough RPM to prevent and bent valves. All we had to do was replace the belts/rollers and they were back on the road. Most haven't been so lucky, and if the breakage happens at higher RPMs you are guaranteed to bend valves. The higher-compression 944 NA engines will bend valves even if the belt breaks on startup.
I know that it is possible to have a strange parts failure, but the best we can do is keep on top of timing belt maintenance and replace the rollers/tensioner parts as necessary every time, no matter what engine we are talking about.
#21
Rennlist Member
Sid -- do you know if Refresh's motor (which used your design) is also non-interference? I seem to recall your build had some extra goodies from a machining standpoint; not sure if Refresh's motor also had some of that fun stuff.
#22
Rennlist Member
Nice work Sid.
#24
Rennlist Member
#25
Race Car
Thread Starter
Yeah mine is a litle different than Josh's. I took another route regarding piston deck height and I still have stock valve size too.
I am really glad I went this route as it makes a lot of power, can use an edgy tune, and now has passed the broken belt test.
I just ran it tonight and went 125-126 on crap radials with a headwind so it's still in fine shape
I love this engine more all the time....
I won't build an interference engine ever again.
I am really glad I went this route as it makes a lot of power, can use an edgy tune, and now has passed the broken belt test.
I just ran it tonight and went 125-126 on crap radials with a headwind so it's still in fine shape
I love this engine more all the time....
I won't build an interference engine ever again.
#27
Drifting
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bangkok, Thailand, Milpitas, CA & Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
Very nice engineering work Sid! Many people feel that how much one knows makes him a genius, I feel it better illustrates what ones accomplishes with that learned knowledge!