Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Who's had experience with Fibreglass panels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2012, 10:29 AM
  #16  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 99 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I'm thinking this time around of just going back to what I had. Quicker, easier, cheaper etc...
I'm still curious about how much extra load going really widebody puts on the wheel bearings with spacers and / or deep dish wheels?
Old 05-07-2012, 03:29 PM
  #17  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I had ball joints go 3 times on my 18" wheels with semi slicks and 1" spacers and lowered on M030.

Not sure if everyone had that issue.
Old 05-07-2012, 03:41 PM
  #18  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NZ951
I had ball joints go 3 times on my 18" wheels with semi slicks and 1" spacers and lowered on M030.

Not sure if everyone had that issue.
What does "ball joints go" mean?

TonyG
Old 05-07-2012, 03:43 PM
  #19  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
I'm thinking this time around of just going back to what I had. Quicker, easier, cheaper etc...
I'm still curious about how much extra load going really widebody puts on the wheel bearings with spacers and / or deep dish wheels?
You'll be fine.

While I don't have a wide body (yet), I know lots of people that do without problems.

Also, are you starting off with early or late suspension?

TonyG
Old 05-07-2012, 05:01 PM
  #20  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
What does "ball joints go" mean?

TonyG
I cant recall the nature of the break it was a few years ago now, but I recall doing them twice and the guy after me that bought it had to do them once...
Old 05-07-2012, 05:34 PM
  #21  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,926
Received 99 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Late suspension in an early car.
Old 05-07-2012, 11:10 PM
  #22  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NZ951
I cant recall the nature of the break it was a few years ago now, but I recall doing them twice and the guy after me that bought it had to do them once...
Well... if you broke a ball joint you'd never forget what that felt like because both of your front wheels wouldn't be pointing in the same direction. That said... if you had to "do them twice", can only mean that you had play and had to rebuild them.

And yes... there are rebuild kits available. They all suck.

I would never race on a rebuilt factory control arm.

And FWIW, I've been racing for many years on my bone stock 968 control arms with sticky 315 front tires with zero problems. No play in the ball joints after several years.

The only way to properly do the job is to either replace the control arm with a new one, or buy an aftermarket control arm. And ... the reason I don't use aftermarket control arms... as Patrick might be finding out... is that they are too strong. They will screw up the chassis long before they break. If I hit something hard like Patrick did... I'd rather have the control arm break than tweak the mounting points.

TonyG
Old 05-08-2012, 03:50 AM
  #23  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Oh they never broke, just became loose. I was thinking it was more the diameter or the wheel circumference than the width that was playing with geometry.
Old 05-08-2012, 04:00 AM
  #24  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NZ951
Oh they never broke, just became loose. I was thinking it was more the diameter or the wheel circumference than the width that was playing with geometry.
The differences in tire diameter have almost no affect on the forces placed on the ball cup as the difference between 17" and 18" rims is for the most part negated due to the face that the overall dimension of the tire/rim combo is close to the same.

The issue is the force placed on the ball cup. And that's a direct result of how much force the tire can generate. That force is primarily due to braking forces, then cornering forces.

I run huge brakes on a 315 sticky tire. And I race it hard. After three seasons, you can take my car on a lift and try to move the wheel. There is no play.

I don't know why the factory ball joint works so well compared to any of the rebuild kits... but it does. I have never seen a rebuild kit on a factory control arm that could withstand a race environment. That's exactly why I buy new factory 968 control arms every 3 years.... no matter the condition.

TonyG
Old 05-08-2012, 04:05 AM
  #25  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Ah ok, well maybe mine just went because it was due to go, and the others were just because they were rebuilds...

I was thinking the geometry of the joint from going from 16-18" and lowered might have been the cause...



Quick Reply: Who's had experience with Fibreglass panels?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:30 PM.