Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Does low vacuum induce rich condition? AFPR Questions too!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2012, 08:41 PM
  #1  
Ben951S
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Ben951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Chester, PA / Morristown, NJ
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Question Does low vacuum induce rich condition? AFPR Questions too!

Hi All,

I am still having my 'running rich all the time'.

No vacuum leaks (smoke tested), AFM replaced with known good, vacuum lines routed correctly, and has street cam.

Bottom line, my vacuum at cold idle is 7-9psi, warm vacuum is 12-14psi.

In gear while coasting at speed, I can pull 22psi vacuum.

None-the-less, I am still running rich. I still get down to less than 11 on WOT, and idle at 14.7.

I am running a 2.5bar instead of a 3.0bar FPR (3.0 is required by A-Tune).

I am thinking of getting an adjustable leaning out even more.

I get 20.5mpg no matter how I drive. I don't want to try and get 25+mpg only to lean out and blow up my motor. Temps are great, tempted to just leave it as is.

If I am running too lean, would be able to see on the WBO2, but would I still idle at 14.7? I know I am not lean now, just asking.

So, in short...

Does low vacuum mean running lean? With a cam, is there anyway to get the vacuum back up? Is this even related?

Thank you!

Old 04-02-2012, 02:04 AM
  #2  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

With a more agressive cam, your vacuum numbers are normal; lower vacuum at idle, and that's just the way it is.
Generally, a cam (and differences in vacuum) will not affect the air/fuel ratios.
Running lean will not cause low vacuum, unless at idle it's running so lean that your idle RPM is significantly lower.
Old 04-02-2012, 02:09 AM
  #3  
Ben951S
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Ben951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Chester, PA / Morristown, NJ
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I thought the FPR would be affected by the overall vacuum of the system.

If my vacuum numbers are not affecting how rich I run, then I still have my darn 'Running Rich' problem! Argh!

Known good AFM
DME Temp Switch replaced
A-Tune
No Vacuum leaks, resealed throttle body, good Wideband#s (rich at WOT, idle at 14.7). Argh!
Old 04-02-2012, 02:13 AM
  #4  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,435
Received 87 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

who told you 11 a/f ratio is too rich?
Old 04-02-2012, 02:15 AM
  #5  
Ben951S
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Ben951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Chester, PA / Morristown, NJ
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I dip below 11 at WOT... I got this from searching...

"Idle 14.7 - 14.9
part throttle 13.2-15.1
interstate cruise 14.8-15.3
boost 11.7 - 12.4


Idle - 14.7
Low Load (Highway) - 16.0/17.0
1/4 Throttle - 14.0/15.5
1/2 Throtte - 13.5/14.5
3/4 Throttle - 13.0/13.5
Full Throttle - 12.0/12.8


"

So it seems most say 11.5 or so at WOT. I dip under 11 depending on gear.

Also, my rear bumper (white) turns black (spotted) because of running rich. My poor cat!
Old 04-02-2012, 02:22 AM
  #6  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,435
Received 87 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

I gonna tell you something 10:9 -11:1 at wot isn't that bad, I always have a saying if you see that black smoke coming out of your car, that means is happy. I wouldn't worry about and I don't think cylinder's wall washing would occur at 11 a/f . Anything above 11:7 isn't too safe unless you are running race fuel, I have seen a lot of vendors suggesting 12:1-12:5 , that is BS. I am one of those old school 951 guys who tuned my car at 11:1-11:5 at wot ran 21-23psi daily for 4 years until my car was rear ended and had to parted out, sold my engine to the infamous ST and he made that claimed 602rwhp with my block, by the way my block was scoreless even after 4 years of rich mix and high boost

Originally Posted by Ben951S
I dip below 11 at WOT... I got this from searching...

"Idle 14.7 - 14.9
part throttle 13.2-15.1
interstate cruise 14.8-15.3
boost 11.7 - 12.4


Idle - 14.7
Low Load (Highway) - 16.0/17.0
1/4 Throttle - 14.0/15.5
1/2 Throtte - 13.5/14.5
3/4 Throttle - 13.0/13.5
Full Throttle - 12.0/12.8


"

So it seems most say 11.5 or so at WOT. I dip under 11 depending on gear.

Also, my rear bumper (white) turns black (spotted) because of running rich. My poor cat!
Old 04-02-2012, 02:27 AM
  #7  
Ben951S
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Ben951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Chester, PA / Morristown, NJ
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I am okay with 11.-11.5 for WOT.

But I mean, 20.5mpg, mostly highway... =\ and the rear-bumper coloring/speckling... It just seems a little excessive.

But in the interest of lazy, I'd rather not lean it out and lose the motor either...

Hey Lart, did you see my PM? I want some parts if you have em!
Old 04-02-2012, 02:28 AM
  #8  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE=Ben951S;9411681]I thought the FPR would be affected by the overall vacuum of the system.

QUOTE]

The vacuum/pressure line that's connected to the FPR keeps the pressure differential always the same across the injectors; precisely so that intake manifold pressure or vacuum WILL NOT affect the air/fuel ratios.

An even 11:1 is a little rich, especially if you said you had to down from the prescribed 3.0 bar FPR to a 2.5 bar.

What's your wideband say when at part throttle/lower boost acceleration?
Old 04-02-2012, 02:28 AM
  #9  
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
lart951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: California
Posts: 14,435
Received 87 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ben951S
I am okay with 11.-11.5 for WOT.

But I mean, 20.5mpg, mostly highway... =\ and the rear-bumper coloring/speckling... It just seems a little excessive.

But in the interest of lazy, I'd rather not lean it out and lose the motor either...

Hey Lart, did you see my PM? I want some parts if you have em!
I am going through my pm's now lol
Old 04-02-2012, 02:32 AM
  #10  
Ben951S
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Ben951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Chester, PA / Morristown, NJ
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

[quote=TurboTommy;9411697]
Originally Posted by Ben951S
I thought the FPR would be affected by the overall vacuum of the system.

QUOTE]

The vacuum/pressure line that's connected to the FPR keeps the pressure differential across the injectors always the same; precisely so that intake manifold pressure or vacuum WILL NOT affect the air/fuel ratios.

An even 11:1 is a little rich, especially if you said you had to down from the prescribed 3.0 bar FPR to a 2.5 bar.

What's your wideband say when at part throttle/lower boost acceleration?

Part throttle it only goes down a little bit, I really need to hit 50% throttle to get it down in 13's or lower. It seems to need WOT to dive into 12s or 11s, and needs to be boosting too, if I'm in 4th at 40 and go 'WOT' I don't get a lower AFR until boost spools up, and it seems right.

And yes, it does get under 11 under some conditions.

Oh. It runs at 10 (off the gauge) on start-up. Maybe due to O2 not being warmed up/open loop mode, but I believe even that I was told, is low It takes warming up to get to 14.7

I did use the 'generic' Engine Temp sensor, but it is the compatible part/spec (Walker I think? Doorman?)... That's the only thing I can think of maybe... Injectors do not leak, Fuel pressure gauge seems reasonable. I think I should log fuel pressure with WBO2...
Old 05-01-2017, 05:05 PM
  #11  
SummitP
Instructor
 
SummitP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Meant to post in different thread.....
#struggling with the internet.

Last edited by SummitP; 05-01-2017 at 06:28 PM. Reason: Meant to post in other thread
Old 05-01-2017, 06:22 PM
  #12  
SummitP
Instructor
 
SummitP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

meant to post in other thread. forum challenges for me. Please delete post...
Old 05-01-2017, 09:18 PM
  #13  
Black51
Three Wheelin'
 
Black51's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Just FYI, vacuum is not measured in psi. It's measured in in/hg, or "inches of mercury".

Have you checked the FQS setting on the DME?
Old 05-09-2017, 01:01 AM
  #14  
F18Rep
Three Wheelin'
 
F18Rep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: St Louis, Missouri, USA
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Have you checked the FQS setting on the DME?
Yea and I wonder what a restrictive cat (since you mentioned it) does to AF....Bruce



Quick Reply: Does low vacuum induce rich condition? AFPR Questions too!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:52 AM.