DYNO results
03-02-2012, 04:49 PM
#31
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have a 3 bar FPR with #55lb injectors but i was looking at meth kit by snow performance my father (jbrown) has meth on his 930 running 16psi. im looking at the m tune with #83 and see were that bring me. also sending my intercooler out to lindsay racing to make it a little bigger
03-04-2012, 03:24 PM
#32
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A MAF may not give you all the hp gains you want, regardless of your set up, but any reduction in air flow restriction will provide gains. If not hp, you will pick up spool up rpms thus broadening the previous tq curve.
I know just going from my huntley 3" maf to the 90mm Lightning maf there was a major difference.
It boils down to getting as much air in as fast as you can and as much of that air out as fast as you can. So anything that aids in that process is beneficial.
I know just going from my huntley 3" maf to the 90mm Lightning maf there was a major difference.
It boils down to getting as much air in as fast as you can and as much of that air out as fast as you can. So anything that aids in that process is beneficial.
03-06-2012, 01:56 PM
#33
Instructor
Do you think that includes an open wastegate dump? I know it's generally tied in and I ordered a 3" exhuast from lindsey but figured I could weld it myself later and save myself the $100. I can't imagine having an open wastegate dump would make that much difference.
03-06-2012, 03:06 PM
#34
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
if you get the M-Tune or Vitesse (you choice, both good) the difference is day and night. you'll pick up a lot of bottom end/off boost power, and you'll increase your on boost power also.
03-06-2012, 03:26 PM
#35
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
on a dynopack wich is suspose to be 10-12 percent lower then a dyno jet i put down 299.8 wheel hp at 16psi of boost following mods -LR duel port, 55lb injectors, full 3 inch exhuast and 3 inch down pipe, and medium size garret about the size of a k27 not sure the trim size will upload the dyno sheet tonight
Yea I maxed out the turbo for sure. I am shooting for the same range as yourself so I upped to a LR61. I hit 270 with a stock dp and only a 3" cat exhaust. I figured I better order the exhaust if I'm going to the 61. I think I was on a dynojet just from looking at my numbers. I just hit the hp crack pipe and I'm off the deep end.
have you thought about going with a maf, tuning, and running 17psi? I'm not sure but that might put you close to your target.
have you thought about going with a maf, tuning, and running 17psi? I'm not sure but that might put you close to your target.
03-06-2012, 04:01 PM
#36
Rennlist Member
Yeah, was that 270whp at what, 17psi with a Maf and bigger exhaust w k26?? Wow!
03-06-2012, 05:56 PM
#37
Instructor
That was 270whp peaked at 20psi with LR mafterburner, cat back only exhaust, 26/6. It peaked at 20 even though i was running right around 18-19. I can post the dyno this weekend.
03-06-2012, 06:07 PM
#38
Going with the pack
is quite monotonous.
Rennlist Member
is quite monotonous.
Rennlist Member
270 with a Stock K26 ..? Well i guess you just proved JBrown correct ..
And yes I let off really early due to issues with the CV (immediate loss of boost).
Edited for a full previous run:
03-06-2012, 10:03 PM
#41
Instructor
Yea prob. I'd like to run about 16psi so I ordered up LR 61. I'm not looking to hijack this thread anymore than I have. Sorry about that.
I'm not sure if their is much more you could do without maf or cams.
I'm not sure if their is much more you could do without maf or cams.
03-06-2012, 10:53 PM
#42
Rennlist Member
03-07-2012, 09:52 PM
#43
Going with the pack
is quite monotonous.
Rennlist Member
is quite monotonous.
Rennlist Member
Supposedly 15 psi... That would be with the banjo bolt marked accordingly. However there was no boost gauge in the car at the time.
03-07-2012, 10:25 PM
#44
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah the dynojet reads about 10-12% higher then a mustang or dynopack.. @seattle944 i have lindsays 3inch with an open dump and its LOUD. i love it tho here is a video of my car in a tunnel with open dump not rele ripping but i hit it a little bit