Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

86 250hp 951?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2003, 10:25 AM
  #1  
facboy
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
facboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London
Posts: 863
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post 86 250hp 951?

hi all,

i recently came across a car for sale advertised as a 250hp 951. the price seemed pretty good, so i phoned the guy up, but he tells me that the car is an '86, completely stock. according to him, the 250hp cars were the earlier ones, and that later cars got nerfed down to 220 when they put all the emissions stuff in etc.

my understanding was always that only the '88 turbo S and later cars were 250hp, but this is not the first time that somebody has told me that the '86 cars were more powerful. i'd always dismissed it as the ravings of some looney , but now i'm starting to wonder.

any thoughts? was this a peculiarity of the australian market?
Old 04-11-2003, 11:25 AM
  #2  
User 41221
Banned
 
User 41221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,017
Received 173 Likes on 108 Posts
Post

I can't speak directly of the Austrailian market, but that sure sounds backwards to me... The factory never made any claims of having a 250hp ROW 951 in '86, so I am pretty sure that guy is wrong.

Regards,
Old 04-11-2003, 12:20 PM
  #3  
slevy951
Former Sponsor
 
slevy951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

I'm going to agree with sh944. HP goes up, not down.
Old 04-11-2003, 12:59 PM
  #4  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

I remember hearing the 944 Turbo was one of the first "world" cars here all the cars in all markets got the same emission equipment and where rated at the same hp. 217 SAE and 220 DIN spec.

This is contrasted with the 944 NA that was 163 DIN RoW and 143 SAE in the US. Here the emissions stuff and lower C/R dropped HP. In 1988 the came with all cars with a 160 DIN and 158 SAE spec.
Old 04-11-2003, 04:22 PM
  #5  
pikey7
Drifting
 
pikey7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The old country
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

According to PET, the MY87 car was the first with 184kW (250Hp), all before that were lower Hp. There is no destinction between any markets listed. The MY 87 cars were also designated turbo-s where the earlier and later were just turbo.

There is a M479 code for 'version for Australia', but I can't find anything more in detail as to what that was.
Old 04-11-2003, 07:31 PM
  #6  
sybelix
Burning Brakes
 
sybelix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by pikey7:
<strong>According to PET, the MY87 car was the first with 184kW (250Hp), all before that were lower Hp. There is no destinction between any markets listed. The MY 87 cars were also designated turbo-s where the earlier and later were just turbo.

</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I'll have to definatelly disagree with your statement;
Turbo S model was made MY 88.5 to somewhat '89 !
NOT '87 , in any market !
All turbo S and post models were delivered with
larger turbocharger ( 26/8, instead the pre S 26/6 )and 184 kw / 250 hp, and lots of other
improvements..

So either you have a '88 S-model manual or there is some mistakes in your sources..

Anyway, MY '87 was not 250 hp, at least not stock ! <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
Old 04-11-2003, 07:50 PM
  #7  
Matt Sheppard
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Matt Sheppard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kalifornyuh
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

could easily be 250HP at the crank for an '86, but not with the stock software.
Old 04-11-2003, 07:54 PM
  #8  
Waterguy
Three Wheelin'
 
Waterguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

Originally posted by Mike:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica"> There is a M479 code for 'version for Australia', but I can't find anything more in detail as to what that was. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">The 1987 and 1988 models of the 944S were detuned for Australia (182 hp versus 188 hp ROW) so that they could run on regular unleaded. Perhaps premium unleaded was unavailable there at the time, so the 951 also had to be detuned to run on regular.

Or maybe M479 is "optional Didgeridoo." <img border="0" alt="[ouch]" title="" src="graemlins/c.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[cherrsagai]" title="" src="graemlins/drink.gif" />
Old 04-11-2003, 09:53 PM
  #9  
facboy
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
facboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London
Posts: 863
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

actually, u might have something there Don. i have seen a few 944s (and other cars too, come to think of it) with some artistic interpretation of the didgeridoo attached. it sits under the car and has a few post-modern curves and variances in diameter along its length. and they're made out of metal instead of the traditional wood. i thought all cars had them, but now you're telling me that they are peculiar to australia?!?

on a more serious note, definitely food for thought. maybe i will ring the guy up and ask him to tell me the VIN.

there might be something in what pikey says btw. i have seen a chart in my local dealer which shows all porsche models from i forget when up until the 993 turbo, and it definitely lists the Turbo S as being 1987.
Old 04-11-2003, 11:06 PM
  #10  
Randy_J
Three Wheelin'
 
Randy_J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

<img border="0" alt="[oops]" title="" src="graemlins/oops.gif" />
From Peter Morgan's Book "Original PORSCHE 924/944/968" page 87 Data Section:

MY Model/Mkt # Built Max BHP Max TQ (Nm)
1985 944T/RoW 178 220@5800 330@3500
1986 RoW/US/Can 10,937 220@5800 330@3500
1987 RoW/US/Can 5,073 220@5800 330@3500

1988 944T 2,433* 220@5800 330@3500

1988 944 TurboS 1,635* 250@6000 350@4000
1989 944 Turbo 2,718 250@6000 350@4000
1990 944 Turbo 1,233 250@6000 350@4000
1991 944 Turbo 1,038 250@6000 350@4000

*1988 MY there were 2 versions - the regular Turbo (2433 worldwide) and the 1635 with the "S" package (250@6000 350@4000) - this is always confusing for buyers of 1988 Turbo - whether it is an "S" or regular turbo. Perhaps this is where all the confusion comes from. Sorry, but THERE DEFINITELY IS NO Factory TURBO"S" in 1987 MY! And checking VIN is no good either because Porsche did not separate the "S" from regular turbo VIN #'s. What you can do is check the tail or owners manual decal and look for option code # 758 Special model 944 Turbo 1988
that designates the "S" option
Just do a GOOGLE search for Porsche 944 TurboS and you'll find lots of sites with good info.

There are a few telltale signs for a 1988 TurboS that you can spot - big front brakes (12" with bigger calipers from a 928S4), rolled front and back fender lips, wider "machine finished" forged rims, M030 Koni adjustable suspension pcs.

The HP and TQ are all at the crank; a stock 1986 951 has 220@5800 BHP & 330@3500 TQ

<img border="0" alt="[typing]" title="" src="graemlins/yltype.gif" />
Old 04-11-2003, 11:32 PM
  #11  
951carter
Racer
 
951carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: richmond
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

There are ALOT of errors in Peter Morgan's book, I would advise taking all of the info within with a grain of salt.

350 ft/lbs of torque in a stocker would be great!

The actual #'s are;

K26/6= 217hp 243tq

K26/8= 247hp 243tq
Old 04-12-2003, 01:20 AM
  #12  
GOBOGIE
Budding Photographer
Rennlist Member
 
GOBOGIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: A Quiet Little Lake In The Middle of Nowhere
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Carter beat me to it. 247hp/243tq
Old 04-12-2003, 02:16 AM
  #13  
Randy_J
Three Wheelin'
 
Randy_J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by 951carter:
<strong>There are ALOT of errors in Peter Morgan's book, I would advise taking all of the info within with a grain of salt.

350 ft/lbs of torque in a stocker would be great!

The actual #'s are;

K26/6= 217hp 243tq

K26/8= 247hp 243tq</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Peter Morgan reference for TQ is in Newton Meters not lbs/ft.

I've seen the 1988 TurboS listed as 250Hp and then 1989- at 247 before somewhere. But in any event, no 1985/86/87 OEM 944 Turbos with anything &gt;220 HP.
Old 04-12-2003, 03:08 AM
  #14  
951carter
Racer
 
951carter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: richmond
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

AH.....you got on that one! I have noticed alot of other errors in his book though. It is not a bad read though.
Old 04-12-2003, 03:25 AM
  #15  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Post

Interestingly, though all 944's came out of the "same" factory, mine was NZ new and did not come with emmission control stuff, ie no cat, no relay for the cat accordingly to prove it was never there! I imagine I must have sneaked in one or two extra HP there! Whooo free HP for me!

Andrew


Quick Reply: 86 250hp 951?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:16 PM.