Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Had a C32 AMG give me a decent run?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2011 | 03:03 PM
  #16  
elargentino's Avatar
elargentino
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: comeback trail
Default

Originally Posted by lart951
Yeah, easily in the twistiest and top end speed. The 928 gts can't hold a candle to my chevy
I agree, yes.
Well remember, you ARE 1,900 pounds lighter in the Nova
Old 05-29-2011 | 03:07 PM
  #17  
lart951's Avatar
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,451
Likes: 95
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by elargentino
I agree, yes.
Well remember, you ARE 1,900 pounds lighter in the Nova
At least, the gross weight of the gts is around 4800lbs
Old 05-29-2011 | 03:10 PM
  #18  
elargentino's Avatar
elargentino
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: comeback trail
Default

Originally Posted by lart951
At least, the gross weight of the gts is around 4800lbs

Here are the official specs, as published:

1991 Porsche 928 GTS dimensions & weight
Wheelbase 2500 mm 98.4 in
Track front 1552 mm 61.1 in
rear 1545 mm 60.8 in
Length 4447 mm 175.1 in
Width 1850 mm 72.8 in
Height 1282 mm 50.5 in
Length:wheelbase ratio 1.78
Ground clearance
Kerb weight 2327 kg 5120 lb
Weight distribution
(Front) 52.00 %
Fuel capacity
Old 05-29-2011 | 03:18 PM
  #19  
lart951's Avatar
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,451
Likes: 95
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by elargentino
Here are the official specs, as published:

1991 Porsche 928 GTS dimensions & weight
Wheelbase 2500 mm 98.4 in
Track front 1552 mm 61.1 in
rear 1545 mm 60.8 in
Length 4447 mm 175.1 in
Width 1850 mm 72.8 in
Height 1282 mm 50.5 in
Length:wheelbase ratio 1.78
Ground clearance
Kerb weight 2327 kg 5120 lb
Weight distribution
(Front) 52.00 %
Fuel capacity
5120lbs no wonder they call the Fatyenne the new 928
Old 05-29-2011 | 04:11 PM
  #20  
Jeremy Himsel's Avatar
Jeremy Himsel
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,649
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ - NJ Runaway
Default

Originally Posted by lart951
Well, I found me a v8 chevy, now I know what you guys who own v8 mean by torque and power, I bet my v8 is way faster than a 928 not only in a straight line but in the twistiest, I am sure it will smoke the hell out a gts. I have it for sale on ebay
Funny stuff.... That's a nova alright. Need a mullet wig and a bare foot gas pedal as a throw in.
Old 05-29-2011 | 08:27 PM
  #21  
Paulyy's Avatar
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 4
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

just did a quick search and found out that the stock intercoolers on the amg C32s are water to air coolers.
unless he changed it, i doubt he'd know what was under the hood.
Old 05-29-2011 | 08:40 PM
  #22  
alxdgr8's Avatar
alxdgr8
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 57
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
just did a quick search and found out that the stock intercoolers on the amg C32s are water to air coolers.
unless he changed it, i doubt he'd know what was under the hood.
Air still travels through it, so it could still leak.
Old 05-29-2011 | 09:27 PM
  #23  
Tim-C.'s Avatar
Tim-C.
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
Default

Originally Posted by elargentino
Here are the official specs, as published:

1991 Porsche 928 GTS dimensions & weight
Kerb weight 2327 kg 5120 lb
Weight distribution
(Front) 52.00 %
That is really surprising. I'd be curious to see the data source.

Unless those cars were made of lead, I cannot see how a 928 GTS would outweigh a current V8 Cayenne, given the latter's AWD, size, luxury/safety items, etc. Or looked at another way, this is 700lbs more than a Panamera Turbo.

Sure no-one's mixing up GVWR and curb weight?

FWIW, Wikipedia puts the car at between 3200 and 3600 lbs.

Tim
Old 05-29-2011 | 09:43 PM
  #24  
95ONE's Avatar
95ONE
Race Car
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Default

raced a few of those. One that always showed up on Saturday nights back in the day, the Kids dad bought it for him. Amazing..and he ended up flipping it end over end before the end of a year. It was as fast as my NSX. 13.4 sec @ 104mph (without nitrous) (13.2 was my fastest on a cool night) So yeah, they're pretty quick as is.. no mods. Oh yeah, the quarter mile time or the NSX was stock.. 1991.. Me driving though with Nitto Street/drag radials. It's all in the start and zero care for your transmission. I know car and driver says 13.9-14.1. Don't care and neither did my time slips.
Old 05-30-2011 | 03:26 PM
  #25  
Ifly951's Avatar
Ifly951
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 182
Likes: 1
Default

I have a friend with a really nice C32, and yes they are pretty strong even stock. His is the supercharged V6, it's a nice setup.

The early AMG's were a V6 setup. The later C32 AMG's are a NA V8. So if this guy had V8 badging on his car then he was full of ish. The V8's are not supercharged, if they were they would be 505 stock hp monster's and would be much more popular. Instead both the V6 and V8 versions are around 340 to 360 hp.

So I don't see where he is going to have an intercooler leak on a NA V8? He might of slapped the Kompresser badge on the car to be cool. Nice kill anyway you slice it, and let's me know where I need to be before playing with my friend. He want's me bad, but not after I get done with my Rogue M-tune and 18 lbs of boost
Old 05-30-2011 | 04:45 PM
  #26  
pole position's Avatar
pole position
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 1
From: Official Jack off extinguisher
Default

Originally Posted by Ifly951
I have a friend with a really nice C32, and yes they are pretty strong even stock. His is the supercharged V6, it's a nice setup.

The early AMG's were a V6 setup. The later C32 AMG's are a NA V8. So if this guy had V8 badging on his car then he was full of ish. The V8's are not supercharged, if they were they would be 505 stock hp monster's and would be much more popular. Instead both the V6 and V8 versions are around 340 to 360 hp.

So I don't see where he is going to have an intercooler leak on a NA V8? He might of slapped the Kompresser badge on the car to be cool. Nice kill anyway you slice it, and let's me know where I need to be before playing with my friend. He want's me bad, but not after I get done with my Rogue M-tune and 18 lbs of boost
You are misinformed

C36....inline six NA
C32....supercharged v6
C43....NA V8
C63....NA V8 6.3 l

With the exception of the C63 which does with a software update/exhaust elevens/ 120 mph they are relative slow due to weight to power ratio.
Old 05-30-2011 | 07:25 PM
  #27  
piperporsche180944's Avatar
piperporsche180944
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Lart, what does that thing run in the 1/4?
Old 05-30-2011 | 07:27 PM
  #28  
piperporsche180944's Avatar
piperporsche180944
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by racerxrick
I think it's just a supercharged V6 though I thought I saw a V8 symbol? Left work yesterday heading home with the A/C on. Taking a left onto a lonely road and this Mercedes jumps all over my *** end through the turn. I remained calm and went around the one car in the way. After clearing the same car he jumps on it and pulls up on me at speed. I nailed it (3rd) gear and pulled him nicely though really only a couple cars. Hell he hung tight!

Next right onto another wide road and he whips up on me again. This time it's a 2nd gear roll PLUS my A/C was off and I dialed in another pound of boost on the MBC Not very close this time so he lets off pretty quick to save face.

He pulls up at the next light and that's when I see all the AMG badging and a killer set of wheels. He rolled down his window (more than most of them do) and seemed confused and shocked. "uh...that things quick?" he exclaims as if asking a question. BTW, I'm guessing he was NOT stock as again the car hung pretty tight on the third gear roll.

Now is when it got funny...he then stated "well I have a leak in my intercooler" and then hangs a right. LOL. Come on buddy...take the loss like a man.
Where is your dash mount camera???? You are killing me with the videos... Or rather... Lack of...
Old 05-31-2011 | 12:04 AM
  #29  
Ifly951's Avatar
Ifly951
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 182
Likes: 1
Default

Not to be rude, but it's hard to be misinformed when I see my friends C32 every week, and I have worked on it with him several times. I did not mention the previous C series because they are older, and I know about the C43 being the V8 I just did not put C43 in the post. This was because the OP figured it was the V6 version, but had the V8 badge on it. Which could be misleading by the owner of the car he ran with.

I have also test drove a couple of the AMG cars myself as I am tempted to buy an E55 AMG within this year. I am debating upon one of those or the Cadillac V series. I recently drove the new 2 door CTS V and was overall impressed with the whole car.

Regardless, the AMG line is a solid performance series from MB.
Old 05-31-2011 | 03:50 AM
  #30  
alxdgr8's Avatar
alxdgr8
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,819
Likes: 57
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Ifly951
Regardless, the AMG line is a solid performance series from MB.
When they work....


Quick Reply: Had a C32 AMG give me a decent run?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:07 AM.