Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

June Motor Trend - New Competition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2003, 08:51 PM
  #1  
TurboTime
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
TurboTime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rosamond, CA -Willow Springs RCWY
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool June Motor Trend - New Competition

Uh-oh...
New June Motor Trend has the $30K 2003 Mitsu Lancer Evolution with 271 Hp and 273 Tq, 0-60 @ 4.59 receiving rave reviews, like "For $30,000, you can't go wrong. I'm blown away."

Know your enemy - Sun Tsu

<img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
Old 05-02-2003, 02:07 AM
  #2  
BoostGuy951
Three Wheelin'
 
BoostGuy951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gulf Shores, Alabama
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

All Wheel Drive Cheaters <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
Old 05-02-2003, 02:13 AM
  #3  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Post

lets invest that much into our cars and lets see whose better,hehe.

that and the new 2004 subaru wrx sti (300hp)
Old 05-02-2003, 04:44 AM
  #4  
sybelix
Burning Brakes
 
sybelix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by shortyboy:
<strong>lets invest that much into our cars and lets see whose better,hehe.

that and the new 2004 subaru wrx sti (300hp)</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">hehe.. <img border="0" alt="[thumbsup]" title="" src="graemlins/bigok.gif" /> I'm in.

And to think of it, what would 12 - 16 year old subaru / Mitsu look like..and feel like..
oh well, no need to ask..
Old 05-02-2003, 09:08 AM
  #5  
streckfu's
Rennlist Member
 
streckfu's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 77,321
Received 668 Likes on 448 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by shortyboy:
<strong>lets invest that much into our cars and lets see whose better,hehe.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">The only problem with that is our cars (951s) were $30-40k cars back in the 80s. So to be fair, put $30k of mods into both and see what happens.

Now wait to see how well the Lacer and STi hold up for 16 years. The Porsche wins the endurance test hands down.
Old 05-02-2003, 09:46 AM
  #6  
Dave E
Pro
 
Dave E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

30-40 k cars?!? mine had a sticker of 46,393!!
Old 05-02-2003, 10:47 AM
  #7  
Russ Murphy
Drifting
 
Russ Murphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">The only problem with that is our cars (951s) were $30-40k cars back in the 80s. So to be fair, put $30k of mods into both and see what happens. </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">As Dave said, more like $40-50k, not to mention what the $ equivalency is for '88 to '03. Our cars are more like a current $66k car. There's no getting around the fact that cars keep getting better (both performance-wise and value-wise).
Old 05-02-2003, 11:44 AM
  #8  
EZRider
Three Wheelin'
 
EZRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Impressive performance, hopefully this will force other manufacturers of poser-pseudo sports cars to "get real". On the other hand it's ugly with very cheap appearance <img border="0" alt="[oops]" title="" src="graemlins/oops.gif" /> . For the money my choice would be WRX STi <img border="0" alt="[thumbsup]" title="" src="graemlins/bigok.gif" />

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by TurboTime:
<strong>Uh-oh...
New June Motor Trend has the $30K 2003 Mitsu Lancer Evolution with 271 Hp and 273 Tq, 0-60 @ 4.59 receiving rave reviews, like "For $30,000, </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">
Old 05-02-2003, 11:55 AM
  #9  
RPG951S
Racer
 
RPG951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I just hope it's 'on-track' performance is better than the 2002 WRX, which was, to be polite; lame-o. Wayyy to heavy, and softly sprung. AWD doesn't do diddly-poop on a dry track, except suck-up power in the drivetrain
Old 05-02-2003, 11:59 AM
  #10  
clubracer6
Rennlist Member
 
clubracer6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dundee, IL (Chicago)
Posts: 879
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Post

It's just a shame this rockets are AWD. There really is nothing like our cars being built today.
Old 05-02-2003, 08:18 PM
  #11  
streckfu's
Rennlist Member
 
streckfu's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 77,321
Received 668 Likes on 448 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Dave E:
<strong>30-40 k cars?!? mine had a sticker of 46,393!!</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">In 86, I think, they were high 30s and by 89 were high 40s. If that means wouls cost $60k today, that would slide the bang for the buck closer to the STi and Lancer Evo. They would be the better performing cars off the showroom floor but I maintain that the Porsche have staying power. They would last 16-20 years and be worth more at the end of that timeframe.

Just my .02
Old 05-02-2003, 10:05 PM
  #12  
Jake951
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jake951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,930
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Russ Murphy:
<strong> There's no getting around the fact that cars keep getting better (both performance-wise and value-wise).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Very true. We do have to remember that back in the late 80's, the world of performance cars was very different than today. The 951 was one of the highest performing cars of its time and it had no Japanese competition to speak of.

To recall what it was like in the '80's, here's a direct quote from the June '88 issue of Automobile magazine on its review of the Turbo S:

"...on 90 percent of this country's twisty roads--and for 99 percent of its drivers--this is the fastest car from point A to point B on the market today."

I also have a very interesting article from an '88 issue of the British 'Performance Car' magazine comparing the Turbo S to the Ferrari 328. Here's a quote:

"It [the Turbo S] represents the crushing victory of technology over engineering convention and customer prejudice: demolishing almost all opposition within the vast sweep of its performance, it proves that four cylinders can do everything that five, six, eight--even 12--can achieve."

If I get around to it, I'll scan the full article and post it.
Old 05-02-2003, 11:03 PM
  #13  
streckfu's
Rennlist Member
 
streckfu's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 77,321
Received 668 Likes on 448 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Jake951:
<strong>[QUOTE]
If I get around to it, I'll scan the full article and post it.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Please do!!!
Old 05-03-2003, 07:28 PM
  #14  
blu951
Instructor
 
blu951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Honolulu, HI.
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Both the Mitsu and the Scubie are wonderful cars but they lack "Substance" and every P-car has that built in.
Old 05-03-2003, 09:35 PM
  #15  
LP
Advanced
 
LP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: nonesuch
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thats pretty damn quick but IMHO they are just plain fugley no soul <img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="eek.gif" /> . Plus you are still driving a Mitsu <img border="0" alt="[nono]" title="" src="graemlins/nono.gif" /> . BTW I sold Mitsu's for a while a few years ago. They were cheaply made.
I'll stick with my 951 LP <img border="0" alt="[bigbye]" title="" src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" />


Quick Reply: June Motor Trend - New Competition



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:04 AM.