Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Use of Larger Radiator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2010, 05:25 PM
  #1  
Nader Fotouhi
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nader Fotouhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Garden State
Posts: 1,017
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default Use of Larger Radiator

Is anyone using an oversize (comapred to stock) Griffin radiator in a 951? I would like to try a higher water cooling capacity to keep fluid temperatures down instead of a second oil coolerin my 944S2 race car.
Old 10-21-2010, 05:59 PM
  #2  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,570
Received 654 Likes on 508 Posts
Default

rather than do that, why not fit a lower-temp fan switch and thermostat...much cheaper...


and rather than a second oil cooler, why not do a larger single oil cooler?
Old 10-22-2010, 08:29 AM
  #3  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nader Fotouhi
Is anyone using an oversize (comapred to stock) Griffin radiator in a 951? I would like to try a higher water cooling capacity to keep fluid temperatures down instead of a second oil coolerin my 944S2 race car.
You could take a look at this solution…(I may just be slightly biased towards it!)

https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...rid=1956<br />
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...eferrerid=1956
Old 10-22-2010, 09:09 AM
  #4  
JohnKoaWood
Nordschleife Master
 
JohnKoaWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fly Away
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Having seen Chris's radiators first hand, they are SWEET! Definitely the one to use if you are looking at going after increased cooling capacity!
Old 10-22-2010, 09:54 AM
  #5  
Darwantae951

 
Darwantae951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,034
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

The radiator mentioned by Chris is a very nice unit.
Old 10-22-2010, 10:39 AM
  #6  
Nader Fotouhi
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nader Fotouhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Garden State
Posts: 1,017
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
rather than do that, why not fit a lower-temp fan switch and thermostat...much cheaper...


and rather than a second oil cooler, why not do a larger single oil cooler?

I am not sure I understand how lower fan switch and thermostat would be useful on the track. A larger oil cooler is an option, but I think a larger radiator has more benefit for both water and oil.

Originally Posted by Chris White
You could take a look at this solution…(I may just be slightly biased towards it!)

https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...rid=1956<br />
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...eferrerid=1956
Chris,

I have looked at and considered yours as an option and would have gotten around to talking to you about it before next spring (plan a solution over the winter). Two questions and please understand that these are not meant as disparaging your design. Do I actually have higher water cooling capacity over stock radiator given that an oil cooler is fitted in the same total surface area as stock unit which I interpret as less room for water. Is the oil cooler more Vulnerable to damage in that spot due to front impact?

Thanks
Old 10-23-2010, 09:32 AM
  #7  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Chris,

I have looked at and considered yours as an option and would have gotten around to talking to you about it before next spring (plan a solution over the winter). Two questions and please understand that these are not meant as disparaging your design. Do I actually have higher water cooling capacity over stock radiator given that an oil cooler is fitted in the same total surface area as stock unit which I interpret as less room for water. Is the oil cooler more Vulnerable to damage in that spot due to front impact?

Thanks[/QUOTE]

I never consider questions (at least honest ones!) as disparaging remarks – its much better to have an educated customer than one that just responds to hype!

The radiator is much thicker than stock – in fact it is as think as possible for the space so the total fluid capacity is the same as stock or possible a little more. The cooling capacity exceeds a new stock radiator and greatly exceeds a 20 year old stock radiator.

To damage the oil cooler you would have to get to the point of bending the radiator support frame – if you do that you will have totaled your car! The stock oil cooler would be damaged as easily as this one. If you are worried about damage from a foreign object remember that the A/C condenser is in front – in addition if the worst happens aluminum coolers can be patched easily by a decent welder.

Here is a pic showing the difference in thickness
Attached Images   
Old 10-23-2010, 10:49 AM
  #8  
Nader Fotouhi
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nader Fotouhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Garden State
Posts: 1,017
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Thanks Chris. This certainly makes sense. I can also leave the stock unit where it is and plug it in case i have to run two oil coolers if needed.



Quick Reply: Use of Larger Radiator



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:21 AM.