Why a MAF....
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
One of my old projects used Accel DFI with a 2 bar Map sensor. I did my own tunning and had a car which ran great at only 8-10lbs of boost. No sensor in the intake path to restrict air flow, just a nice map sensor close to the intake manifold.
Why not use a AFC Neo with a map sensor on a 944 turbo? This would make for a much cleaner setup. For a car with minimal mods running the stock turbo I think this setup could make good power. How come we havn't seen more of this? Who is going to try it first.....
Why not use a AFC Neo with a map sensor on a 944 turbo? This would make for a much cleaner setup. For a car with minimal mods running the stock turbo I think this setup could make good power. How come we havn't seen more of this? Who is going to try it first.....
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#2
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
because lindsey and Vintesse dont sell a kit... Thats why you dont see it as often. Tuning requires you actually know what your doing so its a little more complicated then plug and play.
#6
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Vitesse with vflex software uses a MAP as well a boost solenoid and other goodies so the stock DME can adjust for knock and act like an electronic boost controller. Pretty impressive...
Trending Topics
#8
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Now I've finally re-written the stock code to truly understand a MAF sensor... No piggy-back, just straight MAF wired to the DME with my code changes.
I also use a 3bar MAP sensor for ignition timing, so my timing changes according to how much boost I'm running. We have Sid's car set up this way as well (MAP sensor).
For the OP. I've used one of the best piggyback solutions for converting from AFM to MAP. I'm personal friends with the inventor, and had custom PB software to try to correct some of the issues with running a PB MAP conversion. I was never 100% satisfied with the conversion, there are just too many issues with the stock DME software that cannot be overcome using any PB.
As a result, I started looking at the stock DME software, and after a lot of work dis-assembling it I've decided that the only way to do a proper MAF or MAP conversion is through changing the DME code. Both MAF and MAP are possible, true MAP conversion (without a piggyback) is on my list to do.
Finally, an AFC Neo does not have the necessary capability to do VE - which is what is needed if you want to do a piggyback MAP conversion.
-Rogue
#9
Racer
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
From the horses mouth... Thanks Rogue! I think you should come out with your own MAF/ MAP solution that is more economical then what is out there. It would be nice to control timing based on MAP.
#10
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The PB can be configured to control boost with the provided solenoid.
#11
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Small Business Partner