Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

turbo gurus; need education on turbine back pressure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2010, 06:37 PM
  #16  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for all your responses, guys.
Yes, the ratios that are being mentioned here are full boost readings (whatever that amount is, with the wastegate open), and that's normally how the back pressure vs boost pressure is tested.
I just happen to be the dufos that decided to test at moderate acceleration levels to see what's happening, especially because I have a little more overlap in the cam.
I have the LR 3" downpipe flowing into a 4" exhaust, so post turbo should be taken care of.
Old 03-24-2010, 07:05 PM
  #17  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I have measured it and have seen 2:1 even it higher boost with smaller hotsides.

It seems to me that if you want under a 1.5:1 at high boost you have to have a housing that will spool the turbo above 4k rpm. The only hotside I used that was under 40psi at 25 psi MAP was a T4 .69 a/r.

Right now I have a T4 .48 twin entry that has a little trickery done to it to spool fast and I see well over 2:1 on spoolup. Then when it opens to full it is ~ 40Psi in the crossover.

Highest I have ever registered was ~60psi. Too much of course.

I would love to see others measurements to see what elevation and camshafts effects can be.
Old 03-24-2010, 07:14 PM
  #18  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,919
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

So in essence for 99.9% of our applications we are going to have to have not the ideal amount of backpressure?
Old 03-24-2010, 07:16 PM
  #19  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ignition timing and fueling will have an effect as well .. as it creates the after burn hey ?
Old 03-24-2010, 08:08 PM
  #20  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Thomas if you can measure the exhaust back pressure (after the turbo) it will give you an idea if gains are possible.I have seen (on other cars) less than 1:1 and no exhaust back pressure after the turbo(with a 3" exhaust!), and it was no drag car either.

Last edited by thingo; 03-25-2010 at 12:01 AM.
Old 03-24-2010, 08:39 PM
  #21  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Thomas, Unless there is some pressure in the exhaust, the turbine will not spin. Once the turbine starts spinning things get different.
As I recall you run high boost with the aid of water Methanol, and your engine is fairly strong. You have been running this setup since 2006, don't you think if there was a back-pressure problem, you would have had engine problems by now. Based on the insane top speed you ran, it sounds that you don't baby the car, and it likes it.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 03-24-2010, 09:15 PM
  #22  
Oddjob
Rennlist Member
 
Oddjob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Midwest - US
Posts: 4,656
Received 70 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

For reference, I have measured around 1.6-1.7 backpressure ratio on two different K26/8 cars with 2.5" open exhaust, stock manifolds, crossover, & downpipe, running 14-15 psi boost.
Old 03-24-2010, 09:44 PM
  #23  
ehall
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ehall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: long gone.....
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Oddjob
For reference, I have measured around 1.6-1.7 backpressure ratio on two different K26/8 cars with 2.5" open exhaust, stock manifolds, crossover, & downpipe, running 14-15 psi boost.
OT

Oddjob were you the one that created the 968 mirror install write-up?
Old 03-24-2010, 10:33 PM
  #24  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

First, I want to mention this 2:1 etc.. ratio is called EBR (Exhaust Backpressure Ratio)

Second, I want to mention that having anything with a 1:1 or lower (.5:1) EBR is physically impossible. The reason being is the exhaust pressure between the manifold and turbo is not greater then the intake pressure the turbo will simply fail to spin or will spin in reverse. This is the reason we all run this cool little thing called a Blow off valve.

Third, EBR can change all over the map and to be honest it really doesn't make much of a difference except that it will make it so your overlap with a higher EBR causes more reversion. However, on a turbo car overlap is always left to a minimum to stop reversion in the first place.
Old 03-24-2010, 10:41 PM
  #25  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its rare perhaps imposible to maintain but sure as hell not impossible to achive .
its the pressure differential across the turbine hot side that makes it spin not the pressure differential of the hot + cold side .
Old 03-25-2010, 12:57 AM
  #26  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fast951
Thomas, Unless there is some pressure in the exhaust, the turbine will not spin. Once the turbine starts spinning things get different.
As I recall you run high boost with the aid of water Methanol, and your engine is fairly strong. You have been running this setup since 2006, don't you think if there was a back-pressure problem, you would have had engine problems by now. Based on the insane top speed you ran, it sounds that you don't baby the car, and it likes it.

Yeah, basically what you're saying is right about my car.
However, as you know me by know, I'm **** retentive, and like to have as much information as possible to find out how things work, and then possibly improve on them even more.

So, doing a bit more research it now seems obvious that, of course, you need above atmospheric pressure in the cross-over to spin the turbo, and that will happen even with low intake mani absolute pressures and small throttle openings.
I just didn't think it would be that much.
Old 03-25-2010, 02:20 AM
  #27  
A.Wayne
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
 
A.Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RPM Central
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fishey
First, I want to mention this 2:1 etc.. ratio is called EBR (Exhaust Backpressure Ratio)

Second, I want to mention that having anything with a 1:1 or lower (.5:1) EBR is physically impossible. The reason being is the exhaust pressure between the manifold and turbo is not greater then the intake pressure the turbo will simply fail to spin or will spin in reverse. This is the reason we all run this cool little thing called a Blow off valve.

Third, EBR can change all over the map and to be honest it really doesn't make much of a difference except that it will make it so your overlap with a higher EBR causes more reversion. However, on a turbo car overlap is always left to a minimum to stop reversion in the first place.
Sounds Fishey to me ......
Old 03-25-2010, 10:20 AM
  #28  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
Ok, back to the issue…

I would guess that on initial acceleration (turbine not up to speed, wastegate not open) you should see some higher than normal ratios.
Which is the purpose of VTG turbos correct? A LOT of backpressure initially for super spool up and then rapid reduction in back pressure for the top end.
Old 03-25-2010, 10:51 AM
  #29  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toddk911
Which is the purpose of VTG turbos correct? A LOT of backpressure initially for super spool up and then rapid reduction in back pressure for the top end.
That’s part of it – the VGT set up also ‘aims’ the flow at the outer edges of the exducer to help with initial spool up.
Old 03-25-2010, 10:56 AM
  #30  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

After years of trying I have achieved the perfect 1:1 ratio on my track car set up. After thousands of hours of testing and I can’t count how much money I have found the way to achieve the 1:1 balance….

It simple…I have no pressure on either side…0:0 is 1:1…of course spool up time in literally infinite. Or at least until I get it running again.



Quick Reply: turbo gurus; need education on turbine back pressure



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:19 PM.