Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Why upgrade valve springs?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2010, 11:42 PM
  #1  
HIGHBOOST
Pro
Thread Starter
 
HIGHBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RSVL, CA
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Why upgrade valve springs?!

Alright,

I was reading in a turbo book of mine, and they recomend upgrading your valve springs when planning to run high boost levels on a constant basis.

I understand why to upgrade the springs when increasing the RPM limit/range, but why should they become a weak link with high boost applications?

Thanks for the insight!
Old 01-09-2010, 11:47 PM
  #2  
Silver Rose
Instructor
 
Silver Rose's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Boost is actually pushing down on the top of the valve fighting the spring. The higher the boost the lower you are making your effective valve rate. Increasing the valve spring rate is just counteracting the effectis of the boost pushing down on the valve.

The real debate is at what boost levels do 951's need higher rate springs? My guess is well over 20psi but that is just a guess.
Old 01-10-2010, 04:18 AM
  #3  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so how much pressure do you imagine is on the underside of the valve ??
and why would it not be increased at the same rate ??
its stupid that no one really bother's to calculate the inertial load's of the valve chain witch are a function of valve chain mass cam ramps and rpm .
excessive valve spring rates is giving away free horse power...

can we please see a first hand account of valve bounce please ??? at what spring rate what rpm etc
Old 01-10-2010, 08:18 AM
  #4  
barks944
Advanced
 
barks944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess theres a difference due to volumetric efficiency. So at high RPM where the pressure in the cylinder is less than the manifold the pressure differential might effect the closing of the valve.
Old 01-10-2010, 10:11 AM
  #5  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gt37vgt
can we please see a first hand account of valve bounce please ??? at what spring rate what rpm etc
If you drop a valve from any height over 2' it will bounce....

The only reason to upgrade your valve springs is age or a significant increase in RPM usage.

An intake valve is aprox 2 sq in - so increase of intake manifold pressure of 5psi will add 10 psi of pressure against the valve spring. If the stock ones are in good shape this is OK, if you are adding 10psi of boost (20 psi total) then you might be on the limit.
Old 01-10-2010, 10:35 AM
  #6  
Willard Bridgham 3
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Willard Bridgham 3's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Parral, Chihuahua, Mejico
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Valves and valve train runs in a hot environment. Run hot, cool down........ This is heat cycling and spring materials we use loose their strength with heat cycling.

Increase in pressure with heat cycling means your existing springs (especially if they are original) won't do the job at higher pressures.
Old 01-10-2010, 10:53 AM
  #7  
Silver Rose
Instructor
 
Silver Rose's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

The heat cycling argument is a good one for replacing old valve springs, but does not answer the question as to why have stiffer springs.

The increase in combustion preasure countering the effects of boost on top of the valve is present for about 3/4 of the compreshion strokeand the 3/4 the power stroke. This leaves the the valve possibly opening in other times during the other strokes.

I don't think people would argue that the high boost we use, when applied to the top of the valve would actually open the valve on its own, but more over, it might not allow the valve to close when you want it to. If you do not shut the valve in time you loose some of the effeciancy of the compreshion stroke in the engine and power accordingly.
Old 01-10-2010, 11:15 AM
  #8  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Willard Bridgham 3
Valves and valve train runs in a hot environment. Run hot, cool down........ This is heat cycling and spring materials we use loose their strength with heat cycling.
.

Yes, after skiing in 0 degree weather yesterday I was very fatigued by the heat cycling!
Old 01-10-2010, 11:55 AM
  #9  
Jeremy Himsel
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Jeremy Himsel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ - NJ Runaway
Posts: 3,649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gt37vgt
excessive valve spring rates is giving away free horse power...
I used to believe the same thing until I read a test article done by one of the cam companies a few years ago. What the test showed was while it does take more HP to open a single valve spring, the regenerative characteristic of the valve train cancel out HP losses associated with higher spring rates provided all springs are equal. For every valve spring that is being compressed, another is expanding and returns the energy to the valve train and the engine. Higher rate springs do however expedite the wear process on other valve train components.
Old 01-10-2010, 02:09 PM
  #10  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Silver Rose
I don't think people would argue that the high boost we use, when applied to the top of the valve would actually open the valve on its own, but more over, it might not allow the valve to close when you want it to. If you do not shut the valve in time you loose some of the effeciancy of the compreshion stroke in the engine and power accordingly.

Yes, this is it.
But, unless the valve spring is extremely weak, I think the valve would still eventually close on time at the correct crankshaft angle (in the way of making power). The issue is it will be SLOW to close, not following the cam lobe, hammering down and wiping out your cam and lifters in a very short time.
Old 01-10-2010, 04:13 PM
  #11  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't feel like this is one of those "must do" upgrades. sure, its added sscurity, but if they're in stock tolerance, I see no worries to 18-20psi.

But I'm somewhat cheap, so grain of salt.
Old 01-10-2010, 05:45 PM
  #12  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Check your compression fluids and plugs then wind the boost up ..from many accounts it seems that standard springs are often a bit down on tension so if the head is being done they should be checked .
Old 01-10-2010, 07:37 PM
  #13  
barks944
Advanced
 
barks944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is there a recommended mileage to replace valve spring?
Old 01-10-2010, 07:38 PM
  #14  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

So these uprated Ti springs, retainers are obviously available. At what point do we decide that we need them?
If it's based on boost, what about if we chose to run a big cam but at relatively 'normal' boost levels?
Old 01-10-2010, 07:57 PM
  #15  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll say it again.... if the pressure has not increased on the inside of the valve what was the point of winding the boost up ??
Cam profiles are 1000 more important than boost when selecting valve springs . remember the V is squared and the cam and RPM determines the magnitude of V .

and once more if the pressure doesn't increase inside the valve with boost what did the boost increase possibly achieve ??


Quick Reply: Why upgrade valve springs?!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:33 AM.