Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

951 vs Boxster S vs NSX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2009, 09:21 AM
  #1  
brrgrr
Racer
Thread Starter
 
brrgrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 951 vs Boxster S vs NSX

Looking for feedback - the Boxster S and the NSX are two cars I have considered as replacements for my 951, if I ever get tired of it. ????????

I chose these 2 cars because they are available in the same price range, (25 - 30k) have relatively the same performance, and can be driven daily.

Last edited by brrgrr; 05-28-2009 at 05:09 PM.
Old 05-28-2009, 09:40 AM
  #2  
Lorax
The Impaler
Rennlist Member
 
Lorax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 13,696
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

nsx is an incredibly capable platform. Not quite as easy to make power out of the box. Amazing handling and looks. also much higher price.

boxter s - meh. Not fun to work on, styling is lacking, performance is mediocre.
Old 05-28-2009, 10:08 AM
  #3  
Kool
Part of the IN Crowd
Rennlist Member
 
Kool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Simpsonville, SC
Posts: 4,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would keep the turbo and buy a Boxster for fun. I love the NSX and it is a great car. But in talking with people who have them parts are not cheap. And like any mid engined car they are not easy to work on. I used to have an RSX-S and my mechanic had a NSX he loved the car but never drove it. He said that parts were insane expensive for them and being that they never made that many some things are already hard to find.
Old 05-28-2009, 12:46 PM
  #4  
cas951
Rennlist Member
 
cas951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Santa Clara, Ca
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a Boxster S and a 951. The Boxster S will never replace the 951 in accelaration but it sure is a fun car to drive. I kept both.
Old 05-28-2009, 01:44 PM
  #5  
theedge
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
theedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I would probably go with Boxster S and mod it. The NSX has never really done it for me.
Old 05-28-2009, 03:29 PM
  #6  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,083
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I bet now is a good time to "invest" in an NSX. That car should go up in value over the years if well cared for and mileage is kept reasonably low. Besides that, it is sweet looking. One of the few non-P-cars at the track that gets my undivided attention.
Old 05-28-2009, 03:36 PM
  #7  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't stress enough.. The NSX platform is STILLLLLLLLLLLl lightyears ahead of almost anything. Count on one hand the trillion dollar cars that meet or exceed it's Suspension technology.

Cost.. I've found the parts aren't any more expensive than those for the Porsche. Cheaper in many ways.

Power is difficult to raise. But it is the same as the Boxter.. To put both those cars in the same comparison insults the NSX.

Why do I not have one now? I don't know..... Still thinking.. Oh yeah... millions on the current 951 stop me from going back. I will certainly eventually go back to the NSX in the next couple of years..
Old 05-28-2009, 03:43 PM
  #8  
jasonlp
Three Wheelin'
 
jasonlp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,346
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

New NSX wonder if it will be light years ahead or behind...

http://www.outie.net/forums/viewthread.php?tid=36672

http://jalopnik.com/396334/2010-acur...real-after-all
Old 05-28-2009, 06:04 PM
  #9  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Most of the current NSX community wants to barf at the sight and specs of the now scrapped next gen NSX
Old 05-28-2009, 10:08 PM
  #10  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,546
Received 646 Likes on 500 Posts
Default

NSX is a beauty, certainly a capable car even if a bit underpowered for its potential.

Boxsters are good cars but they are so common it's sickening.

I've seen maybe 3 NSX's this year and I live in SoCal, car capital of USA.
Old 05-28-2009, 10:10 PM
  #11  
gcb951
Burning Brakes
 
gcb951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

NSX. One of the best.
Old 05-28-2009, 10:24 PM
  #12  
ritzblitz
Drifting
 
ritzblitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quakertown, PA
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

NSX hands down. Honda didn't mess around when they designed them.
Old 05-29-2009, 11:08 AM
  #13  
Kit_Chris
Racer
 
Kit_Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A rennlister posted this fascinating opinion/analysis of the NSX by Gordon Murray: http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dggtsppm_6cgtnscht

There is a video somewhere of Japanese car guys running modern day Lambos, Ferraris, BMWs on a race track and their NSX-R was as fast as anything else, and it's a 15+ year old design. Here it is actually: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu7UO...eature=related never mind the annoying commentary, great driving though..

From Wiki: Honda spent a great deal of time and money developing the NS-X. With a robust motorsports apparatus, Honda had significant development resources at its disposal and made extensive use of them. For example, respected Japanese Formula One driver Satoru Nakajima was involved with Honda in the NS-X's early on track development at Suzuka race circuit, where he performed many endurance distance duties related to chassis tuning; but Brazilian Formula One World Champion Ayrton Senna, for whom Honda themselves had powered all three of his world championship winning Formula One race cars before his death in 1994, was considered Honda's main innovator in convincing the company to stiffen the NSX chassis further after testing the car at Honda's Suzuka GP circuit in Japan.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_NSX

I'm venturing on slippery ground but I reckon the NSX should have survived with continued development, the platform is still excellent today, this is a case where the automotive press seriously hurt the image (and sales) of a car by blasting its comparatively low hp and so-called aging design yet failing to recognize the immense capability of the machine. One of the most underrated sports cars of late!

Regards,
Chris

Last edited by Kit_Chris; 05-29-2009 at 12:18 PM.
Old 05-29-2009, 11:22 AM
  #14  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^ +1 on the NSX.
Its a remarkable platform and a real joy to drive hard. The 3.2l engine is better that the earlier 3.0l, but both of them rev to 8000+ and feel like they could go to 10K without a problem.
A classic.



Quick Reply: 951 vs Boxster S vs NSX



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:48 PM.