toddk911

And a lot cheaper if slightly used of course:

http://newhaven.craigslist.org/pts/585615853.html

http://denver.craigslist.org/pts/591445279.html

http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/pts/586545182.html

ShApE

not trying to be rude, but your mods say you have a super 75 and you're only making 317whp? Is that right?

VWaddict

I dunno 'bout numbers, but he passed me one time like I was standing still, and I've got an 89 944TS with chips and some work... I'd say that the car behaves like it's got a little more than 315, but I don't know when it was dyno'ed...

Keith

1fastmr2

also says mustang dyno so add another 15-20 percent onto that.Anyways ebc's are getitng real cheap just search on other turbo forums.i recently sold a hks evc 4 for 175 plus shipping.

toddk911

Correct; at 18psi.

Mustang dyno. Assuming worse case 10% difference for Dynojet = appx 347whp

I hope to get my new MAF and controller installed this week and get an updated dyno.

eniac

Add 10% difference for Dynojet then subtract 30% for the Huntley crap.

With a new good MAF you should see much better numbers.

toddk911

Agree 100%!!

Not only is the Huntley choking out my system, it is actually maxing out. New MAF is calibrated for a LOT more and is far more updated and accurate.

However, the Huntley served its purpose for what I needed at the time.