Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

LINK Standalone.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2008, 02:31 AM
  #46  
eniac
Drifting
 
eniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A.Wayne
Touchey!

One of "these" uses the same injector as you or your internet ignorance calculator attempts to size matey! based on your response , well it must be your milky time , GN!
Do you own a 911 or something?

Again this isn't my calculation, just what was recommended many times over. You don't have to be a jerk about it, just post something more useful if my post wasn't good enough. ....nah ya know this doesn't even deserve a response....just Wow! is all I have to say.
Old 02-06-2008, 02:38 AM
  #47  
A.Wayne
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
 
A.Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RPM Central
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My apologies , I never said it was your calculations, i was merely attempting to show the inadequacies of the formula you presented and mistook your popinjay response as being on the offense, as your comments Well he's not building one of "these" and this You could also account for altitude change, global warming, people starving in Africa, and men horny in Canada or this if you have any common sense at all. as a" tempered " response

my apologies if not so .... by the way would you happen to have any grey poupon ?

Last edited by A.Wayne; 02-06-2008 at 03:09 AM.
Old 02-06-2008, 02:51 AM
  #48  
m42racer
Three Wheelin'
 
m42racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That formula you have choosen is about as accurate as a lucky guess, It does not account for RPM
500 bhp at 9000 rpm requires bigger injectors than 500 bhp @ 6000 rpm

Why does this not sound correct????
Old 02-06-2008, 02:54 AM
  #49  
m42racer
Three Wheelin'
 
m42racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Patrick,

If you want to know what you will need email Neil. he will tell you in a heartbeat. At least you know that information will be correct.
Old 02-06-2008, 02:56 AM
  #50  
A.Wayne
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
 
A.Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RPM Central
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m42racer
That formula you have choosen is about as accurate as a lucky guess, It does not account for RPM
500 bhp at 9000 rpm requires bigger injectors than 500 bhp @ 6000 rpm

Why does this not sound correct????
LOL,
Swing on in Mr M42 Spacer.......
When you do get beyond 500 bhp you will become more focused and the little raindrops will make more sense..

Last edited by A.Wayne; 02-06-2008 at 03:13 AM.
Old 02-06-2008, 03:41 AM
  #51  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Ooh Kay?? I think the healing process is starting to take effect. Class, can't you just taste that warm and fuzzy to atmos feeling that is flowing around here? Hahah. Anyway this is more as an education for me. I can just email Neil and get the correct answer as M42 says (despite AW's obvious admiration lol). Although I don't like to bother the busy man with my every pesky question.
As for staggered injectors, I haven't even considered this as this build is only for an interim motor that will potter around on approx. 500hp. We might do the E85 at a later date in which case we will need to uprate the fuel pump/s and possibly the injectors? as we will need to use 30% more fuel. It wouldn't be too hard to build this for over 600hp but that's not the object either. Not on this one anyway.
Old 02-06-2008, 03:41 AM
  #52  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Mikael, I was going to email you to check up on how you were going and ask about your experience with LINK. Probably still will.

Andrew, you were also on my list. I need to run a couple things by you as well. I have 83lb injectors, what do these equate to in cc's?

Duke, I spoke to Zoran yesterday and he has gone over that level on higher boost. I believe he may have experienced some head lift after that but I'll have to check.
Screw the forumla, put them on an analyser, flow them, then at a certain pressure and at a certain duty cycle you get a certain amount of fuel pumped through. I have seen stock Toyota injectors supposed to be rated at by the factory 215cc flow 275cc. I also think popular injector to power conversion rates really underestimate capacity.
Old 02-06-2008, 03:44 AM
  #53  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

If your goal is 500HP, 83lb injectors will EASILY achieve this.
Old 02-06-2008, 03:47 AM
  #54  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Ok, but then you are basically going to be running at whatever limitations that particular inj has. So at eg 80% d/c these might flow 'x' then coupled with whatever else is in the engine, this will determine the hp/tq outcome? Conversely if we put all the stuff (components) in a pile can we figure out the potential of this engine at a certain psi level? My tiny brain starts to go around in ever decreasing circles about now.
^^EDIT^^ Ok thanks Andrew that about says it all.
Old 02-06-2008, 04:03 AM
  #55  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Andrew, I've sent you an email through Rennlist as your PM's are full up.
Old 02-06-2008, 04:13 AM
  #56  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Andrew, I've sent you an email through Rennlist as your PM's are full up.
yeah I have like a thousand PM's in my box and cant be assed deleting them. Refer my avatar for directions Replied to your email...
Old 02-06-2008, 04:16 AM
  #57  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Just nuke the lot and start again.
I'm not sure where your email reply will turn up? I've not used the Rennlist email system much if ever. You can get me on my normal email which you still may have. pgarvan@bigpond.net.au
Old 02-06-2008, 04:56 AM
  #58  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Reply sent.
Old 02-06-2008, 12:39 PM
  #59  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m42racer
That formula you have choosen is about as accurate as a lucky guess, It does not account for RPM
500 bhp at 9000 rpm requires bigger injectors than 500 bhp @ 6000 rpm

Why does this not sound correct????
Imagine the engine spinning at 180000 rpm... do you still think that there is enough time frame for 1 injector to stay open say 8 ms?
Old 02-06-2008, 12:48 PM
  #60  
reyk
Intermediate
 
reyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HaHa,

Thanks A. Wayne for catching that 6000 RPM is ~ 20 ms

If I could divide, I'd be dangerous...

Reyk


Quick Reply: LINK Standalone.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:04 AM.