Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

AFM relocation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2007, 04:08 AM
  #1  
Olli Snellman
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Olli Snellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default AFM relocation

Question to all pro's; tell me advantage/disadvantage to place AFM this way:


Old 09-20-2007, 08:57 AM
  #2  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Slightly better turbo response. But you must change certain things in the chip to compensate.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 09-20-2007, 09:37 AM
  #3  
theedge
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
theedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

The best way to improve performance by relocating the AFM is to relocate the AFM to the bin....
Old 09-20-2007, 10:29 AM
  #4  
Olli Snellman
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Olli Snellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Any idea why Bosch choose another location ?
Old 09-20-2007, 10:51 AM
  #5  
rberry951
Temprarily Banned per IB
 
rberry951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,630
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Olli Snellman
Any idea why Bosch choose another location ?
I believe it was BMW that chose the location, not Bosch. Interesting setup. I think I would go one step farther and run a pipe from the turbo down in front of the passenger side wheel well and put the filter there. Some fellows have done that with the 951s. I can't really see the passenger side in front of the turbo, do you have a duct over there feeding air straight to the filter?

Regards,
Russell
Old 09-20-2007, 11:51 AM
  #6  
gjoey66
Instructor
 
gjoey66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I relocated it in my headlight bucket and drilled a hole through...then placed the filter below...before the mod the car was running 20psi getting 235 rwhp and 258 ft-lbs...afterwards I decreased the boost to 15psi...where it was supposed to be in the first place and with the new intake setup achieved 253 rwhp and 250 ft-lbs...so I gained 15 rwhp with 5 lbs less boost...but my torque dropped off slightly...probably due to the 5psi decrease in boost...overall i can actually feel the difference in the pull because i'm getting a much more linear power response...I would run it at 20 psi...but it should never have been run there in the first place...
Old 09-20-2007, 05:10 PM
  #7  
lee101315
Three Wheelin'
 
lee101315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Weehawken NJ
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Olli Snellman
Question to all pro's; tell me advantage/disadvantage to place AFM this way:


A lot of people do that when they turbo the Bmw M20/M42 engine if they are on a budget and cant afford a standalone/ piggyback fuel injection.

Is that your car? That looks like a serious top mount turbo!
Old 09-21-2007, 03:05 AM
  #8  
Olli Snellman
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Olli Snellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I believe it was BMW that chose the location, not Bosch. Interesting setup. I think I would go one step farther and run a pipe from the turbo down in front of the passenger side wheel well and put the filter there. Some fellows have done that with the 951s. I can't really see the passenger side in front of the turbo, do you have a duct over there feeding air straight to the filter?
Is that your car? That looks like a serious top mount turbo!
This is not my car, i have a 951. I just have discussed with the owner why he has plumbed it that way. It is a M42 16V engined E30 318IS. It's not a factory installation. It just have SMT6 and Garret turbo added, otherwise engine is toatlly a factory stock. Original 136 hp was risen to 200hp with 0,5bar boost.
I have not seen any factory car with Motronic/AFM hooked that way. Seems to me many BMW owners does it that way. I have seen maybe about 5-6 years ago here on Rennlist a pictures of a 951 which has AFM connected similar way.
Old 09-21-2007, 06:53 AM
  #9  
Transaxle
Instructor
 
Transaxle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Can this really work?

My understanding is that the AFM measures a volume stream (m3/h). It does not measure any density of the air (kg/m3). It should be difficult to adjust the DME with changing boost levels.

This should work with a MAF that measures the mass of the air stream (kg/h) and is able to compensate the changing air density.

Bosch placed the AFM in turbo applications on the atmospheric side to get a constant air density.
Old 09-21-2007, 07:29 PM
  #10  
lee101315
Three Wheelin'
 
lee101315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Weehawken NJ
Posts: 1,583
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well, it will work ok under boost... the afm door just blows right open.

It's ok for low boost/ low power applications, but that setup will never allow that turbo to realize its full potential.

Get an aftermarket fuel/timing setup and it will make a big difference
Old 09-23-2007, 08:17 AM
  #11  
Olli Snellman
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
Olli Snellman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 4,479
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Get an aftermarket fuel/timing setup and it will make a big difference
As i wrote earlier, this is NOT my car. I have a 951.



Quick Reply: AFM relocation



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:19 PM.