Who is running water/meth?
#31
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can inject before or after the IC, it doesn't really matter.
Slight differences are: if you inject before, there will be slightly less pressure drop through the IC (a good thing). If you inject after, the total heat loss will be greater
There will be no puddling in the IC if you inject before; the combination of hot air coming straight from the turbo (easy evaporation) and high velocity will see to that.
Slight differences are: if you inject before, there will be slightly less pressure drop through the IC (a good thing). If you inject after, the total heat loss will be greater
There will be no puddling in the IC if you inject before; the combination of hot air coming straight from the turbo (easy evaporation) and high velocity will see to that.
#32
Rennlist Member
Charlie944, Nice setup. Keep your eyes on the boost activated switch you are using. The manufacturer recommends against using it in the engine bay. Many WI kits include it as it's inexpensive in comparison the the sealed units.
The 924 Carrera GT scoop on the hood will provide a bunch of air flow on that area where I have the boost activation switch at.
In the last picture the brass device with the wires is the pressure detector switch that controlls the light in the cabin telling me everything is working.
#33
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Charlie, I used the wrong terminology, I am referring to the unit in the above picture. It's the switch that detects the pressure. While I'm warning you about stuff, don't assume that if the same switch does not give you a warning, everything is ok. You could have a clogged nozzle, lots of pressure in line but no flow.
I hope I don't come across as picking on your kit, I'm not. I just spent lots of time evaluating various systems, talked to various parts suppliers while designing a fail-safe kit. I'm just raising yellow flags so you are aware of the possibilities.
I hope I don't come across as picking on your kit, I'm not. I just spent lots of time evaluating various systems, talked to various parts suppliers while designing a fail-safe kit. I'm just raising yellow flags so you are aware of the possibilities.
#34
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Hey John:
Is there any better solution? Perhaps using a flow-meter as a fail-safe in conjuction with the pump duty cycle (something like that)? I too worry about clogged nozzles and how to detect such a failure - especially in a port injection scenerio (one cyl. clogs - even partially - and the main flow still reads 80-90% flow and poof! you burn a valve). Then what if a rupture happens down line from the meter? All the flow in the world but not getting to the nozzle. Perhaps just a LARGE knock light in the dash so you can get out of it before real damage occurs? I am really curious what you think is prudent in this situation.
Right now Snow says there flow-meter solution is unavailable.
Is there any better solution? Perhaps using a flow-meter as a fail-safe in conjuction with the pump duty cycle (something like that)? I too worry about clogged nozzles and how to detect such a failure - especially in a port injection scenerio (one cyl. clogs - even partially - and the main flow still reads 80-90% flow and poof! you burn a valve). Then what if a rupture happens down line from the meter? All the flow in the world but not getting to the nozzle. Perhaps just a LARGE knock light in the dash so you can get out of it before real damage occurs? I am really curious what you think is prudent in this situation.
Right now Snow says there flow-meter solution is unavailable.
#35
Rennlist Member
I've used pressure switches in the past.
The biggest problem I've encountered with them is their inconsistencies when exposed to heat. Even if you set them at a certain activation point, It'll change depending on the ambient temps (depending on where you locate the switch), or underhood temps (hot day, city traffic, etc.)
As far as the clogged nozzzle thing; most of the kits all come with fine filters, and if you keep everthing clean, I don't see why there would ever be a problem.
Toddk911,
yes, you will benefit from a cooler charge; but keep in mind it will only cool down to the condensation point, so it's not like the more water will automatically make your charge denser.
The biggest problem I've encountered with them is their inconsistencies when exposed to heat. Even if you set them at a certain activation point, It'll change depending on the ambient temps (depending on where you locate the switch), or underhood temps (hot day, city traffic, etc.)
As far as the clogged nozzzle thing; most of the kits all come with fine filters, and if you keep everthing clean, I don't see why there would ever be a problem.
Toddk911,
yes, you will benefit from a cooler charge; but keep in mind it will only cool down to the condensation point, so it's not like the more water will automatically make your charge denser.
#37
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Hey John:
Is there any better solution? Perhaps using a flow-meter as a fail-safe in conjuction with the pump duty cycle (something like that)? I too worry about clogged nozzles and how to detect such a failure - especially in a port injection scenerio (one cyl. clogs - even partially - and the main flow still reads 80-90% flow and poof! you burn a valve). Then what if a rupture happens down line from the meter? All the flow in the world but not getting to the nozzle. Perhaps just a LARGE knock light in the dash so you can get out of it before real damage occurs? I am really curious what you think is prudent in this situation.
Right now Snow says there flow-meter solution is unavailable.
Is there any better solution? Perhaps using a flow-meter as a fail-safe in conjuction with the pump duty cycle (something like that)? I too worry about clogged nozzles and how to detect such a failure - especially in a port injection scenerio (one cyl. clogs - even partially - and the main flow still reads 80-90% flow and poof! you burn a valve). Then what if a rupture happens down line from the meter? All the flow in the world but not getting to the nozzle. Perhaps just a LARGE knock light in the dash so you can get out of it before real damage occurs? I am really curious what you think is prudent in this situation.
Right now Snow says there flow-meter solution is unavailable.
- Status 1: Pump or solenoid activated (activation based on whatever conditions you want)
- Status 2: Pressure in the line before the nozzle
For the system to work properly Status #1 AND #2 must both be TRUE (actually there is a timing variable in there, but let's not worry about it for now).
If Condition #1 is TRUE but #2 FAILS = No water in the line.
If condition #1 is FALSE but #2 is TRUE = Clogged Nozzle
In a fail-safe system there are many conditions to detect, not just 2. The system I designed will automatically revert engine management & boost control to a predetermined state where it's safe to operate without WI.
The system I was designing, incorporated knock for feedback as well.
Under some conditions, even a operational WI cannot save you. ex: Nozzle sized fine for the boost you tune it for, but you run more boost! Your WI is inadequate and you must revert to a fail-safe mode.
As you can tell, it's easy to build a WI system. But to build a fail-safe system it's not as simple and will cost more $ than the generic system most get excited about.
#38
Rennlist Member
Charlie, I used the wrong terminology, I am referring to the unit in the above picture. It's the switch that detects the pressure. While I'm warning you about stuff, don't assume that if the same switch does not give you a warning, everything is ok. You could have a clogged nozzle, lots of pressure in line but no flow.
I hope I don't come across as picking on your kit, I'm not. I just spent lots of time evaluating various systems, talked to various parts suppliers while designing a fail-safe kit. I'm just raising yellow flags so you are aware of the possibilities.
I hope I don't come across as picking on your kit, I'm not. I just spent lots of time evaluating various systems, talked to various parts suppliers while designing a fail-safe kit. I'm just raising yellow flags so you are aware of the possibilities.
I have thought about a clogged nozzle and therefore having pressure but no flow or inadequate flow. Right now I only have a 2-bar absolute MAP sensor so anything over 15psi of boost at this point will not happen. I am looking to reduce EGT's and advance some timing, but it will be a gradual process.
The stg 2 kit I have does come with a 20 micron filter that is placed between the tank and the pump.
The injector nozzle itself has a another screen as well.
Thanks again!!
#39
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Pinging/detonation is a very good feedback mechanism for problems with a WI or PWI system and I rely on the audible type with ”bio-feedback” (=me). I can assure you, from the few times I have run out of water it is very audible. The temporary cure, until the problem is fixed, is a well-controlled right foot. In a race situation with a helmet on, that does not work though.
I believe that the ”bio-feedback” is fully adequate for those who 1. listens to their car whenever boost exceeds a certain level, 2. do not believe a few pings will kill the engine, 3. have no racetrack events or 4. have racetrack events not requiring WI (lower boost and/or race gas).
So far all is just fine with my engine after 2+ years with a primitively controlled PWI system, 25 psi boost and 87 octane pump gas (91 octane for the occasional track event).
PWI systems actually has a self “cleaning nozzle” feature, since the individual ports have synchronized out of phase pressure oscillations, which whenever the PWI system is not engaged pumps first water then air through the nozzles and lines in between them.
Foreign particles can be filtered out, even better in a re-circulating system similar to the fuel system. However I would be more concerned about dissolved minerals such as calcium (hard water), which often clogs up my external IC spray, but never the internal port spray. I suspect that the slight oil mist in the intake makes deposits in the port nozzles even more difficult.
Laust
I believe that the ”bio-feedback” is fully adequate for those who 1. listens to their car whenever boost exceeds a certain level, 2. do not believe a few pings will kill the engine, 3. have no racetrack events or 4. have racetrack events not requiring WI (lower boost and/or race gas).
So far all is just fine with my engine after 2+ years with a primitively controlled PWI system, 25 psi boost and 87 octane pump gas (91 octane for the occasional track event).
Foreign particles can be filtered out, even better in a re-circulating system similar to the fuel system. However I would be more concerned about dissolved minerals such as calcium (hard water), which often clogs up my external IC spray, but never the internal port spray. I suspect that the slight oil mist in the intake makes deposits in the port nozzles even more difficult.
Laust
#41
Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was thinking about what voltage you would set the Snow kit at and stumbled upon this... http://www.snowperformance.net/product.php?pk=8
Its a kit that detects boost rather then MAF voltage. This way I can set it at 14psi for when the 26/6 is really getting hot and not have to worry about it using all of the water/meth when doing around town driving. Then agian I see 15psi on my way to work everyday haha...
Its a kit that detects boost rather then MAF voltage. This way I can set it at 14psi for when the 26/6 is really getting hot and not have to worry about it using all of the water/meth when doing around town driving. Then agian I see 15psi on my way to work everyday haha...
#42
Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sammamish, WA
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
their stage 1 (also boost controlled) is also only $250.
I am looking to cool my intake temps and possibly run a little leaner while under boost (from 11.8-12.2 now to 12.2 to 12.4 afr). For people who ONLY want to lower intake temps, this kit has everything you need and is very safe (since you will not be changing your afr, timing, etc..)
I am looking to cool my intake temps and possibly run a little leaner while under boost (from 11.8-12.2 now to 12.2 to 12.4 afr). For people who ONLY want to lower intake temps, this kit has everything you need and is very safe (since you will not be changing your afr, timing, etc..)