Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Ultra-secret spy shots of the newly-redesigned "Laust vacuum manifold"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2007 | 10:13 PM
  #46  
Laust Pedersen's Avatar
Laust Pedersen
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,357
Likes: 8
From: Menifee, CA
Default

Originally Posted by tedesco
from my experience I can only reccoment NOT to use such a manifould for all the vac lines. I would rather suggest the complete opposite. Reason for that is quite simple: There are a few "consumers" of vac and a few componets that only need the vac (or better mani pressure) as a signal. The biggest "consumer" is certainly the wastegate supply with its own line but also the recirculation valve needs vac flow due to its piston volume. Components like fuel pressure regulator, boost pressure sensor in the DMA/KLR... need only very little vac flow and use vac only as a signal. What happens when you connect all compnents that need vac to only one fitting is that locally, just in the fitting the vac pressure does not anymore corrospond to the mani pressure which it should do all the time. Reason for that is that due to the temporary high demand for vac flow during load changes the fitting is a restriction and as a result there is a difference in pressure in the signal lines compared to the manifould. DME/KLR receive wrong pressure data and fuel pressure is wrong as well. Certainly only for a small time under transient conditions but in my eyes a vac manifould sonds like a bad idea. This statement is a result of my own practial experience so far.
Good grief, I’ll spare you my immediate characterization of your post and just mention that your claim that the VM presents a flow restriction is dead wrong.
Item 1 in post # 35 here should have given you more than a clue in that regard and in my very long thread on the VM that discussion is taken up in more detail.

Laust
Old 04-16-2007 | 09:03 PM
  #47  
5speed300's Avatar
5speed300
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Update on this? Im going to need a vacuum manifold soon!
Old 04-16-2007 | 09:14 PM
  #48  
nize's Avatar
nize
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
From: seattle, washington - usa
Default

yeah daniel, where is this? i want mine now.
Old 04-16-2007 | 09:28 PM
  #49  
The DareDevil's Avatar
The DareDevil
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,608
Likes: 13
From: Montreal, QC
Default Original

I installed the original manifold today. It really simplifies the vacuum line routing under the intake manifold, and it looks hot!
Attached Images   
Old 04-16-2007 | 09:41 PM
  #50  
sharky47's Avatar
sharky47
Thread Starter
Set to Full-Auto
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,032
Likes: 126
From: Fema region 6
Default

I havn't forgotten about this, it's in line - I can only move as fast as the machines........
Old 04-16-2007 | 10:21 PM
  #51  
BlacknRedGT's Avatar
BlacknRedGT
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX 78154
Default

Make some in black if possible..... to go along with the powdercoating that your gonna do
Old 04-16-2007 | 11:11 PM
  #52  
sharky47's Avatar
sharky47
Thread Starter
Set to Full-Auto
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,032
Likes: 126
From: Fema region 6
Default

Well, mine will be aluminum - so they can be anodized in whatever color people want!
Old 04-17-2007 | 02:30 AM
  #53  
Driftomagnifico's Avatar
Driftomagnifico
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
Default

Looking good Dan.



Quick Reply: Ultra-secret spy shots of the newly-redesigned "Laust vacuum manifold"



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:43 PM.