Stock Valve springs vs. Lindsey Racing springs
#1
Stock Valve springs vs. Lindsey Racing springs
I am looking to upgrading my valve springs because of broken OEM springs on a 87 Turbo with only 108k.
Anyone have an opinion or recommendation on the LR valve springs with Titanium retainers? is over $450 dollars worth it?
Thanks in advance...
-BB
Anyone have an opinion or recommendation on the LR valve springs with Titanium retainers? is over $450 dollars worth it?
Thanks in advance...
-BB
#2
There's not really any point unless you plan on revving higher. Do a different cam, maybe a port job or some other head work, retuned chips to support it and rev a bit higher then it will be worthwhile. For that price, you'd be better off getting something like the Webcam #274 cam and sticking with stock valve springs if you had a choice between the 2. At least then there would be a noticeable improvement in top-end performance.
#3
I would think the titanium retainers are for higher rpm applications. You should pick your springs based on the amount of boost you plan to run. Stock springs go up to 16psi. Ideally the 274 web cam with springs for 18psi would be a pretty sweet upgrade.
#4
I would not advise going with titanium retainers, the few grams you save is not likely going to allow you to rev the engine significantly higher. This is not my main reason however; I have a good friend who has an e30 M3 which has been using titanium retainers for <10k miles, I saw the car with the head off this past weekend and you could see significant wear on the retainers themselves. I'm not sure exactly what caused the wear to occur, but I know they were installed correctly, leading me to believe that the titanium retainers were just not as durable as the stock ones. Now, this is a single case in a different car, but I know when I eventually rebuild my engine and put in new springs/lifters etc, I won't be using titanium retainers
#5
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
From: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Originally Posted by RKD in OKC
I would think the titanium retainers are for higher rpm applications. You should pick your springs based on the amount of boost you plan to run. Stock springs go up to 16psi. Ideally the 274 web cam with springs for 18psi would be a pretty sweet upgrade.
#6
Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzi
I am looking to upgrading my valve springs because of broken OEM springs on a 87 Turbo with only 108k. Anyone have an opinion or recommendation on the LR valve springs with Titanium retainers? is over $450 dollars worth it? Thanks in advance...
-BB
-BB
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by toddk911
What kind of revs are you planning on Rolex???
#10
Originally Posted by RKD in OKC
Yep, that's the design limit of the factory valve train.
As with any design it can be pushed, but to what end and for how long?
As with any design it can be pushed, but to what end and for how long?
-J
#11
Well that was a bit of a “mumbo jumbo” explanation, unless someone can explain at which crank angle the pressure difference across the intake valve is at critical levels and don’t forget to take the exhaust back pressure into consideration.
If you remove the rpm limiter and over-rev the engine then that is a problem, but the boost is of little relevance for valve float.
Laust
If you remove the rpm limiter and over-rev the engine then that is a problem, but the boost is of little relevance for valve float.
Laust
#12
Originally Posted by Laust Pedersen
Well that was a bit of a “mumbo jumbo” explanation, unless someone can explain at which crank angle the pressure difference across the intake valve is at critical levels and don’t forget to take the exhaust back pressure into consideration.
If you remove the rpm limiter and over-rev the engine then that is a problem, but the boost is of little relevance for valve float.
Laust
If you remove the rpm limiter and over-rev the engine then that is a problem, but the boost is of little relevance for valve float.
Laust
#13
Originally Posted by RKD in OKC
YEAH, those cam designers don't have any idea what they are talking about, it's all smoke and mirrors to sell more springs with new cams.
#14
Originally Posted by Laust Pedersen
Well that was a bit of a “mumbo jumbo” explanation, unless someone can explain at which crank angle the pressure difference across the intake valve is at critical levels and don’t forget to take the exhaust back pressure into consideration.
If you remove the rpm limiter and over-rev the engine then that is a problem, but the boost is of little relevance for valve float.
Laust
If you remove the rpm limiter and over-rev the engine then that is a problem, but the boost is of little relevance for valve float.
Laust
Well put. When are people around here going to learn that you have to take everything with a grain of salt, and especially when it is "info" provided by someone personally invested in the associated product. Max rpm is more important to determine what valve spring rate you'll want. LR's explanation really offers little in the way of a truely technical explanation of why, plus they don't really show any evidence to support it.
As far as Ti retainers go, you have to be careful when purchasing them. There is a large amount of sub-par quality Ti retainers out there on the market. Ideally, you want to get a quality retainer that is properly coated. Ti components without coatings can be extremely abrasive and cause serious amounts of wear. LR doesn't mention what brand their Ti retainers are, but I'd try to stick with reputable companies like Ferrea. Proper coatings are vital for many internal Ti components. Many of the cheap Ti retainers you might commonly see for various engines aren't even coated, so watch out for that. I'd ask LR if their retainers are coated.
Valves are another subject we could spend ages discussing. Just FYI but, Ti valves can actually be very reliable and long lasting with the proper valve seats, coatings, etc. There are many new-tech coatings and processes for coating Ti components that lead to a substantially increased life compared to what used to be available. Without coatings, Ti valves tend to eat the seats pretty quickly. In general though, the use of much of these exotic alloys is really a waste of time and money on a street motor. The improvements in tensile strength, heat dissipation capabilities, etc are sometimes minimal when compared to other alloys like SS or Chromoly. On a dedicated track car, those minimal improvements might be more than worthwhile. On a street car it will normally just leave you significantly lighter in the wallet without too much of an improvement. IMO, stick with stock or Chromoly retainers and upgrade the valve springs if you want to rev to something like 7k rpm, otherwise stick with stock springs. I see a lot of people around here get caught up with the ideas of using all of these exotic alloys and components when 9 times out of 10 there is no real worthwhile difference for a street car, and a significantly cheaper less exotic component/alloy might still give you ~90-95% of the performance. That's cool if you want to overbuild, but there are certainly far cheaper ways to go about it that still provide you comparable performance. That being said, don't ever waste the time with Ti valves in a street motor. The typical 21-4N alloy SS valves you normally see on the market are all you'd ever really need to upgrade to in a street motor. It's nice to think about using "cool" stuff like Inconnel or Ti valves but 99% of the time it just isn't practical for most people unless you really just feel like building a $10,000 valvetrain.
#15
Originally Posted by RKD in OKC
YEAH, those cam designers don't have any idea what they are talking about, it's all smoke and mirrors to sell more springs with new cams.