The Saga Continues....this time more valves, more displacement
#61
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by NZ951
I love you Pete, but i think your mean CFM, not HP
Actually as long as you dont press bend (i.e. Mandrel bend), the loss isnt massive. A 90 degree mandrel bend will flow about 0.6% less than the same length straight pipe.
Actually as long as you dont press bend (i.e. Mandrel bend), the loss isnt massive. A 90 degree mandrel bend will flow about 0.6% less than the same length straight pipe.
Patrick
#63
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by NZ951
J. Edgar, 2000 "21st Century Performance", Figure 6.2 [pp. 148], Clockwork Media.
#64
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will use 68 mm piping from IC to TB and 63.5mm piping from turbo to interooler. all togetehr i will have
before intercooler on turbo side - one 90 degree bend and two 45 degree bents
After intercooler I most likeli have one 45 degree bent and 2 90 degree bents
So totally I have 3 90 degree bents and 3 45 degree bents
I hope zoran dont mind that I put up a picture about hes engine bay.. My IC is a bit different but piping will be similar!
before intercooler on turbo side - one 90 degree bend and two 45 degree bents
After intercooler I most likeli have one 45 degree bent and 2 90 degree bents
So totally I have 3 90 degree bents and 3 45 degree bents
I hope zoran dont mind that I put up a picture about hes engine bay.. My IC is a bit different but piping will be similar!
#66
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Porschefile
Is that a carbon fiber cam cover I see? Sweet! Your engine is looking great Markus!
#67
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey
I have now collected some cilicone bents and some SS bents to come up with proper IC setup will see how it goes! For those who are planning 16 valve projects.. its a tight fit , but nothing that big..really!
I also added one 3" resonator (approx 1m long) into the exhaust system, just to make it more convinient to drive in the city..
Now, can anyone tell where the stock bottom end can be revved (I have 951 con.rods and upgraded valve springs) I know that the the head is good at least for some 8000 rpm action but I was thinking that bottom end max 7000? I did balanace everything but how does the stock 951 rods will tolerate the extra weight coming from 104mm 968 pistons witch are a bit heavier then stock 951 ones? I knew that in stock 951 motor the main problem where the heavy valvetrain and lifters but this is not the case here! I doubt that I have powerband problems with with that 0,82 GT35R but still what do you guis think?
Also have any of you guys had fuel feed problems during hard cornering in the tracks? Have any of you guys built additional surge-tank for fuel?
http://sdsefi.com/techsurge.htm.
I have now collected some cilicone bents and some SS bents to come up with proper IC setup will see how it goes! For those who are planning 16 valve projects.. its a tight fit , but nothing that big..really!
I also added one 3" resonator (approx 1m long) into the exhaust system, just to make it more convinient to drive in the city..
Now, can anyone tell where the stock bottom end can be revved (I have 951 con.rods and upgraded valve springs) I know that the the head is good at least for some 8000 rpm action but I was thinking that bottom end max 7000? I did balanace everything but how does the stock 951 rods will tolerate the extra weight coming from 104mm 968 pistons witch are a bit heavier then stock 951 ones? I knew that in stock 951 motor the main problem where the heavy valvetrain and lifters but this is not the case here! I doubt that I have powerband problems with with that 0,82 GT35R but still what do you guis think?
Also have any of you guys had fuel feed problems during hard cornering in the tracks? Have any of you guys built additional surge-tank for fuel?
http://sdsefi.com/techsurge.htm.
#70
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
Anything over 6500 and you are starting to gamble with the rod beraings. Its a little different with each engine due to casting differences. Other varaibles enter in to it - oil temp, G forces and possibly the phase of the moon - but in the end the risk goes up after you pass 6500. The main issue is oil pump cavatation.
#71
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes I have crank scraper installed!
THis is the intercooler solution, seems that I can use some of the old piping from last year.. The piece you see in the picture is originally the pipe what was used last year as a return from IC to throttle body so I have to remove Intake temp sensor and put the banjo bolts for wastegate boost feed instead
The small pipe end you see attached to the IC piping will be used for idle speed controll valve...
Here you can see where where the pipe was originally used, made
THis is the intercooler solution, seems that I can use some of the old piping from last year.. The piece you see in the picture is originally the pipe what was used last year as a return from IC to throttle body so I have to remove Intake temp sensor and put the banjo bolts for wastegate boost feed instead
The small pipe end you see attached to the IC piping will be used for idle speed controll valve...
Here you can see where where the pipe was originally used, made
#75
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey
Have any of you experienced with higher comp.ratio vs. bigger turbo.. How much boost can I run with 9,5:1? I am just calculating where should GT35R 0,82 should get me with 17 PSI.. I think that should be maximum for that engine!
Markus
then again...not so many 16 valve projects here..
Have any of you experienced with higher comp.ratio vs. bigger turbo.. How much boost can I run with 9,5:1? I am just calculating where should GT35R 0,82 should get me with 17 PSI.. I think that should be maximum for that engine!
Markus
then again...not so many 16 valve projects here..
Last edited by Markus951; 06-07-2007 at 05:49 AM.