Raceware or ARP Head Bolts
#16
Originally Posted by TRP951
have you seen the special tool 543hp dyno run video? It shows the head lifting which he is using stock studs there
#17
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
From: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Originally Posted by tommo951
G'day to you Mr Tool !!
They ocassionaly do auctions on ebay then you can get them for $179
Here is a link http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...6647881&rd=1,1
All their contact details on there
Cheers
Tom
They ocassionaly do auctions on ebay then you can get them for $179
Here is a link http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...6647881&rd=1,1
All their contact details on there
Cheers
Tom
#19
Can someone confirm the procedure for installation of these? Does it require you to assemble and install the engine, turn it on, get it to temp, turn it off and let it cool, and then pull the top off it to get back to the ARP's just to re-torque them? This seems excessive and expensive. About 6 hours labour the next day?
#20
Originally Posted by 333pg333
Can someone confirm the procedure for installation of these? Does it require you to assemble and install the engine, turn it on, get it to temp, turn it off and let it cool, and then pull the top off it to get back to the ARP's just to re-torque them? This seems excessive and expensive. About 6 hours labour the next day?
#22
In the interests of fairness, Raceware are fine, but their standard kit only covers 951's up to '88 inclusive & therefore the threads were incompatible with my UK 1990 car.
Apparently their stud kit for '89 - '91 Porsche 951's are special order only.
Apparently their stud kit for '89 - '91 Porsche 951's are special order only.
#23
Sounds like you just got the wrong ones. I've used them in plenty of cars, and have never had a problem. I think all the 951 studs are the same through '89, inclusive. When I called Raceware for '89 2.7 studs (twice), they shipped them almost immediately and they fit like a glove, so "special order" wasn't really a big deal.
The following users liked this post:
Jay Wellwood (07-30-2020)
#24
The 44.52 engine was manufactured 1988- 91 but apparently the stud threads changed at some point in '89.
I was stupid enough to think the the studs described as working in any 944 83'-88' and 944 Turbo would be fine in my '90 - WRONG.
I've never seen anyone mention this - if your 951/952 is MY 89 - 91 the existing Raceware studs will not thread - you need to place a special order.
An expensive mistake.
I was stupid enough to think the the studs described as working in any 944 83'-88' and 944 Turbo would be fine in my '90 - WRONG.
I've never seen anyone mention this - if your 951/952 is MY 89 - 91 the existing Raceware studs will not thread - you need to place a special order.
An expensive mistake.
#25
The 44.52 engine was manufactured 1988- 91 but apparently the stud threads changed at some point in '89.
I was stupid enough to think the the studs described as working in any 944 83'-88' and 944 Turbo would be fine in my '90 - WRONG.
I've never seen anyone mention this - if your 951/952 is MY 89 - 91 the existing Raceware studs will not thread - you need to place a special order.
An expensive mistake.
I was stupid enough to think the the studs described as working in any 944 83'-88' and 944 Turbo would be fine in my '90 - WRONG.
I've never seen anyone mention this - if your 951/952 is MY 89 - 91 the existing Raceware studs will not thread - you need to place a special order.
An expensive mistake.
Porsche lists the same part number, 944 101 197 00, for the M44.51 and M44.52, at least in the US-version of PET. I can't speak to the post-'89 turbos outside the U.S., but I've never seen or heard of a US-spec 951 with different threads, regardless of year. What part number or threads did your '90 need, if not 944 101 197 00?
The following users liked this post:
Jay Wellwood (07-30-2020)
The following users liked this post:
Jay Wellwood (07-30-2020)
#27
It turns out that some of 1990-91 951/952 blocks used 968 main bearing studs with a 12 x 1.75mm thread pitch compared to the standard 12 x 1.50mm thread pitch.
Unfortunately mine was one of those!
I've got the factory main bearing studs back in now but have sourced the Raceware 968 studs.
There's a strong argument for using new OEM head studs as they're a stretch fastener which does well accommodating the expansion & contraction of the block & cylinder head.
Unfortunately mine was one of those!
I've got the factory main bearing studs back in now but have sourced the Raceware 968 studs.
There's a strong argument for using new OEM head studs as they're a stretch fastener which does well accommodating the expansion & contraction of the block & cylinder head.
#28
It turns out that some of 1990-91 951/952 blocks used 968 main bearing studs with a 12 x 1.75mm thread pitch compared to the standard 12 x 1.50mm thread pitch.
Unfortunately mine was one of those!
I've got the factory main bearing studs back in now but have sourced the Raceware 968 studs.
There's a strong argument for using new OEM head studs as they're a stretch fastener which does well accommodating the expansion & contraction of the block & cylinder head.
Unfortunately mine was one of those!
I've got the factory main bearing studs back in now but have sourced the Raceware 968 studs.
There's a strong argument for using new OEM head studs as they're a stretch fastener which does well accommodating the expansion & contraction of the block & cylinder head.
Ah, main studs.... My comments were limited to the head studs, which I believe are the same on all US-spec 951's. If you say the main studs are different on the '90 and '91 turbo motors, I have no basis to doubt you. We don't have those here, unfortunately.
#29
Correcto mundo - the '90-'91 head studs are same as for all the 944's but it seems they transitioned to the 12 x 1.75mm pitch thread on the main bearing studs
in advance of adopting this thread size for the 968 which would have been nearing the end of its development.
in advance of adopting this thread size for the 968 which would have been nearing the end of its development.
#30
I’m surprised no one has mentioned race wares spec of 65 ftlbs vs arp that calls for 100ft lbs? And the fact that arp have the nice Allen head on top to turn the stud... I’ve used both, I like arp. As far as the mains, not needed.. I do wish someone made a bottom end nut and washer kit and the small bolts.. cause I keep losing them in my parts bins..