Running with or without belt covers?
#2
Two words, "interference engine". Something happen to your timing belt and you will need major head work, and probably some pistons two. At best.
I wouldn't run my car parked in a clean room without covers.
Regards,
Russell
I wouldn't run my car parked in a clean room without covers.
Regards,
Russell
#3
I have run for weeks at a time without them without inicident. My only concern was a rock or some other thing bouncing up in there & causing a belt failure. Driving on a gravel road would be extremely dangerous. It could cause the timing belt to sieze & fail which would at the very least bend valves and potentially other major failures .
#5
If you want to inspect the belts just leave the top one off. That way when you go to sell the car you can put it back together easily and not look like a lazy hack job mechanic. At least leave the rear cover on, so that you have options later on.
#6
me too, off. I mean damn, if you have the bat wing or splitter on, your fine. Track car, they've been off for almost 4 years.
A lot of people like the clean look, I like changing my belts real quick.
A lot of people like the clean look, I like changing my belts real quick.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by rberry951
Two words, "interference engine". Something happen to your timing belt and you will need major head work, and probably some pistons two. At best.
I wouldn't run my car parked in a clean room without covers.
Regards,
Russell
I wouldn't run my car parked in a clean room without covers.
Regards,
Russell
Laust Pederson (rennlister) did my pistons.
#9
Originally Posted by Buckaroo Banzi
Sorry my bad... I forgot to mention that I DO have a interference motor.
Laust Pederson (rennlister) did my pistons.
Laust Pederson (rennlister) did my pistons.
You dew? I understand the logic of using the covers, I'm afraid I don't see any logic behind leaving them off.
Regards,
Russell
#10
I agree off with the covers
I agree with you folks that say "leave them off"
I think it as a measure of function, it's a hell of a lot easier to check or repair the belts with the covers OFF... I plan a cross country " break in the motor trip" and even with a Interference motor if a belt does break it could be replaced on the road.
thanks for the feedback...
I think it as a measure of function, it's a hell of a lot easier to check or repair the belts with the covers OFF... I plan a cross country " break in the motor trip" and even with a Interference motor if a belt does break it could be replaced on the road.
thanks for the feedback...
#11
Originally Posted by rberry951
You dew? I understand the logic of using the covers, I'm afraid I don't see any logic behind leaving them off.
Regards,
Russell
Regards,
Russell
#13
But seriously, you are exposing seals, belts, roller bearings to undesireable debri and the elements. What do you do if it's raining, just don't drive? Easier to repair the belts? With what, duct tape?
I don't get it, if my belts are making the right whining sound and I know they've been properly tensioned there's just no reason to see them and expose all that stuff to whatever is on the road.
I don't get it, if my belts are making the right whining sound and I know they've been properly tensioned there's just no reason to see them and expose all that stuff to whatever is on the road.
#15
Originally Posted by rberry951
But seriously, you are exposing seals, belts, roller bearings to undesireable debri and the elements. .
Not that big a risk IMHO