FS 60-1 HIFI
03-02-2006 | 02:07 AM
#2
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles
I think you're crazy for getting rid of that turbo.
The compressor will support a lot more power than what you made on that dyno chart. Plus the turbine looks to be on the large side for a 2.5L, so it would spool even faster on a 2.8L.
Spend the money on a good cam and a N/A ported head. That's money much better spent.
TonyG
The compressor will support a lot more power than what you made on that dyno chart. Plus the turbine looks to be on the large side for a 2.5L, so it would spool even faster on a 2.8L.
Spend the money on a good cam and a N/A ported head. That's money much better spent.
TonyG
03-02-2006 | 02:19 AM
#4
Thread Starter
Race Car
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,591
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo,CO
Originally Posted by TonyG
I think you're crazy for getting rid of that turbo.
The compressor will support a lot more power than what you made on that dyno chart. Plus the turbine looks to be on the large side for a 2.5L, so it would spool even faster on a 2.8L.
Spend the money on a good cam and a N/A ported head. That's money much better spent.
TonyG
The compressor will support a lot more power than what you made on that dyno chart. Plus the turbine looks to be on the large side for a 2.5L, so it would spool even faster on a 2.8L.
Spend the money on a good cam and a N/A ported head. That's money much better spent.
TonyG
