Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Why did Porsche de-tune the 951??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2006 | 12:36 PM
  #61  
JDeitz951's Avatar
JDeitz951
Addict
Rennlist
Lifetime Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey Shore
Default

No, you misunderstand. The part about the 911 guys saying "I WANT ONE OF THOSE", that's a pipe dream.
Old 02-15-2006 | 01:03 PM
  #62  
streckfu's's Avatar
streckfu's
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 77,320
Likes: 668
Default

I know a few guys that own both a 911 and a 951. The 951 is the track car for each....
Old 02-15-2006 | 01:16 PM
  #63  
toddk911's Avatar
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
From: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Default

LOL, oh ok. I was like "what is he talking about????"

Old 02-15-2006 | 01:53 PM
  #64  
lart951's Avatar
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,451
Likes: 95
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by JDeitz951
No, you misunderstand. The part about the 911 guys saying "I WANT ONE OF THOSE", that's a pipe dream.
Deitz, how dare you accuse todk911 of smoking drugs. Just check his picture does he looks like a drug addict to you? Btw he is on the left side of the pcit.
Attached Images  
Old 02-15-2006 | 02:05 PM
  #65  
JDeitz951's Avatar
JDeitz951
Addict
Rennlist
Lifetime Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey Shore
Default

Originally Posted by streckfu's951
I know a few guys that own both a 911 and a 951. The 951 is the track car for each....
Someday I'll be the guy with the '06 Cayman in the driveway,the '86 951 on the trailer, and the wife's '02 Cayenne towing it. Like in 2020. Now maybe I'm the one smoking something.

(I can see Lart firing up Photoshop as he reads this)

Last edited by JDeitz951; 02-15-2006 at 03:09 PM.
Old 02-15-2006 | 02:50 PM
  #66  
lart951's Avatar
lart951
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,451
Likes: 95
From: California
Default

Deitz, I was going to do it, but iam going to the dyno in a few minutes. Today is my b-day and I am installing some new gizmos in my car. Brb later for fun and to post dyno graph as well.
Old 02-15-2006 | 05:49 PM
  #67  
turbinek's Avatar
turbinek
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

He guys 965 c2 turbo 558 hp just 2 valves one turbo - 60 -200 km/h a little bit quicker than CBR900 RR Fireblade.
Time 0 - 200 8.5 seconds...

Why was no one else in F1 using 5 valves per cylinder than Yamaha?
Let us see oh no one did not Ferrari, not Honda, not Mercedes (sorry Illmor Swiss), ...
Old 02-15-2006 | 06:02 PM
  #68  
mroberts's Avatar
mroberts
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
From: Canberra
Default

Originally Posted by streckfu's951
I know a few guys that own both a 911 and a 951. The 951 is the track car for each....
Yeah, but how many people track 951s because they give similar performance but at a MUCH lower cost than a 911. A 951 is basically a disposable track car. You can't even get into a 911 for less than about $15k, and one that will be comparable in power / performance to a 951 will cost you closer to $20k.
Old 02-15-2006 | 07:35 PM
  #69  
Gator_86_951's Avatar
Gator_86_951
Spell Checker
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,357
Likes: 393
From: Alexandria, VA
Default

Originally Posted by mroberts
Yeah, but how many people track 951s because they give similar performance but at a MUCH lower cost than a 911. A 951 is basically a disposable track car. You can't even get into a 911 for less than about $15k, and one that will be comparable in power / performance to a 951 will cost you closer to $20k.
Exactly. I love my 951 and I intend to spec race it when I get out of school. But, it is no well prepared 911. It has a 2.5L water-cooled wet-sump engine with a balance shaft. I happen to drive it without much regard to whether it gets balled up or not for that very reason. Sorry.
Old 02-15-2006 | 09:45 PM
  #70  
FSAEracer03's Avatar
FSAEracer03
TRB0 GUY
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,769
Likes: 0
From: Daphne, AL
Default

Originally Posted by turbinek
He guys 965 c2 turbo 558 hp just 2 valves one turbo - 60 -200 km/h a little bit quicker than CBR900 RR Fireblade.
Time 0 - 200 8.5 seconds...

Why was no one else in F1 using 5 valves per cylinder than Yamaha?
Let us see oh no one did not Ferrari, not Honda, not Mercedes (sorry Illmor Swiss), ...
Giving an example of a 2-valve, turbo car vs. a crotch rocket is like claiming you have a larger ***** because you wear italian leather shoes... that doesn't really mean anything in theory.

Give me an example of a team using a 2-valve head. All the one's you listed used 4-valve heads. 5-valve trials have had some good effects in some reacing application and some street applications, but the staggered sizes, staggered flow and shear packaging difficulties don't drive all engineers to try them. Yamaha isn't quite a prime example of F1 technology's forefront.

Bottom-line to your example... none of those teams use a 2-valve head.

Originally Posted by todd
he is correct in regards to port and polish. Also, not need for the intake side of the head to have work either, only the exhaust side.
No, actually he isn't. I don't mean to be too abrupt, but the porting and polishing isn't of the combustion chamber, it's of the ports leading to it. You want laminar flow from the infinity, to the combustion chamber. Once it gets into the chamber, you want squish, tumble, and sheer turbulence for as pure a distribution as you can manage, and for flame-front expansion and propogation.
Old 02-15-2006 | 11:27 PM
  #71  
ehall's Avatar
ehall
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 2
From: long gone.....
Default

Originally Posted by lart951
Deitz, I was going to do it, but iam going to the dyno in a few minutes. Today is my b-day and I am installing some new gizmos in my car. Brb later for fun and to post dyno graph as well.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY you son of a bitch!
Old 02-16-2006 | 02:11 PM
  #72  
turbinek's Avatar
turbinek
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: Switzerland
Default

Originally Posted by FSAEracer03
Giving an example of a 2-valve, turbo car vs. a crotch rocket is like claiming you have a larger ***** because you wear italian leather shoes... that doesn't really mean anything in theory.

Give me an example of a team using a 2-valve head. All the one's you listed used 4-valve heads. 5-valve trials have had some good effects in some reacing application and some street applications, but the staggered sizes, staggered flow and shear packaging difficulties don't drive all engineers to try them. Yamaha isn't quite a prime example of F1 technology's forefront.

Bottom-line to your example... none of those teams use a 2-valve head.


No, actually he isn't. I don't mean to be too abrupt, but the porting and polishing isn't of the combustion chamber, it's of the ports leading to it. You want laminar flow from the infinity, to the combustion chamber. Once it gets into the chamber, you want squish, tumble, and sheer turbulence for as pure a distribution as you can manage, and for flame-front expansion and propogation.
I just wanted to give the idea how fast this 2valve single turbo can be.

With your answer you're a bit off topic?

You copied that with Yamaha - they announced we blow away everybody in F1 but they're gone without any good result.
Old 02-16-2006 | 05:52 PM
  #73  
FSAEracer03's Avatar
FSAEracer03
TRB0 GUY
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,769
Likes: 0
From: Daphne, AL
Default

Originally Posted by turbinek
I just wanted to give the idea how fast this 2valve single turbo can be.

With your answer you're a bit off topic?

You copied that with Yamaha - they announced we blow away everybody in F1 but they're gone without any good result.
Yeah, I think we're both a little off topic, no? I don't think we're hurting anyone though

I copied what with Yamaha? They can announce all they want to, but the fact stands that Ferrari spends more than 3 times what any other team put's into their cars. That's why they rent out a couple of their motors to the tune of $10million per season including accompanying Ferrari technicians. The fact stands that BMW has put more effort into their motors than any other single aspect of their car. Yamaha doesn't hold a candle to the billions those teams have invested into their cars.

"Speed costs money... how fast do you want to go?"
Old 02-16-2006 | 05:59 PM
  #74  
RajDatta's Avatar
RajDatta
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,732
Likes: 22
From: NJ
Default

I think the big dog in town in F1 will be Honda. They will be the team to look out for as far as sheer hp is concerned. Ofcourse it takes a complete package to win.
BTW, the Ferrari 355 did have 5 valves per cylinder, 3.5 with 5 valves. That is how they got their designation.
Raj
Old 02-16-2006 | 08:21 PM
  #75  
special tool's Avatar
special tool
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 1
From: limbo....
Default

Originally Posted by 968TurboS
I think the big dog in town in F1 will be Honda. They will be the team to look out for as far as sheer hp is concerned. Ofcourse it takes a complete package to win.
BTW, the Ferrari 355 did have 5 valves per cylinder, 3.5 with 5 valves. That is how they got their designation.
Raj

I agree - how many friggin times does Honda have to put its foot up the *** of the Gordon Murrays of the world to get some respect??????

Witness 1988 - Japanese boot directly up BMW's tailpipe - just like most krouts, they couldn't get the job done wiithout high boost.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:54 AM.