Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Ignition systems with standalone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-16-2005, 12:46 PM
  #16  
Fen
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Fen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wairarapa, NZ
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You can see the crank sensor set-up in this pic



and in this one you can just about see the cam sensor and the TPS mod

Old 09-16-2005, 02:22 PM
  #17  
Pauerman
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Pauerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 863
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey Fen, here's my crank trigger wheel and sensor - look familiar? Great minds buddy...

Old 09-16-2005, 03:56 PM
  #18  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

PS CDI creates a HUGE amount of interference, so makes sure your wiring layout is spaced well enough.
Old 09-16-2005, 05:40 PM
  #19  
DanG
Three Wheelin'
 
DanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Pauerman, how many teeth is that? It looks like it might be only ~24? What system are you running?

Dark, thedge, joseph imports, and I are all going to be testing out a "Divide by N" counter circuit, set to divide the 132 stock flywheel teeth by 3 to get 44 evenly spaced pulses per crank rotation. Then you feed the same chip the reference signal and it will "-1" for you. So for $5 per person (much cheaper if we ordered more than just the first 5 at a time, its only $1 in actual parts), we'll get a 44-1 signal from the stock sensors. In theory at least, it will take some additional work to implement.

More info here:

http://www.darklightning.com/motroni...opic.php?t=107

Check out the whole Motronic forum, lots of good technical info:

http://www.motroniccode.com/


About the coils, Pauerman was right on with the LS1 recommendation. If I don't go with COP units from the start, I'll probably use those. And if you're fouling plugs, either your ignition system isn't working properly, your fuel tuning is off, or you're ingesting a lot of oil. So unless your problem is the first of those, switching ignition systems isn't necessarily going to fix it.
Old 09-16-2005, 05:42 PM
  #20  
DanG
Three Wheelin'
 
DanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh yeah, here's the circuit for that "Divide by 3" idea DarkLightning came up with...
Old 09-16-2005, 05:54 PM
  #21  
Fen
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Fen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wairarapa, NZ
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hey Vic; pleased to see the same triggering setup used - useful M10 thread in the front of the block, isn't it?

DanG I suspect I get fouling (only after prolonged idling or running in traffic, not like it's horrific or anything) entirely because the ignition system is not working properly. By that I mean it is not a strong enough spark or I could benefit from changing the plug grade by 1. It's also possible the fuelling at low load/speed isn't perfect as we decided not to spend a lot of time on it when I'll be increasing the pressure ASAP anyway. I doubt it's oil as I'm not recirculating from the breather.
Old 09-16-2005, 06:40 PM
  #22  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Fen, RECIRCULATE from your breather (assuming you mean catch can)...
Old 09-16-2005, 06:51 PM
  #23  
Fen
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Fen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wairarapa, NZ
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I know many people say you should, but I'm not seeing any problems (I drilled out the restrictor). What problems is it supposed to cause?
Old 09-16-2005, 07:17 PM
  #24  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Several problems, most of which you probably have already heard, oil fumes in the cabin, no vacuum on the crankcase... There are only negatives to the ATM vented design, and only positives to the recirculating. You still "catch" the oil in a recirculating design... but dont ave the other issues.
Old 09-16-2005, 09:01 PM
  #25  
Pauerman
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Pauerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 863
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanG
Pauerman, how many teeth is that? It looks like it might be only ~24? What system are you running?
It is a 24 tooth setup - I chose the tooth count based on the AEM box I'm using. I could have used practically any tooth count I wanted, but since I'm going into "uncharted waters" with an AEM EMS, I wanted to stick with a number that the box readily recognized.


Originally Posted by DanG
About the coils, Pauerman was right on with the LS1 recommendation. If I don't go with COP units from the start, I'll probably use those. And if you're fouling plugs, either your ignition system isn't working properly, your fuel tuning is off, or you're ingesting a lot of oil. So unless your problem is the first of those, switching ignition systems isn't necessarily going to fix it.
If any of you guys are interested, I've got an extra set of 4 LS1 coils with the harness.

Vic
Old 09-17-2005, 01:13 AM
  #26  
DanG
Three Wheelin'
 
DanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How much?

BTW, I got my chips for that divider circuit up above from John G today. Hopefully I'll be able to test them out very soon. Keep your fingers crossed!
Old 09-17-2005, 05:58 AM
  #27  
Fen
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Fen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wairarapa, NZ
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The divider sounds interesting, though I am more than happy with my triggering now we have built it. Like Vic I used what the Autronic wanted and the easiest of those options (it was also happy with 2 missing tooth options).

I think I'll bear the LS1 coils in mind but I suspect it is very similar to the Nissan SR20DET setup NZ suggested and that would be much easier to get my hands on in the UK. I'd like to investigate CoP first anyway, especially the Peugeot set I have in my garage.

Andrew - I don't get fumes in the cabin. What am I losing by not having vacuum in the crank case? I understood it was just to get the oil vapour out but it's doing that anyway as I have a very small amount of oil in the catch tank.
Old 09-17-2005, 11:26 AM
  #28  
DanG
Three Wheelin'
 
DanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Fen it draws the fuel vapor from blowby out of your oil as well, it also helps prevent oil leaks, including pulling oil through the turbo's compressor shaft seal.
Old 09-17-2005, 12:03 PM
  #29  
theedge
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
theedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, Eh?
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Vacuum on the crankcase helps the piston rings seal better.
Old 09-17-2005, 08:47 PM
  #30  
Fen
Racer
Thread Starter
 
Fen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Wairarapa, NZ
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Does it really though? I mean when would it help, during the induction stroke? On a forced induction engine that doesn't sound all that important. As soon as the compression stroke starts the pressure in the cylinder above the rings rises so much that I can't see a few pounds of vacuum below the rings making any significant difference and once the plug fires there is no way that the change in differential across the rings between an atmospheric and vacuumed crankcase can be significant. If anything I'd have thought vacuum below the rings would encourage blow-by.

All of that is just me thinking about it out loud, not based on experience or even anything I've read so I'm happy to be proved wrong.

In terms of removing fuel vapour I can see that, but won't vapour by its nature make its way out the breather anyway? I can see helping the oil through the turbo but then I've heard of excess oil usage with the same turbo I have on a car with stock breather and I'm not seeing that. Lastly I guess it would help with leaks but really it's a bandaid at best if you have that problem.

I guess I'm still not persuaded to route it back to the intake yet.


Quick Reply: Ignition systems with standalone



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:07 PM.