Did I brake my MAF?
#1
Pro
Thread Starter
![Question](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon5.gif)
Yesterday, while driving through heavy rain and with my lights popped up, I noticed that the signal comming from the MAF goes birzerk from 3.9 volts. Up to 3.9 volts everything is ok, but then it jumpes to 5 volts and it stays there.
The highest voltage I normally get is 4.3 volts.
Did I brake something?
Thanks!
The highest voltage I normally get is 4.3 volts.
Did I brake something?
Thanks!
Last edited by Frank@Work; 11-14-2005 at 04:00 AM.
#2
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yesterday I had the problem decribed above. This morning I had the same problem. This afternoon everything was like it should be!
I haven't got a clue what went wrong (and went right).
I will post some Zeitronix screen shots later.
I haven't got a clue what went wrong (and went right).
I will post some Zeitronix screen shots later.
#5
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by RKD in OKC
You think maybe the rain got your air filter wet and it cooled off the hot wire in the MAF? Later the air filter dried out...
Is this possible?
Trending Topics
#8
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Today I definately concluded that a wet air filter will mess up the MAF signal! I went datalogging just after washing the car. During the washing I had the lights popped up to clean the lenses.
After the washing I went for a ride to get some more data and the car was running not as usual and leaner than before (± 13:0). The lights where closed. The MAF signal was erratic.
The only conclusion I can make is that the filter was wet and messed up the MAF signal. It might be a good idea to put some kind of deflector in front of the filter.
After the washing I went for a ride to get some more data and the car was running not as usual and leaner than before (± 13:0). The lights where closed. The MAF signal was erratic.
The only conclusion I can make is that the filter was wet and messed up the MAF signal. It might be a good idea to put some kind of deflector in front of the filter.
#10
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting.
Frank - if you have a piggyback, you should log the MAF signal both before AND after modification (by piggyback). You can use the the "user input" channel on your Zeitronix and simply multiply by 20 to equal the "MAF" trace.
Now - LOG THE egt (VERY IMPORTANT) and note what is happening.
Please post the results of this test, if you have the time.
Frank - if you have a piggyback, you should log the MAF signal both before AND after modification (by piggyback). You can use the the "user input" channel on your Zeitronix and simply multiply by 20 to equal the "MAF" trace.
Now - LOG THE egt (VERY IMPORTANT) and note what is happening.
Please post the results of this test, if you have the time.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#11
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The measurement from today I did not save, but I do have the logs from the time that the filter got wet from the rain (see pictures above).
I can supply you a file with the MAF signal before and after modification, but I do not have a EGT sensor (yet).
Sorry.
I can supply you a file with the MAF signal before and after modification, but I do not have a EGT sensor (yet).
Sorry.