Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Intake design part 1: Pressure resonance in the plenum with forced induction???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2005, 02:00 AM
  #16  
NZ951
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thats mate! Looking good...

Ok, now back to intake pressure waves / ST's johnson.
Old 07-10-2005, 02:48 AM
  #17  
DanG
Three Wheelin'
 
DanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll chime in, for once I actually know something about a topic. Believe it or not, I work on this stuff all day. Engine induction systems product development engineer.

The shape/angle of the wall opposite the runner opening are not whats critical for these pressure waves. The critical dimension for runner tuning is length, and this length is simply from the intake valve to the opening at the plenum. The opposite wall on the plenum has no real effects here, although its certainly still important, mainly its contribution to consistent flow through each runner on an asymmetric manifold.

I could try to explain the whole wave phenomenon it a little more detail, but howstuffworks probably does it better...

http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question517.htm

However, on a turbo car, our efforts are better spent elsewhere. Decreasing restriction/increasing flow and dropping charged air temps is the thing to work on.
Old 07-10-2005, 02:53 AM
  #18  
NZ951
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Cool, so I can make my triangular plenum and keep the orientation of the IC / IC pipes! yay.
Old 07-10-2005, 02:57 AM
  #19  
J Chen
Drifting
 
J Chen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whatever you do NZ, try to maximise runner lenght.
That way you wound'nt kill the torque.
Old 07-10-2005, 03:02 AM
  #20  
NZ951
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I am trying to "tune" the runner lengths, not just make the as long as possible. It will either be 9 inches or 11 inches, hopefully 11 as that means 4 reflective waves. If I can fit 10 inches, I will be making it 9 for example. Unless I change the tune target!
Old 07-10-2005, 03:11 AM
  #21  
DanG
Three Wheelin'
 
DanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The engineer in me wants to say you should at least try to run some tests on a flowbench if you're going to start buildin your own manifold. If things conspire against you, you could see 5-10% differences between runners, most likely makeing some run too rich, while others run too lean. (Unless you've got four WBO2s and stand-alone EMS with individual cylinder control).

Here's some links to get you started...

http://www.speakeasy.org/~synchris/e...flowbench.html
http://tractorsport.com/flowbenchparts.htm

I'm lucky, I've got a few flowbenches at work that I can use whenever. I just don't have the desire to uild my own manifold just yet. Maybe once I start running out of things to tweak on my new car.
Old 07-10-2005, 03:14 AM
  #22  
J Chen
Drifting
 
J Chen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is there space for 11 inch runners. A friend of mine did
some calculation sometime back & it seems that the ideal
would be 15-16 inches measured from the valve seat but
where to find the space.
Old 07-10-2005, 03:20 AM
  #23  
NZ951
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Funny you should say, it will be flow tested by runner, unlike some, and it will be used in conjunction with individual WBO2 and EGT

Are you sure there is 11 inches space there including the required distance from the velocity stack to the pelnum face? I am thinking AOS would be in the way...

Dan, velocity stacks in a turbo application or not?
Old 07-10-2005, 03:34 AM
  #24  
J Chen
Drifting
 
J Chen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey NZ,
Re-read my post.
Old 07-10-2005, 03:41 AM
  #25  
NZ951
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yeah I got it, I meant 11, You need 11 plus twice the diameter of the runner (2 inches for me), in distance from the end of the stack to the plenum...
Old 07-10-2005, 08:36 AM
  #26  
special tool
Banned
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well, you are limted to 4 EGT's NZ because wideband o2 will give you nothing good being placed between head and turbocharger.
Old 07-10-2005, 12:48 PM
  #27  
fortysixandtwo
Three Wheelin'
 
fortysixandtwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: formerly RI, then MO, now CA
Posts: 1,649
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Why would getting 11" of runner be difficult? The factory ones are about 15".
Old 07-10-2005, 01:25 PM
  #28  
DanG
Three Wheelin'
 
DanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NZ951
Dan, velocity stacks in a turbo application or not?
DEFINITELY. If you're going through the efforts of building your own manifold, this part is a no brainer. It should also help you with packaging, since your runner lengths extend into the plenum a bit.

This is a pretty good discussion about it, except his design for the "180 deg." bellmouth is flawed, the bell radius should be about half the tube radius, his looks to be closer to 1/4 or so. If he bumped that bell radius up to around 1/2 tube radius, the CFD results should show it flows the best.

http://www.gt40s.com/ubbthreads/show...p?Number=29735
Old 07-10-2005, 04:35 PM
  #29  
NZ951
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fortysixandtwo
Why would getting 11" of runner be difficult? The factory ones are about 15".
I already posted this earlier in the thread, but its because of velocity stacks and the requirement to have twice the diameter of the tube in distance from the end of the stack and the plenum, also, the stock runners have a lot of form cast in them, I wont be casting the intake, it will be a one bend runner hopefully.
Old 07-10-2005, 04:37 PM
  #30  
NZ951
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanG
DEFINITELY. If you're going through the efforts of building your own manifold, this part is a no brainer. It should also help you with packaging, since your runner lengths extend into the plenum a bit.

This is a pretty good discussion about it, except his design for the "180 deg." bellmouth is flawed, the bell radius should be about half the tube radius, his looks to be closer to 1/4 or so. If he bumped that bell radius up to around 1/2 tube radius, the CFD results should show it flows the best.

http://www.gt40s.com/ubbthreads/show...p?Number=29735
The runner dia will be 2 inch looking at my calculations. I think Corky Bell suggests a whole diameter radius in the stack... hmmm maybe I read it wrong.


Quick Reply: Intake design part 1: Pressure resonance in the plenum with forced induction???



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:32 PM.