Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Drill the AOS if no catch can?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2005, 04:12 PM
  #16  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

What would be the point of have a filtered open recirculating can. LMAO
Old 07-07-2007, 03:39 AM
  #17  
M Danger
Three Wheelin'
 
M Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Centennial Colorado
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

He Special, any thoughts on how this might relate for me since im getting smoke on decel only?
Both head and turbo with about 5k on them from Powehaus, the PO was running about 20lbs of boost
Old 07-07-2007, 04:45 AM
  #18  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by special tool
Wes - I am talking about a CLOSED tank, not an open, filtered tank. Obviously, this retains the vacuum.
Hey Special Tool,

Is there a particular one you can suggest that works well... or am i better off modiying the LR one (since I already have it). If using the LR one, I guess I'd just fit a pipe to the top in place of the filter. If so, what diameter would you suggest. My AOS has not een drilled but has been enlarged with a soldering iron.

Thanks
Old 07-07-2007, 05:49 AM
  #19  
eniac
Drifting
 
eniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since I removed everything in front of my turbo except a filter, there is no way for me to route an AOS line back into the intake. Instead I installed a generic breather filter on a small hose coming off the top of the AOS. After 2 months of testing this method out I have seen MUCH less oil in my intercooler pipes and less smoke out the tail pipe. I typically run 23psi for normal street driving and 27psi when I feel like going fast . I don't really see the need for a catch can unless your pulling with vacuum back into the intake.
Old 07-07-2007, 06:46 AM
  #20  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just put my setup back together. I've been playing with this problem for a couple of days now, experimenting in every way. I have to side with Tool. (Why wouldn't I, I'm sure he's already done all this)
But.. I didn't see anyone mention that little aluminum reducer in the vacuum line. what's that about?
Old 07-07-2007, 07:02 AM
  #21  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eniac
I typically run 23psi for normal street driving and 27psi when I feel like going fast . I don't really see the need for a catch can unless your pulling with vacuum back into the intake.
What turbo, and on what fuel?



Rogue
Old 07-07-2007, 07:28 AM
  #22  
special tool
Banned
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by M Danger
He Special, any thoughts on how this might relate for me since im getting smoke on decel only?
Both head and turbo with about 5k on them from Powehaus, the PO was running about 20lbs of boost
uh-oh - this is not really a symptom of the case.
What color is the smoke?
Old 07-07-2007, 01:28 PM
  #23  
eniac
Drifting
 
eniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
What turbo, and on what fuel?



Rogue

60-1 turbo and C16
Old 07-07-2007, 02:56 PM
  #24  
M Danger
Three Wheelin'
 
M Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Centennial Colorado
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by special tool
uh-oh - this is not really a symptom of the case.
What color is the smoke?
its blue-grey. Was thinking maybe a valve seal popped off, then came across this thread...
Old 07-07-2007, 03:02 PM
  #25  
LFA951
Drifting
 
LFA951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SFL
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eniac
Since I removed everything in front of my turbo except a filter, there is no way for me to route an AOS line back into the intake. Instead I installed a generic breather filter on a small hose coming off the top of the AOS. After 2 months of testing this method out I have seen MUCH less oil in my intercooler pipes and less smoke out the tail pipe. I typically run 23psi for normal street driving and 27psi when I feel like going fast . I don't really see the need for a catch can unless your pulling with vacuum back into the intake.
I have the same setup, drilled the hole bigger, bought a curved 3/4" hose designed to curve at the port and come straight up behind the intake manifold and put a 2" generic breather on top, only drawback is that it spits out a little oil under heavy acceleration around the oil filler cap where it's near, but other than that, my plugs don't get bathed in oil anymore, and my pipes and intake throttle body have also much less oil in them, and I'm not blowing out as much smoke through the exhaust, since there is oil oil going into the coldside impellers...
Old 07-09-2007, 01:46 AM
  #26  
M Danger
Three Wheelin'
 
M Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Centennial Colorado
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hey Special any thoughts?
Old 03-24-2008, 07:49 PM
  #27  
M Danger
Three Wheelin'
 
M Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Centennial Colorado
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

bump
Old 03-25-2008, 01:07 AM
  #28  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

eniac and LFA951;
I'm doing the same thing.
However the the odd, odd time, I do have oil smoke coming from my exhaust. It's very seldom; notice it only at idle, maybe, after some spirited throttle or after restarting the car. I know why it's doing it (possible lack of turbo drain capability), so I'm not alarmed and just ignore it.

Having said that; as for Porsche's stock setup, I would question if it's purpose is to drain the turbo. I think it's for emissions reasons to recirculate the crankcase vapours. Besides, by routing it upstream of the turbo compressor, how much vacuum is being generated, really. Nowadays, with our free flowing air filters and MAFs, air is taking the path of least resistance and there's very little "pulling" from the crankcase. Also, even if there was a vacuum being generated, wouldn't it only be when the turbo is really spinning? All the other times, when the turbo isn't producing any boost, I cant see there being any vacuum in front of the turbo. During these times the engine is still running and there's a certain amount of blowby that would need to be vented. So what about that?
Also, if there actually is vacuum between the air filter/air flow measuring device and the turbo, you could argue that it's comprimising power output because the turbo is seeing less than ambient pressure.

Getting back to my case; I have a bigger engine and running more boost. So, perhaps the stock venting size is not big enough. I have since rectified this and we will see if I still get a smoking turbo the odd time.

I would state that air always goes from a high pressure zone to low pressure. So, if you have crankcase pressure it should still vent to atmosphere, because ambient is still lower pressure than the crankcase. Providing, of course, there is enough "room" for this pressure differential to flow, I wouldn't think you actually need a "vacuum".

I'm eagerly awaiting a rebuttal to tell me if I'm seeing this wrong.
Old 03-25-2008, 02:09 AM
  #29  
zoltan944
Three Wheelin'
 
zoltan944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego / Las Vegas
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the crankcase wants to vent most under pressure. under high throttle you have no vaccuum in fact you have boost only. It is vented to the intake manifold for emissions and a zero maintenance system. under a stock system you are only venting off throttle at vaccuum pull.
A vented catchcan is the best solution. Great way to stop oil from coating our motor.
Old 03-25-2008, 09:57 AM
  #30  
eniac
Drifting
 
eniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTommy
eniac and LFA951;

I would state that air always goes from a high pressure zone to low pressure. So, if you have crankcase pressure it should still vent to atmosphere, because ambient is still lower pressure than the crankcase. Providing, of course, there is enough "room" for this pressure differential to flow, I wouldn't think you actually need a "vacuum".
This is pretty much how I see it. If equalizing with atmosphere pressure is too much for your crankcase and you need vacuum to prevent blow-by then you have much larger issues that will need to be dealt with.


Quick Reply: Drill the AOS if no catch can?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:27 AM.