Piggy back and wb02
#1
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hello all
I am interested in installing a fuel piggyback and a wb02 sensor. Any recommendations?
If someone is interested in sellling theirs I would be happy to consider it
Thanks
I am interested in installing a fuel piggyback and a wb02 sensor. Any recommendations?
If someone is interested in sellling theirs I would be happy to consider it
Thanks
#4
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i went tech edge http://www.wbo2.com/ an eprom burner instead of a piggyback http://xtronics.com/memory/EPROM.htm.
A bit cheaper and you end up with less electronics in the car.
A bit cheaper and you end up with less electronics in the car.
#6
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hally, that is assuming that someone knows how to and what code to change on the eprom.
http://www.mskar.org/dme_download.html
Just like you would with a piggyback, start with small changes.
Trending Topics
#8
#10
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Beab951, did you mean 27C64, or are the 2764 eproms equiviliant, anyway the ones i used were 27C64G and came from JDR (28pin). They had a programming voltage of 21v and struggled to get them to program after about half a dozen erases so there are probably better choices, still with 3 of them that was plenty of iterations and i got the job done fine. At the end of the day go with Beabs advice, he knows electronics and helped me out researching the 27C64G at the time.
#11
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 27C64 is a CMOS version of the 2764 memory IC. Both the 2764 and the 27C64 will work. The 27C64 has the advantage of using less power and has a lower programming voltage (12.5VDC). The link to futurlec has both of them in stock. Given a choice, I would pick the 27C64.
#12
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Rephrasing my old question, do you recommend the faster chips vs. the 'slower' chips? In the case of the 27C64 we're talking 120ns vs 150ns vs 200ns, all of which are damn fast and probably more than the DME requires.
Edit: And what about EEPROM options?
Edit: And what about EEPROM options?
Last edited by Dark Lightning; 05-31-2005 at 11:43 AM.
#13
Drifting
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The old country
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Way to hijack a thread guys!
@ cgmonster, I went for the LR mafterburner and uego WBO2 and I'm happy, except for the one drawback that I can't datalog boost too. It'd be nice to be able to show that against the other features the Mafterburner has to offer, but it doesn't make it any harder to tune.
@ cgmonster, I went for the LR mafterburner and uego WBO2 and I'm happy, except for the one drawback that I can't datalog boost too. It'd be nice to be able to show that against the other features the Mafterburner has to offer, but it doesn't make it any harder to tune.