Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

New Vitesse "sledgehammer" head - pics inside...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-26-2005, 04:02 PM
  #16  
Dark Lightning
Pro
 
Dark Lightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Does Vitesse announce anything on their own these days or is the Tool their elected voicebox?
Old 04-26-2005, 04:06 PM
  #17  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Just posting to subscribe
Old 04-26-2005, 04:08 PM
  #18  
David Floyd
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
David Floyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,109
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dark Lightning
Does Vitesse announce anything on their own these days or is the Tool their elected voicebox?
He is "Special" ya know
Old 04-26-2005, 04:09 PM
  #19  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Like Special Ed special? I hear ya! :P
Old 04-26-2005, 04:10 PM
  #20  
streckfu's
Rennlist Member
 
streckfu's's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 77,321
Received 668 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Floyd
He is "Special" ya know

I thought he was just a "tool"
Old 04-26-2005, 04:14 PM
  #21  
David Floyd
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
David Floyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 7,109
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

You can bet, once John has the head like he wants, he will let us know.

Old 04-26-2005, 04:16 PM
  #22  
special tool
Banned
Thread Starter
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Jeff - 16valve is a lot more work.
The "sledgehammer" ( ) is bolt-on.

I will have strictly ("sledgehammer" TM) comparison on the mustang dyno within a couple weeks. Nothing else will have been changed.

I am using a long duration, stock lift cam right now.

For those interested - I believe John is currently designing the "Sasquatch" TM head right now - NA core and race only.
Old 04-26-2005, 05:20 PM
  #23  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Once I get a minute to update the site (any surprises here? LOL) I will post more details and pictures.

For the 951 we will be offering the followings: (you can change the name to whatever you like ).
- Stage 1 head: refresh, custom seats, stock valve size
- Stage 2 head: Same as stage 1 but with larger intake valves etc..
- Stage 3 head: Different intake, exhaust, keepers,... and larger intake ports as well (SpecialTool special). This requires intake manifold mods as well.
- Stage 4 head: I'm having this done for my race car.. Larger intake, exhaust valves.. many other mods and will be $$$

Notes:
* The intake & exh. valves used on the head (in the pictures here) are totally custom. You will be surprised at the weight in comparison to the stock items.
* A custom cam with the correct lift, duration and overlap will be needed to get the most out of the big-valve head. However there will be gain with the stock cam
* In general, I prefer to have customers do the performance reporting (good or bad!!!).
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 04-26-2005, 05:49 PM
  #24  
Porsche-O-Phile
Banned
 
Porsche-O-Phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In self-imposed exile.
Posts: 14,072
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Looks VERY interesting. I'm not knocking it at all - it looks beautiful. I'm just wondering whether it'd be worthwhile to go 16v or just with something like this. No doubt 16v is a lot more work since you have to redo the entire front of the engine, but there's the issue of cost - a 16v head in good condition can be had for about 500 bucks. This bad boy is going to be (I'm guessing) at least a grand and a half. . .

The flow rates on the sledgehammer might actually be better than with a stock 16v though. . . It's got definite possibilities.
Old 04-26-2005, 05:54 PM
  #25  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

The 16-V head will flow better than any 8V head, and is much more timing friendly. However, a used 16V head in fair condition is about $1000 then you have to replace the valves add about $1-1.5K, rework the head etc , exhaust manifold, intake manifold and you will be looking at an easy $3.5-5K.
If money is no object, then 16V might perform better, however it might require more maintenance as well...

Last edited by fast951; 04-26-2005 at 06:46 PM.
Old 04-26-2005, 06:18 PM
  #26  
Dark Lightning
Pro
 
Dark Lightning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm with Vitesse. 16V will dominate but on a dollar-per-horsepower chart an oversized 8V will be superior.

My only concern over an extremely oversized 8V head (or 16V for that matter) is this: if the valves are too close to the edge of the combustion chamber & cylinder wall you'll actually start to see a drop in airflow potential.
Old 04-26-2005, 06:45 PM
  #27  
MitchB
Burning Brakes
 
MitchB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas, then Annapolis - now Laguna Beach CA. Well, not so fast - I'm back in Dallas. For good!
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

However much HP it makes, I don't believe you... lol
Had to do it.

I kill myself sometimes...
Old 04-26-2005, 06:45 PM
  #28  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dark Lightning
My only concern over an extremely oversized 8V head (or 16V for that matter) is this: if the valves are too close to the edge of the combustion chamber & cylinder wall you'll actually start to see a drop in airflow potential.
Agree 100%. Bigger valves up to a pointe you will see increase in flow. Go any larger on the valves, and no gain. Of course there are ways to get around this issue (to some degree) by reworking the combustion chamber walls.

Of course, valve size is just 1 factor, there are lots of tricks that can take place. Then again it's all $$$. Once you go over a certain level, the gain per $ goes down fast. You got to find a sweet spot and call it the day.
Old 04-26-2005, 06:51 PM
  #29  
MitchB
Burning Brakes
 
MitchB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas, then Annapolis - now Laguna Beach CA. Well, not so fast - I'm back in Dallas. For good!
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not an expert, but has there been a little metal removed near the valves? Does that create increased "squish area" volume with a subsequent change in comp ratio?
Old 04-26-2005, 06:58 PM
  #30  
Jakerx
Hitsquad Ninja
Rennlist Member
 
Jakerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,406
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

are those intake valves bigger than 2.7 valves?


Quick Reply: New Vitesse "sledgehammer" head - pics inside...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:58 PM.