Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Turbo choices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2005, 06:03 AM
  #46  
hosrom_951
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
 
hosrom_951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UAE & Germany
Posts: 9,142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Watch the speedo when boost "hits" at 6k+rpms
Old 03-02-2005, 06:57 AM
  #47  
hally
Rennlist Member
 
hally's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So has anyone got a dyno chart of a Turbonetics T04E w/ 50 trim compressor wheel and #8 hotside.
Old 03-02-2005, 11:50 AM
  #48  
J Chen
Drifting
 
J Chen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hally,
PM Rage, he use to run one & I remembered that he
made very good power from it. BTW, this is really
a very safe buy. Among the 4E's the 50 trim has the
best overall flow much better then the 46 or 57 trim.
A friend of mine is using one but with Super 50 trim.
Very very good.
Old 03-02-2005, 02:23 PM
  #49  
rage2
Three Wheelin'
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pauerman
I mentioned the TPS switch cause I thought Rage was using a TO4S on his 2.8L setup and I think he mentioned that he had to use a different TPS switch.
Pauerman is correct. It was a clearance issue. Using a E36 M3 TPS now.
Old 03-02-2005, 02:25 PM
  #50  
rage2
Three Wheelin'
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J Chen
hally,
PM Rage, he use to run one & I remembered that he
made very good power from it. BTW, this is really
a very safe buy. Among the 4E's the 50 trim has the
best overall flow much better then the 46 or 57 trim.
A friend of mine is using one but with Super 50 trim.
Very very good.
I ran a 57 trim on the 951. The 50 trim is a way better compressor (from the maps anyways). Not much loss in peak flow, but way better everywhere else, similar to the "Super" series.

I do have a 50 trim turbocharger in my garage, but it's going into my Civic racecar.
Old 03-02-2005, 02:58 PM
  #51  
Pauerman
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Pauerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 863
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rage2
Pauerman is correct. It was a clearance issue. Using a E36 M3 TPS now.
I thought so Rage.

The super 50 moves you away from the surge limit but also shifts the high RPM points to lower islands of efficiency.

I've been looking at the 46 trim and 60 trim and found that the lower RPM points were on or passed over the surge limit. I used these values to calculate flow: 3000RPM, 85%Ve, 2.5L

Pr 2.0 = 15.84 lbs/min
Pr 2.2 = 17.42 lbs/min

Does anyone else see this? Are my numbers off? With all the guys that run the 46 and 60 trim, never hear much about compressor surge.

I thought the 2V head flowed more efficiently at lower RPM's which is why they produce more torque down low compared to 16V heads. Chen doesn't seem to thinks so.
Old 03-02-2005, 04:44 PM
  #52  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Could you plot this map for me Pauerman. I would like to see how efficient this wheel is. Thanks
Attached Images  

Last edited by jimbo1111; 03-02-2005 at 05:13 PM.
Old 03-02-2005, 05:15 PM
  #53  
Tomas L
Pro
 
Tomas L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Boden, Sweden
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's how I've mapped the load points of the 951. These points are calculated with a Ve 85% and RPM 6500 and 2.5L displacement of course.
Why do you use 6500 rpm? The airflow will be highest close to the max power rpm and that should be somewhere around 5500-6000 rpm for an unmodified 951 engine. Above that rpm VE decreses faster than rpm increases thus air flow will decrease.
85% VE may be correct at 5500 rpm but hardly at 6500 rpm. Does anyone have data on this?
Old 03-02-2005, 05:21 PM
  #54  
rage2
Three Wheelin'
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tomas L
Why do you use 6500 rpm? The airflow will be highest close to the max power rpm and that should be somewhere around 5500-6000 rpm for an unmodified 951 engine. Above that rpm VE decreses faster than rpm increases thus air flow will decrease.
85% VE may be correct at 5500 rpm but hardly at 6500 rpm. Does anyone have data on this?
If the timing is setup properly, peak power comes up later. I made my peak HP at 6600rpm or something on my 2.5L.
Old 03-02-2005, 07:05 PM
  #55  
Dave E
Pro
 
Dave E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is compressor surge and what are the effects of it?
Old 03-02-2005, 11:34 PM
  #56  
Pauerman
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Pauerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun
Posts: 863
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jimbo, T-61 right?

I'll keep the high RPM points at 6500 (thanks for your input Rage) and Ve @ 85%. Low RPM points will be 3000 and same Ve. All lbs/min values have previously listed.

Here you go.

Old 03-02-2005, 11:38 PM
  #57  
RogueM3
Pro
 
RogueM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pauerman
Jimbo, T-61 right?

I'll keep the high RPM points at 6500 (thanks for your input Rage) and Ve @ 85%. Low RPM points will be 3000 and same Ve. All lbs/min values have previously listed.

Here you go.

Wow..thats very efficient.
Old 03-02-2005, 11:44 PM
  #58  
hosrom_951
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
 
hosrom_951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UAE & Germany
Posts: 9,142
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RogueM3
Wow..thats very efficient.
You don't see the first two plots OUTSIDE the surge?
Old 03-03-2005, 01:18 AM
  #59  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Rage, do you have a timing map handy that you run based on MAP?
Old 03-03-2005, 01:37 AM
  #60  
J Chen
Drifting
 
J Chen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jimbo,
That turbo is too big. You won't see any meaningful
power till at past 4500 rpm, It's o.k if you are planning
on running at 6500rpm all day long.


Quick Reply: Turbo choices



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:25 PM.