Supercharger vs. Turbo
#1
Pro
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Supercharger vs. Turbo
For the first time in several years I read a Hot Rod magazine the other day. I always thought of a supercharger as the big rectangle thing that sits on top of a dragster engine. Now, many of the supercharged hot rods use what looks like a belt-driven turbo charger like this one.
http://www.superchargersonline.com/p...r=RK-010910284
To a non-engineer like myself this looks like a far better turbo strategy as opposed to an exhaust driven turbo like ours. The reason I think this is because of less plumbing, lower under-hood temps, fewer parts to break, same pressure generation strategy (a standard turbo compressor wheel), and I would think the spool up time would be quicker.
Is my logic right? If so, has anyone thought of going this route on a 951?
http://www.superchargersonline.com/p...r=RK-010910284
To a non-engineer like myself this looks like a far better turbo strategy as opposed to an exhaust driven turbo like ours. The reason I think this is because of less plumbing, lower under-hood temps, fewer parts to break, same pressure generation strategy (a standard turbo compressor wheel), and I would think the spool up time would be quicker.
Is my logic right? If so, has anyone thought of going this route on a 951?
#2
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The downside is that you are not recovering any waste heat (energy) from the exhaust. Also the centrifugal superchargers (turbo style) are not as efficient at the low RPMs that belt driving them gets you. The
Here is a quick article you might find interesting:
http://www.superchargersonline.com/content.asp?ID=19
-Joel.
Here is a quick article you might find interesting:
http://www.superchargersonline.com/content.asp?ID=19
-Joel.
#3
Three Wheelin'
By defination a turbocharger uses exhaust gas to turn the compressor, while a supercharger uses a mechaincal power take off, ie a belt and pulley.
With that said, there are two types of superchargers, namely Roots type blowers like those on a blown Hemi in a top fuel dragster, and centrifigual (sp?) blowers like the one in your link.
As for which is better, that argument has raged, and will rage on for years. However, you are correct about spool up or turbo lag simply because a supercharger is mechanically coupled to the engine, while a turbocharter is fluid coupled.
Under hood temps may be a different matter. Two similar engines, one supercharted and one turbo charged, should (One would think) generate the same amount of thermal energy (heat) for a given horsepower output. The only thing I can see that might make a turbo hotter would be radiation from the crossover plumbing.
As for converting a 951 over to a supercharger, I'm sure it could be done, but would the conversion be worth the cost? I'd wager you could rebuild a 951 power plant (rings, bearings, seals, etc), and upgrade the turbo, exhaust, fuel delivery, and engine management systems for a lot less and come away with a more powerful and more reliable car in the process.
With that said, there are two types of superchargers, namely Roots type blowers like those on a blown Hemi in a top fuel dragster, and centrifigual (sp?) blowers like the one in your link.
As for which is better, that argument has raged, and will rage on for years. However, you are correct about spool up or turbo lag simply because a supercharger is mechanically coupled to the engine, while a turbocharter is fluid coupled.
Under hood temps may be a different matter. Two similar engines, one supercharted and one turbo charged, should (One would think) generate the same amount of thermal energy (heat) for a given horsepower output. The only thing I can see that might make a turbo hotter would be radiation from the crossover plumbing.
As for converting a 951 over to a supercharger, I'm sure it could be done, but would the conversion be worth the cost? I'd wager you could rebuild a 951 power plant (rings, bearings, seals, etc), and upgrade the turbo, exhaust, fuel delivery, and engine management systems for a lot less and come away with a more powerful and more reliable car in the process.
#6
Originally Posted by J Chen
Not if it's the Rotrex centrifugal supercharger.
Very compact in dimension. About the size of
an alternator & very efficient.
Very compact in dimension. About the size of
an alternator & very efficient.
IN terms of FI I think almost everyone realizes the Turbo is the father of them all....just overall the best.
The best type of supercharger is a positive displacement because of its power right at idle...no lag as found in a centrifugal (run off of the crank...so the crank needs to spin into higher rpms in order to spool up the supercharger)
#7
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Ski
Superchargers even though they gain you hp you're still pulling hp off of it to run it. Turbocharging is free in the view of what's running it.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by sweanders
This has been covered many times and the conclusion is that you need to run higher boost on a supercharged engine to achieve the power of a turbocharged engine.
#13
UAE Rennlist Ambassador
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Back-pressure is one of the many say...."disadvantages" of turbochargers so to speak
In terms of source or energy, the turbocharger is free (exhaust as we all know) but the super charger is belt drivenm thus needs energy (hp) to produce hp.
Which we know of this
Generally speaking!!!!!
In terms of source or energy, the turbocharger is free (exhaust as we all know) but the super charger is belt drivenm thus needs energy (hp) to produce hp.
Which we know of this
Generally speaking!!!!!
#15
RougeM3,
I would advice you to research more about the Rotrex
supercharger. It's unlike any other centri-chargers
out there & it does not only run at low boost as you
suggested & they can be upgraded as well.
I would advice you to research more about the Rotrex
supercharger. It's unlike any other centri-chargers
out there & it does not only run at low boost as you
suggested & they can be upgraded as well.