TurboS Dyno results
07-29-2004, 05:49 PM
#31
Drifting
Originally Posted by racebryce
which is corect. 1988 944 turbo or 1989 944 turbo "s". It states at begining of post that car is 1988 turbo "s" and se all know by now that a factory turbo "s" only in u.s. in 1989 only painted rose metalic unless speical orderd.
07-29-2004, 06:18 PM
#32
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Guys,
As I said in the first post, it's an 1988 TurboS (Silverrose).
HP/TQ is at the hubs (despite what the chart says, since no correction factor was used)
I'm not sure why the HP/TQ doesn't cross at 5252rpm - I'm going to ask the dyno guys
I'm also not sure why the torque dropoff on the chart was so huge. Boost stayed pretty constant at 1.85 bar all the way to 6000rpm. Car pulls hard, especially at higher rpms.
As I said in the first post, it's an 1988 TurboS (Silverrose).
HP/TQ is at the hubs (despite what the chart says, since no correction factor was used)
I'm not sure why the HP/TQ doesn't cross at 5252rpm - I'm going to ask the dyno guys
I'm also not sure why the torque dropoff on the chart was so huge. Boost stayed pretty constant at 1.85 bar all the way to 6000rpm. Car pulls hard, especially at higher rpms.
07-29-2004, 06:38 PM
#33
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cherry Hill,N.J
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sami951
Thomas, take a close look at your graphs; on the first one, where the hp/tq lines don't cross at 5252 rpm, the scale is different - on y-axis the values for hp range from 0 to 350, and for tq they're between 0 and 400... on the later charts, the scale is the same, from 0 to 400 on both... and they cross right where they should. Tune has nothing to do with it, honest!
07-29-2004, 07:57 PM
#34
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by Konstantin
the dyno on the top say flywheelHP
so this is not wheel HP but about 15% more
Konstantin
so this is not wheel HP but about 15% more
Konstantin
07-29-2004, 08:39 PM
#35
Pro
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Montreal and Texas
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One thing that I noticed when I whent on that same Dynapac, last year, with my old Vitesse stage one kit, is that the gear ratio used , when doing a run, will affect the numbers down the line. If the Dynapac tech, dosen't enter the right gear ratio,then you will get higher or lower numbers.
I know, I got 337rwhp at 17psi with the Vitesse stage 1, and my buddy edman951 got 305rwhp with a k26/6 with Danno's MAP.
When I inquired what gear ratio they had used for his run, I found out that it wasn't the same as mine????
That could easily explain why he got such high numbers.
I know, I got 337rwhp at 17psi with the Vitesse stage 1, and my buddy edman951 got 305rwhp with a k26/6 with Danno's MAP.
When I inquired what gear ratio they had used for his run, I found out that it wasn't the same as mine????
That could easily explain why he got such high numbers.
