Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

My new intercooler!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2004 | 03:48 PM
  #31  
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
Crazy Eddie

Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,988
Likes: 70
From: Los Altos, CA
Default

So Tony
What your saying is that if you don't change the Intercooler / and Head(?)
Top end ?
Then, the improvements made to the intake wont really be a benefit ?
Thanks
Ed
Old 07-02-2004 | 08:28 PM
  #32  
Tomas L's Avatar
Tomas L
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Boden, Sweden
Default

You would be much better off, with less pressure drop, installing the core in such a way that you are feeding the largest quantity of core.. not the longest length core.
As with everything this is a compromise.
With the rows this way you will have a higher pressure drop but a better cooling efficiency. If you build it the other way with many short tubes you will have lower pressure drop but worse cooling efficiency.
You pick and choose which you prefer....

Tomas
Old 07-02-2004 | 08:48 PM
  #33  
toddk911's Avatar
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
From: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Default

How the hell does it fit in the stock location???

yea, the CF plenum is nice.
Old 07-03-2004 | 02:19 AM
  #34  
eclou's Avatar
eclou
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,083
Likes: 1,236
From: Houston, TX
Default

The most important part of this thread is the fact that Tony G is back! Tony, I want to that your past posts for helping decide to do a 27/6. My car is fast as sh*t now with little lag.
Old 07-03-2004 | 02:39 AM
  #35  
Darius Juca's Avatar
Darius Juca
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
From: Orangevale, CA. USA
Default

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be much better off, with less pressure drop, installing the core in such a way that you are feeding the largest quantity of core.. not the longest length core.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


As with everything this is a compromise.
With the rows this way you will have a higher pressure drop but a better cooling efficiency. If you build it the other way with many short tubes you will have lower pressure drop but worse cooling efficiency.
You pick and choose which you prefer....

Tomas

Easy!!! the ladder...cooler air and just turn up the boost to compensate for the pressure drop....

TonyG ..what do you mean when you say this
"Also.. like the factory intercooler end take (the side feeding the intercooler), you should taper in a reverse radius the end take to distribute the air better...
also what do you think about Lindsey's stage I and II intercoolers? did they taper? I am looking to do modify my own intercooler and am open to ideas...I'll probably cut up the end tanks and go from there..any suggestions?
Old 07-03-2004 | 02:42 AM
  #36  
NZ951's Avatar
NZ951
Race Director
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,778
Likes: 5
From: New Zealand massive
Default

Darius, any info on that cam we were talking about?
Old 07-03-2004 | 03:59 AM
  #37  
SamGrant951's Avatar
SamGrant951
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 10,862
Likes: 34
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

TONY G! Yeaahhhhh.....update us on where have you been and whats new? What car is parked in your garage these days??? You have been missed!

sorry for the hijack.
Old 07-03-2004 | 06:57 AM
  #38  
TonyG's Avatar
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles
Default

Thomas L

>>As with everything this is a compromise.
With the rows this way you will have a higher pressure drop but a better cooling efficiency. If you build it the other way with many short tubes you will have lower pressure drop but worse cooling efficiency.
You pick and choose which you prefer....<<


Not really.

The intercooler serves a heat sink primarily.

Flipping the core around doesn't change the heat sink properties of the intercooler.

And the tiny bit of additional cooling (and we're talking small difference) is much more than offset by the drop in restriction across the intercooler.

Restriction, as mentioned in the above paragraph, produces heat by the simple fact that you have to run more boost out of the turbo, which heats up the air more, to get x amount of air through the intercooler.

Thus you're heating up the air more in the first place... much more, than the tiny bit of additional cooling benefits you receive by running the air though the core the long way.


You're alway better off, by far, building the intercooler in such a way that you maximize the quantity of "rows".

In this case.. it means flipping the core 90 degrees.. and putting the tanks on the top and bottom.


The reason you see intercoolers built the way the thead starter did, and the way most turbo kits do, is simply because it's easier to package into a car... That's the only reason.

TonyG
Old 07-03-2004 | 07:01 AM
  #39  
TonyG's Avatar
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles
Default

Darius Juca

Look at the end tank of the stock intercooler. It's not just a tank welded on... It's got a very specific shape.

It's shaped like that for a reason. (equal air distribution across the cores)

TonyG
Old 07-03-2004 | 07:05 AM
  #40  
TonyG's Avatar
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles
Default

eclou

Glad you like the K27/6. It's hard to beat on a stock engined street driven 951 (especially for the cost!)

TonyG
Old 07-03-2004 | 07:06 AM
  #41  
TonyG's Avatar
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles
Default

Crazy Eddie

You can have the best intake in the world... but if your intake / exhaust ports are stock, the cam is stock, cam timing stock, header stock... it's not going to do nearly as much as the same intake would do with a Millege head/cam/SFR header/free flowing turbine, etc....

And, with my red 951 (my old car now!), a fully ported stock intake made an additional 20+rwhp over a stock intake, same boost, no other changes.

However... off boost performance suffers as it will with any modification to the intake tract that increases the volumn of the intake runners or shortens the intake runners (general statement... not carved in stone!)



TonyG
Old 07-03-2004 | 07:46 AM
  #42  
NZ951's Avatar
NZ951
Race Director
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 13,778
Likes: 5
From: New Zealand massive
Default

Tony, help me with a cam choice! Dont want more revs, only will ever take it to 6500, want more down low power now...
Old 07-03-2004 | 08:56 AM
  #43  
Tomas L's Avatar
Tomas L
Pro
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: Boden, Sweden
Default

The intercooler serves a heat sink primarily.
Flipping the core around doesn't change the heat sink properties of the intercooler.
Do you with this mean that the IC is only supposed to store heat heat in itself, not dispense it to the athmosphere? If that's the case then it would heat soak in a couple of seconds and not do much good.

Still for the row orientation that doesn't matter, fewer and longer rows will increase thermal efficiency. This is common knowledge in heat exchanger design, higher velocity through a heat exchanger gives higher thermal effciency at the cost of higher pressure drop. The velocity has a strong effect on ecciciency.

Yes, a higher pressure drop gives higher temperature in to the IC and it also increases turbine backpressure which reduces VE.
The point here is that without trying it on your specific application you can't state that one orientation is better than the other.

Tomas

Last edited by Tomas L; 07-03-2004 at 09:33 AM.
Old 07-03-2004 | 03:10 PM
  #44  
Corleone's Avatar
Corleone
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 474
Likes: 4
From: Sweden
Default

Bra sagt Tomas!
Old 07-03-2004 | 03:25 PM
  #45  
TurboTommy's Avatar
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Default

If I had a choice, I will always choose less pressure drop over more IC cooling effeciency. The power lost from excess pressure drop is more than the gain you will get from slightly higher cooling effeciency. The main reason for this is because when fuel gets injected it evaporates and takes heat with it. The more heat that's left after the IC has finished its job, the more heat will be taken out by the evaporating fuel. Therefore, even if there are differences in IC effeciency, by the time the cylinder sees the charge, the charge densities are not that much different. Obviously, this is only good up to a point. If it's a bad IC or no IC, there would be never enough fuel to take out enough heat.
That being said; if the IC is big enough, it wont matter which way the rows tranverse because the flow will always slow down enough for the least amount of pressure drop AND maximum cooling effeciency. Looks like this IC is nice and big!
Lag is a non issue. The less pressure drop will always make up for the fraction of a second that the turbo might take longer to make full boost.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:20 PM.