Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Latest Dyno Run - SFR 420 Kit - New Turbo @ 17.5 - 18psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2003, 09:00 PM
  #31  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Not in bed! Its lunch time! Good idea about the catch can... I need more space in my bay. What is a good spark plug gap with my set up? I have always been a little unsure...
Old 01-01-2004, 11:56 PM
  #32  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I did a little digging and found this article. My first reaction was that reducing the plug gap by that much was excessive unless you run the engine 99% of the time under high compression ratios (boost).
Ignition

The first order equation for Ignition voltage output is:

Vo = 6.66*Sqrt(d*S) + 24.44*d*S
: where: Vo = electrical strength of the gap
: d = Relative Air Density (RAD) versus Standard Atmosphere (STP)
:RAD is the combination of temperature, barometric pressure, and humidity
: S = distance between the electrodes (in cm)

This doesn't address different metals used in the gap or different gas mixtures for the air. It does show that decreasing the gap has a direct effect on Vout but compression preasure is measured as a ratio of relative preasure vs STP. I am just looking at the math, sorry to say you are way above anything I have had to deal with. My calculations would put the gap at 0.025 for a 17lb boost to keep the same Vo as 14lb boost. You stated that a gap of 0.022 would smooth out the problem. Did you try this?



Last edited by Bri Bro; 01-02-2004 at 02:24 AM.
Old 01-02-2004, 06:13 AM
  #33  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Nice!!
It would be interesting to hear more about the how the car felt with the new versus old turbo.
I suppose spool up is reduced with lower A/R on the hot housing, but how about the top end pull?
Old 01-04-2004, 11:02 AM
  #34  
Tomas L
Pro
 
Tomas L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Boden, Sweden
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anybody tried an air/water intercooler on a 951?
With the limited space we've got it could be a solution.
It should be possible to find room for the watercooler somewhere in the front or perhaps near the gearbox. Or you can use two or more smaller watercoolers.
It will add a little more complexity with a waterpump and plumbing but could worth the trouble.

Tomas
Old 01-04-2004, 02:16 PM
  #35  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Tomas L

I've researched it...

Air Water intercooling system are dependant on the volumn of water contained, and the pumping capability of the pump. The more the better...

Thus for a system to be worth anything (at least for track use) it's going to have a large radiator, and a high flow pump.

And with that we're back pretty much at square one... surface area/volumn for the heat exchangers.

The only non used area is in front of the front wheels, using the driving light duct. Perhaps a pair of heat exchangers for the air/water intercooler could be located there... thus saving having to build a customer engine radiator...

There's plenty of room in the engine bay fora serious air/water intercooler for sure.

TonyG
Old 01-04-2004, 04:36 PM
  #36  
badcoupe
Three Wheelin'
 
badcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Connersville IN
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I used a air to water intercooler in the last turbo car i put together. Great for drag racing but I don't think it would last long enough for a track session. We had to drain and reice every to hours or so, approx 2 passes. after one pass most of the ice was gone and the water was just about 60 deg.
Old 01-04-2004, 06:06 PM
  #37  
Matt H
Race Director
 
Matt H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

TonyG - do you have the p/n from the plugs you were using? I need to order some and I believe you mentioned you were running NGK-R plugs but I dont remember seeing what plug number.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 01-04-2004, 06:24 PM
  #38  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

beab951

Your calculations really can't come up with a required gap setting based on boost. The boost measurement is taken at the intake plenum, and has zero bearing on what portion of that air actually makes its way into the combustion chamber, thus one car at 18psi boost can be making 300RWHP and the other making 400RWHP, which in this case, the density of the air in the combustion chambers of these two cars is night-and-day different.

What I have found out, through plain old dyno testing, is that around 375RWHP, the gaps have to come down to .028" At 400RWHP, the gaps have to come down to about .020" (stock ignition to stock ignition).

TonyG
Old 01-04-2004, 06:27 PM
  #39  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Matt H

NGK-R

BPR7ES

Gap them around .028 to start with.

TonyG
Old 01-04-2004, 06:29 PM
  #40  
Matt H
Race Director
 
Matt H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thanks, did you snag them at autozone or did you have to order them?
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 01-04-2004, 06:54 PM
  #41  
Ben Z.
Burning Brakes
 
Ben Z.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Napa had them in stock.
Old 01-04-2004, 06:59 PM
  #42  
Matt H
Race Director
 
Matt H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,712
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Cool, will pick them up on my way home tomorrow!
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 01:02 PM
  #43  
kasturbo
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
kasturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Grove City, OH
Posts: 3,526
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tony, Wormhole posted this pic in another thread. Thought you might be interested as this looks like what you described doing to your car. Are you going to try to keep your front end looking stock?

Old 01-08-2004, 01:14 PM
  #44  
MySwiss
Pro
 
MySwiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Montreal and Texas
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice.
Old 01-08-2004, 02:40 PM
  #45  
rhesus
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
rhesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: socal
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

*whimper*


Quick Reply: Latest Dyno Run - SFR 420 Kit - New Turbo @ 17.5 - 18psi



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:58 PM.