60 to 100 mph
12-17-2003, 11:34 PM
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: puerto rico
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
60 to 100 mph
last night a was record the time from 60 to 100 in third gear to 6,700rpm,and i clocks 5.28seconds.
who done this test , and what time clocks and modifications?
i have guru chips, 55 ing. turbonetix to4 b super h with kkk #8, 18lbs of boost and a delta gate.
who done this test , and what time clocks and modifications?
i have guru chips, 55 ing. turbonetix to4 b super h with kkk #8, 18lbs of boost and a delta gate.
12-18-2003, 08:46 AM
#3
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I did 5.9 seconds. This was done from a cruising start (not WOT) and with the second half of the run slightly uphill. I'm running Guru MAP (13 psi at redline) with the rest of the car 100% stock.
12-27-2003, 05:07 AM
#4
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We need to get someone with a stock car to do this so we have a starting point. My car - 6.5 sec. Running superchips only. Anyone? You only need a stop watch - easy test...
Trending Topics
12-27-2003, 03:31 PM
#8
Going with the pack
is quite monotonous.
Rennlist Member
is quite monotonous.
Rennlist Member
Rage and mark - I just read this after the 0-100 thread...
Something strange...?
Mark's 0-100 is like 8.7
Rage's is I think 9.1
How can he be that much faster 60-100? Do your tires stink that bad(rage)?
Something strange...?
Mark's 0-100 is like 8.7
Rage's is I think 9.1
How can he be that much faster 60-100? Do your tires stink that bad(rage)?
12-27-2003, 03:47 PM
#9
Intermediate
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indianapolis,IN
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats the bad thing about these cars , you really need a set of slicks to get any kind of traction , but who wants to chance braking something when you hook up with that kind of sticky tire. I'm running on 6 year old BFG t/a's so I don't get alot of traction , but I still go pretty fast.
My times are with my G-tech pro comp.
My times are with my G-tech pro comp.
12-27-2003, 04:01 PM
#10
Intermediate
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indianapolis,IN
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also , I used the G-tech's stored runs to calculate my 60-100mph run .
I took my 12.26 @121 mph run and took my 0-60 time (4.175) and subtracted it from my 0-100mph run (8.713) to get my 60-100 time of 4.538
I took my 12.26 @121 mph run and took my 0-60 time (4.175) and subtracted it from my 0-100mph run (8.713) to get my 60-100 time of 4.538
12-27-2003, 05:35 PM
#13
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK Mark answered my question from the other thread 
.
I actually used a G-Tech Pro Comp on my car to compare as well. At the track I was doing 12.7@117mph, on the G-Tech Pro I was doing 11.6@130mph. 0-60 was 4s flat. In real life, I rarely see a 0-60 time of under 5.5s on my car. The problem was the rear dives a lot which messes up the readings, especially in the lower gears. On my AMG it was much more accurate, suspension is stiffer in that car, less rear dive. This problem plagues both the G-Tech Pro and the G-Tech Pro Competition. I actually lost a $100 bet with my 944 at the drag strip because of the G-Tech Pro. I was confident of making 120mph trap speeds, which never happened.
As for how I did my 0-60, 0-100, 60-100 time, I took an in car video of the speedometer during my drag run and did a frame by frame to calculate 0-60, 0-100, then subtracted the 2 to get 60-100.
0-60: 5.33s
0-100: 9.13s
60-100: 3.8s
It may be off by a frame or 2, which is about 0.03s per frame, so my numbers should be within 0.1s of actual times.
.I actually used a G-Tech Pro Comp on my car to compare as well. At the track I was doing 12.7@117mph, on the G-Tech Pro I was doing 11.6@130mph. 0-60 was 4s flat. In real life, I rarely see a 0-60 time of under 5.5s on my car. The problem was the rear dives a lot which messes up the readings, especially in the lower gears. On my AMG it was much more accurate, suspension is stiffer in that car, less rear dive. This problem plagues both the G-Tech Pro and the G-Tech Pro Competition. I actually lost a $100 bet with my 944 at the drag strip because of the G-Tech Pro. I was confident of making 120mph trap speeds, which never happened.
As for how I did my 0-60, 0-100, 60-100 time, I took an in car video of the speedometer during my drag run and did a frame by frame to calculate 0-60, 0-100, then subtracted the 2 to get 60-100.
0-60: 5.33s
0-100: 9.13s
60-100: 3.8s
It may be off by a frame or 2, which is about 0.03s per frame, so my numbers should be within 0.1s of actual times.
Last edited by rage2; 12-28-2003 at 01:44 AM.
12-27-2003, 09:21 PM
#15
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
A stock 951 takes ~9 seconds to do 60-100 mph (see http://www.weissach.net/924-944-968_...mmary.html#951 for accurately instrumented runs).
To get that sprint down to 4-5 seconds, you'd need to be making well north of 400 bhp.
Karl.
To get that sprint down to 4-5 seconds, you'd need to be making well north of 400 bhp.
Karl.