Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Criticism, contention, and censorship

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2016, 02:44 PM
  #31  
Randy V
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Randy V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Insane Diego, California
Posts: 40,449
Received 98 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Hilarious to see a post by Gretch in the 928 forum. Dude used to be a 928 enthusiast, but years of rennlist moderating have turned him into a moderating enthusiast only. He does love it so.

He has a hardon for me and doesn't realize I gave him his Range Master designation. I'm with him every day.

Randy V is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 04:45 PM
  #32  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dr bob
The mods walk a delicate line between keeping things civil vs letting natural selection work its way.

They also walk a commercial line with the site owners...


And lets be honest, use censorship when appropriate, it's not appropriate to use that term here.

It's not a public forum.
Speedtoys is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 05:03 PM
  #33  
Fogey1
Rennlist Member
 
Fogey1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Y-Bridge City, Zanesville, Ohio
Posts: 2,210
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
... And lets be honest, use censorship when appropriate, it's not appropriate to use that term here.
It's not a public forum.
Of course it can be apt, you're confusing simple censorship with issues around the First Amendment.

Non-governmental entities can and do censor within the realm over which they have power, but censorship by a private entity does not implicate the First Amendment.

When a private entity tries to get the state to enforce their censorship, that's a 1st Amendment issue - and a fairly common occurrence.
Fogey1 is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 05:25 PM
  #34  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fogey1
Of course it can be apt, you're confusing simple censorship with issues around the First Amendment.

Non-governmental entities can and do censor within the realm over which they have power, but censorship by a private entity does not implicate the First Amendment.

When a private entity tries to get the state to enforce their censorship, that's a 1st Amendment issue - and a fairly common occurrence.

No..im not.

This is a private forum, and is not preventing you from airing your 1st amendment rights, in public, or on your OWN private forum.

There is no "state" here.
Speedtoys is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 06:18 PM
  #35  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 501 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

First Amendment prohibits the government from doing something. Has nothing to do with what a forum can or can't do.
SeanR is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 07:01 PM
  #36  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

This thread now belongs in OT.
Bill Ball is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 09:29 PM
  #37  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
This thread now belongs in OT.
Don't you oppress me Bill.


Speedtoys is offline  
Old 10-29-2016, 09:58 PM
  #38  
Fogey1
Rennlist Member
 
Fogey1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Y-Bridge City, Zanesville, Ohio
Posts: 2,210
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
No..im not.

This is a private forum, and is not preventing you from airing your 1st amendment rights, in public, or on your OWN private forum.

There is no "state" here.
Either I'm missing your point or we're saying the same thing.

My point is that censorship exists on Rennlist but there's no state here and, therefore, there's no 1st Amendment issue.

As an example of Rennlist censorship, one is not allowed to post nude pix in the "I'd Hit It" thread without consequence.

As for Bill Ball, his relentless aggression against and oppression of other Rennlist members and users MUST STOP!!!
Fogey1 is offline  
Old 10-30-2016, 02:22 PM
  #39  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fogey1
Either I'm missing your point or we're saying the same thing.

My point is that censorship exists on Rennlist but there's no state here and, therefore, there's no 1st Amendment issue.

As an example of Rennlist censorship, one is not allowed to post nude pix in the "I'd Hit It" thread without consequence.

As for Bill Ball, his relentless aggression against and oppression of other Rennlist members and users MUST STOP!!!
Censorship does not exist on RL, because censorship is not apropos to private forums.

The owners of a private forum can do anything they want, and incur no legal penalties for saying shut up, or deleting your messages.

Censorship is not how you feel about it, but a clear direct legal issue.

"Censorship is the suppression of free speech, public communication or other information which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or inconvenient as determined by governments, media outlets, authorities or other groups or institutions."

IB/Mods kicking people out, removing posts, is within the legal rights of a private organization..and they're not keeping you from anything..the person or material removed from RL, can be posted on that persons own WWW page or their own forum, freely...publicly.
Speedtoys is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 08:21 AM
  #40  
linderpat
Rennlist Member
 
linderpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 14,507
Received 2,419 Likes on 1,312 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
This thread now belongs in OT.
Hear Hear!

It has devolved from entertainment to mindless pointless drivel, as do many threads in OT and PAC
linderpat is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 12:33 PM
  #41  
hwyengr
Rennlist Member
 
hwyengr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,014
Received 186 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
The owners of a private forum can do anything they want, and incur no legal penalties for saying shut up, or deleting your messages.
To drive this even further into OT:

That is 100% true, but what's troubling is that more and more of the world is becoming privatized, so there's less and less protection for basic 'freedoms'.
hwyengr is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 01:25 PM
  #42  
Jerry Feather
Rennlist Member
 
Jerry Feather's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 2706 Skyline Drive, Grand Junction CO 81506
Posts: 6,657
Received 610 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hwyengr
To drive this even further into OT: . . . more and more of the world is becoming privatized, so there's less and less protection for basic 'freedoms'.
That is a contradiction if I ever saw one. If there were no government there would be complete freedom. The main purpose of government is to limit freedom. The more of that we get the less free we become. Take the results of the 9-11 disaster as the greatest recent example. How free do you feel now trying to fly commercially, or even privately for that matter. I can't even get into my airplane hangar without a gate pass, and now I have to pay annually for that. I used to be free to just drive to the airport and unlock the gate and drive over to my Hangar. Now, with more government . . . . .
Jerry Feather is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 01:25 PM
  #43  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 549 Likes on 412 Posts
Default

A pretty substantial portion of the world's media outlets are private. Most "public" outlets have sponsors who define limits on what they will allow on "their" sponsored outlets. Everyone has a message to share. Finding the "right" outlet that will host your message may not be a challenge at all. Find one that will host it .and. has sufficient target audience for your message can be the challenge.

Facebook, Twitter, etc, are modern popular conduits for your messages, ASSuming you can find followers who might share your views, of course, and that they can somehow discover and like your messages enough to subscribe.

The wild wild west of this stuff is still usenet. Anybody here use (or remember...) usenet? It's a very early threaded messaging system that supports threaded discussion, segregated by theme and then subject. Google has assumed the task of maintaining usenet and its archives as "Google Groups", so it can now be accessed using a browser, rather than a dedicated bit of "reader" software that simpllified the organization of the threads and content.

Usenet still exists, and I suspect that whatever particular message you want to share can find a home and an audience somewhere in the usenet universe. Like Rennlist, it's relatively anonymous. Unlike Rennlist, it's pretty much self-censoring. That has it's positives in that you can post whatever you want. You need to be ready for the responses however, which can quickly get vicious and seem personal if your messages aren't to the theme and subject being discussed. I recommend that folks who feel the RL is too restrictive go give usenet a try.
dr bob is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 02:40 PM
  #44  
hwyengr
Rennlist Member
 
hwyengr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,014
Received 186 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jerry Feather
That is a contradiction if I ever saw one. If there were no government there would be complete freedom. The main purpose of government is to limit freedom. The more of that we get the less free we become. Take the results of the 9-11 disaster as the greatest recent example. How free do you feel now trying to fly commercially, or even privately for that matter. I can't even get into my airplane hangar without a gate pass, and now I have to pay annually for that. I used to be free to just drive to the airport and unlock the gate and drive over to my Hangar. Now, with more government . . . . .
Sigh. You mean less of the government that built your municipal airport? Or funds commercial airports? FAA landing fees don't come close to covering expenditures, so don't kid yourself into believing that's it's all paid for by user fees.

Good luck voting out the CEO of whatever corporation ends up buying the rest of your municipal assets in the next 10-20 years.
hwyengr is offline  
Old 10-31-2016, 03:21 PM
  #45  
Shawn Stanford
Rennlist Member
 
Shawn Stanford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Poconos
Posts: 5,266
Received 861 Likes on 473 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fogey1
My point is that censorship exists on Rennlist but there's no state here and, therefore, there's no 1st Amendment issue.
Originally Posted by Speedtoys
Censorship does not exist on RL, because censorship is not apropos to private forums. ... Censorship is not how you feel about it, but a clear direct legal issue.
Now, now: You're both very pretty.

Technically, 'censorship' refers only to an official act of suppression. However, the vernacular is that it applies to any act of suppression. While the technical definition is technically correct (which is the best kind of correct), it isn't the one that most people recognize. So, correcting non-technical use is, well, a waste of time.

Sort of like me, as a programmer, pointing out that a megabyte is not 1,000,000 bytes. It doesn't matter to anyone who isn't familiar with computers in a technical way.

Shawn Stanford is offline  


Quick Reply: Criticism, contention, and censorship



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:04 PM.