Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Major hesitation at wide open throttle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2016, 12:26 PM
  #61  
safulop
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
safulop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA (summer in Calgary)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

At least I know now it was never an ignition issue!
Old 02-22-2016, 12:27 PM
  #62  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 546 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
have you ever had the computers rebuilt?
Stan--

I put a rebuilt (by Elektronic Repair c/o Rich Andrade) LH box in it a year or so before Sean bought the car. Part of the summer troubleshooting exercise for the same symptoms last year included returning the box to the rebuilder, where it checked out OK.


The suggestion of "over-fueling" only on the open-loop map (speculation based on symptom description) is a head-scratcher for me. I'm not close enough road-test the LH to see if it's OK. With the relatively limited diagnostics in the pre-'89 car, it gets even tougher.
Old 02-22-2016, 02:16 PM
  #63  
safulop
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
safulop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA (summer in Calgary)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes it now appears we know the cause of the hesitation that was occurring only at full throttle - flooding, essentially. Could this be caused by intermittent Temp sensor connection? Anyway there is a troubleshoot sequence in the WSM for this system, I will ask my shop to go through it, and lend them the manual if they want it. According to the WSM the car is "inoperable" with the Temp sensor unplugged. I may have to get it towed to the shop, which will be the first time I've had an old Porsche towed in the 17 years I've owned one.
Old 02-22-2016, 02:40 PM
  #64  
safulop
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
safulop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA (summer in Calgary)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I found another thread stating a problem occurred from the LH not getting correct power from the positive battery terminal. Now, I made this problem a lot worse by playing with those wires and making sure they were tight. They were indeed tight, but they also look pretty bent and nasty on the ends, it would not surprise me if there were an intermittent connection at the positive battery terminal.
Old 02-22-2016, 02:45 PM
  #65  
safulop
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
safulop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA (summer in Calgary)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I also noticed my positive battery terminal bolt, the one with all the extra little wires attached, is covered with black grease and so are the ends of the wires. Why? Shouldn't it be clean?
Old 02-22-2016, 02:49 PM
  #66  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by safulop
Yes it now appears we know the cause of the hesitation that was occurring only at full throttle - flooding, essentially. Could this be caused by intermittent Temp sensor connection? Anyway there is a troubleshoot sequence in the WSM for this system, I will ask my shop to go through it, and lend them the manual if they want it. According to the WSM the car is "inoperable" with the Temp sensor unplugged. I may have to get it towed to the shop, which will be the first time I've had an old Porsche towed in the 17 years I've owned one.
all you have to do is wire in a 1200- 1500ohm resistor to get it to start and run and drive to where you need to drive.
Old 02-22-2016, 03:07 PM
  #67  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
have you ever had the computers rebuilt?
we chased our tails with the computers (the 6 liter devek car) for months.. had them rebuilt.. .WAAY WAY out of spec, said Rich. (10x out of spec) in the end, that wasnt the problem. it was that relay stuck in the wrong socket,, that ninnie!!
anyway, point is, i dont think even a bad set up MAF will be responsible for this dramatic of a problem unless they are really bad!

as far as the temp II, sounds like thats the issue, and just put in a simple resistor between the wires and it will start and run fine to get it to a shop... Or, if that does allow for it to start, just rewired the contacts and put in a new TEMP II sensor. its very easy to install.
Old 02-22-2016, 03:27 PM
  #68  
safulop
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
safulop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA (summer in Calgary)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes it was the installation of a new Temp II that caused this problem to resurface. I had suspected a bad reading from the old one due to overall rich running and a high cold idle. The car was somewhat better on the new sensor for a short while, until this problem came up again. But now I read John Speake in a another thread saying that the car should run OK with the sensor unplugged or giving no connection, since the LH defaults to a standard setting that does not adjust. So can these symptoms really be from a temp sensor connection gone bad?
Old 02-22-2016, 04:09 PM
  #69  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

No, I don't think it is temp 2, as was quoted above. Have you tried disconnecting the battery earth strap, unplugging the O2 sensor and then reconnect battery + start up ?

When you do that the LH defaults to mid range of the O2 loop, and often a car with an O2 sensor problem will then run very well.
Old 02-22-2016, 04:41 PM
  #70  
soontobered84
Rennlist Member
 
soontobered84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,964
Received 278 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

On my '89, my computers were getting insufficient grounds. When the computers found a good ground, the car ran like a top. When the computers couldn't find a good ground, the car would not run and would just shut off. If the ground was present but insufficient, the LH would , for some reason, think that the engine was running lean and dump more fuel. It would continue
Old 02-22-2016, 04:49 PM
  #71  
soontobered84
Rennlist Member
 
soontobered84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,964
Received 278 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

It would continue to add fuel until finally the Engine would not run any longer due to the excessive amount of fuel being delivered. The fix was to kick clean the computer grounds at the back of the V.
Old 02-22-2016, 04:57 PM
  #72  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 165 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by safulop
Yes it was the installation of a new Temp II that caused this problem to resurface. I had suspected a bad reading from the old one due to overall rich running and a high cold idle. The car was somewhat better on the new sensor for a short while, until this problem came up again. But now I read John Speake in a another thread saying that the car should run OK with the sensor unplugged or giving no connection, since the LH defaults to a standard setting that does not adjust. So can these symptoms really be from a temp sensor connection gone bad?
shoot... my comment was related to LJet... forgot you had a S4... short term memory loss.... carry on! sorry.
Old 02-22-2016, 04:59 PM
  #73  
safulop
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
safulop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA (summer in Calgary)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

^^^^^^^^^^^^^ OK this is starting to sound like what I need to do. I think it's the LH grounds, because that is exactly the behavior. Dumping more and more fuel until the car will not operate. And this is what it did in the summer. And the shop found baffling voltage/resistance readings at the LH pins, and reported that it had "lost ground control." For some reason they did not know how to deal with this. Cleaning the LH grounds "at the back of the V" is not something they thought of? Can you please describe where these grounds are located? Did you mean to say "kick clean" the grounds (not sure what that would mean).
Old 02-22-2016, 05:12 PM
  #74  
safulop
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
safulop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Fresno, CA (summer in Calgary)
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

OK are we talking about ground point V, above the CE panel in the passenger footwell?
Old 02-22-2016, 05:28 PM
  #75  
rbrtmchl
Pro
 
rbrtmchl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Park Ridge IL USA (Chicago suburb)
Posts: 542
Received 33 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

See this picture:

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...l#post11453110


Quick Reply: Major hesitation at wide open throttle



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:22 AM.