Oversize vs under size vs standard bearing shells
#31
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Mark-
Apologies for not being clear- the set of eight rod bearings immediately above were taken out of the '91 GT motor that I bought in 2008, which became my stroker motor. Those rod bearings went in the trash.
You can see the typical rod bearings from the junkyard motor I blew up at WSIR in the bottom right of this pic. Little bit wider and a little bit thinner than spec:
One junkyard motor shell vs. a 'normal' used shell:
Apologies for not being clear- the set of eight rod bearings immediately above were taken out of the '91 GT motor that I bought in 2008, which became my stroker motor. Those rod bearings went in the trash.
You can see the typical rod bearings from the junkyard motor I blew up at WSIR in the bottom right of this pic. Little bit wider and a little bit thinner than spec:
One junkyard motor shell vs. a 'normal' used shell:
#32
Rennlist Member
It is somewhat common for some engine builders to Scotch-Brite off that first grey "protective" layer from these bearings.
I'm not going to say if that is my practice....tiny details like this are quite proprietary....I'm just throwing it out for information purposes.
Porsche Motorsports (US) has always done this, on this style bearing, AFAIK.
Worth noting, this practice would also increase the oil clearance a bit.
I'm not going to say if that is my practice....tiny details like this are quite proprietary....I'm just throwing it out for information purposes.
Porsche Motorsports (US) has always done this, on this style bearing, AFAIK.
Worth noting, this practice would also increase the oil clearance a bit.
#33
Rennlist Member
OH my gosh.. what a mess!! uggg
anyway, no prob. I thought you used those and put them back in. was that the other set of bearings that didnt look quite as bad? (customer car .... "cobalt"?)
the rod bearing of the junkyard motor looks ok (edit) ( oh, that was the comparison bearing), that wider bearing the fact that it looks burned, is weird....... another discussion....still curious as to what went wrong there. As i posted you guys were not pushing that hard for the few laps at Willow that day... i was in the 1:33-4 for two full weekends (4 full hours of track time and races) and had no issues. Still wondering if it could have been something else that restricted oil flow back to the pickup.
another discussion .... i know... BUT.. i DONT like that old school early 928 pick up system it also looks too restrictive. pan spacer, old pick up system and then the windage tray, might be too much when there is high g loading... the oil might be able to pool in other places where the "ladle" of the newer pickup works better. maybe that is the reason for my success. after all, we are talking 20 years of racing the stockish 928 to its limit and many hours of high g loading.
btw... why was there a difference in bearing width?????? what is a "wide shell"? what up with all the parts looking burned! that engine might not have been in very good shape at all
anyway, no prob. I thought you used those and put them back in. was that the other set of bearings that didnt look quite as bad? (customer car .... "cobalt"?)
the rod bearing of the junkyard motor looks ok (edit) ( oh, that was the comparison bearing), that wider bearing the fact that it looks burned, is weird....... another discussion....still curious as to what went wrong there. As i posted you guys were not pushing that hard for the few laps at Willow that day... i was in the 1:33-4 for two full weekends (4 full hours of track time and races) and had no issues. Still wondering if it could have been something else that restricted oil flow back to the pickup.
another discussion .... i know... BUT.. i DONT like that old school early 928 pick up system it also looks too restrictive. pan spacer, old pick up system and then the windage tray, might be too much when there is high g loading... the oil might be able to pool in other places where the "ladle" of the newer pickup works better. maybe that is the reason for my success. after all, we are talking 20 years of racing the stockish 928 to its limit and many hours of high g loading.
btw... why was there a difference in bearing width?????? what is a "wide shell"? what up with all the parts looking burned! that engine might not have been in very good shape at all
Mark-
Apologies for not being clear- the set of eight rod bearings immediately above were taken out of the '91 GT motor that I bought in 2008, which became my stroker motor. Those rod bearings went in the trash.
You can see the typical rod bearings from the junkyard motor I blew up at WSIR in the bottom right of this pic. Little bit wider and a little bit thinner than spec:
One junkyard motor shell vs. a 'normal' used shell:
Apologies for not being clear- the set of eight rod bearings immediately above were taken out of the '91 GT motor that I bought in 2008, which became my stroker motor. Those rod bearings went in the trash.
You can see the typical rod bearings from the junkyard motor I blew up at WSIR in the bottom right of this pic. Little bit wider and a little bit thinner than spec:
One junkyard motor shell vs. a 'normal' used shell:
Last edited by mark kibort; 11-03-2015 at 05:26 PM.
#34
Nordschleife Master
I'm not convinced that the 2&6 are in any way special _except_ if the pickup sucks air. Then they are special, because they get more air and they get it earlier than other rod bearings.
#35
Rennlist Member
my thoughts too..... but i think that is the point, as they would fail first, but most interpret it as look at those bearings first ...I dont know if that means anything.... as they all seem to wear the same based on conditions, until there is a problem, and the 2-6 gets the problem first. maybe looking at them at rebuild time, shows if there has been any close calls and there might be more wear there.
#38
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
why was there a difference in bearing width?????? what is a "wide shell"? what up with all the parts looking burned!
The 2/6 crank journal got a little warm too:
#39
Rennlist Member
we saw some warm crank journal in Scots junkyard motor as well. luckily it locked up the crank rather than exploded like yours. however, the bearings were jacked up, but they didnt get pounded wider.
#40
Rennlist Member
this is what the bearings should look like on a high mileage car. (pay no attention to the scratches .. its amazing how dinged up they get being stored in a plastic bag)
only one set looks to have a worn (shiny) area the rest , the bearing coating was in tact.
this came off a high mileage 4.7 liter US
only one set looks to have a worn (shiny) area the rest , the bearing coating was in tact.
this came off a high mileage 4.7 liter US
#41
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Twin Turbo Todd has done that a few times, re-used rod bearings. I remember one engine that had 150k or more miles on them.
If they spec out OK, he puts them right back in.
Now, that being said, people need to remember that in his "day job" he pours his own babbitt and makes bearings for industrial applications. He's more than qualified to inspect an automotive bearing for re-use.
If they spec out OK, he puts them right back in.
Now, that being said, people need to remember that in his "day job" he pours his own babbitt and makes bearings for industrial applications. He's more than qualified to inspect an automotive bearing for re-use.
#42
Nordschleife Master
I've re-used rod bearings. I don't want to spend $150 on bearings that are new when the old ones don't have many miles on them, look good and are working fine.
I do spurge for the new nuts.
I do spurge for the new nuts.
#43
Rennlist Member
rod nuts??? i just use some lefter over 13 or 14mm loose home depot nuts i have laying around.
#44
Captain Obvious
Super User
Super User
Every time you replace a good functioning part, you are introducing the chance of a failure. Just because the replacement part is new, doesn't mean it is good. As I said before, 3 different standard sizes can easily create a disaster for the average guy. These bearings are easy to inspect. They are basically a bent piece of metal plate. Inspect the surface, measure the dimensions and that's it.
#45
Rennlist Member
Every time you replace a good functioning part, you are introducing the chance of a failure. Just because the replacement part is new, doesn't mean it is good. As I said before, 3 different standard sizes can easily create a disaster for the average guy. These bearings are easy to inspect. They are basically a bent piece of metal plate. Inspect the surface, measure the dimensions and that's it.
i guess its a judgement call..... but i would think anyone building an engine (and changing rod bearings are probably the most technical part, even if the other parts of an engine are not removed) would do the plastigauge test to make sure the gaps are right