Uneven front tire wear - camber or toe in?
#16
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
toe out .... you can adjust that yourself with a magic marker and a level . make sure you drive the heck out of it for a day or so, and then measure the distance between front of the tires and rear of the front tires. use the marker to mark the distances on the driveway, and then measure the distances . I would bet the front of the front tires is about .25" greater/wider than the rear of the tires. the distances is something like 70"out side of the front tires to each other.... you want it about even or slightly toe'ed in by 1/8".
Or is this measure, lift, adjust, drive, measure and repeat?
Thanks
#17
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
so, place the straight edge on the side of the tire/wheel and mark the spot on the driveway with the magic marker. do it the same way both front to rear and side to side.... roll car back, or slide measuring tape accoss under car and measure the dots. you should see about .25 toe out from that wear patterns if its been going on for a few 1000 miles.
don't forget to counter hold the tie rods by the flat spot... don't want to give too much stress to the ball joint connection point.
Yes, then go out and drive and come back and retest.....
#18
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Or you can follow the workshop manual and pull the suspension down once it's fitted to the alignment rack.
That is the proper way to do it.
Arbitrarily driving it X miles hoping it fully settles before having it aligned is not.
A proper alignment starts with lifting the car off the ground to inspect the suspension. This cannot be done with the weight of the car on the tires / suspension. A good alignment tech will insist on doing this since a bad ball joint, tie rod, suspension bushing etc.. can effect the alignment and you cannot properly check these parts with the cars weight loading up the suspension pieces.
If you are really ****, you will load up the drivers seat with ballast close to your weight.
Here is my reoccurring post on this subject complete with WSM pages on how to do a 928 alignment:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...l#post11159541
Yup, this is why most shops with mechanics on book time have a motto: "Set the toe and let it go" since that has the biggest effect on tire wear.
That is the proper way to do it.
Arbitrarily driving it X miles hoping it fully settles before having it aligned is not.
A proper alignment starts with lifting the car off the ground to inspect the suspension. This cannot be done with the weight of the car on the tires / suspension. A good alignment tech will insist on doing this since a bad ball joint, tie rod, suspension bushing etc.. can effect the alignment and you cannot properly check these parts with the cars weight loading up the suspension pieces.
If you are really ****, you will load up the drivers seat with ballast close to your weight.
Here is my reoccurring post on this subject complete with WSM pages on how to do a 928 alignment:
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...l#post11159541
Yup, this is why most shops with mechanics on book time have a motto: "Set the toe and let it go" since that has the biggest effect on tire wear.
#19
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Measuring the fully settled state then driving the car while employing some maneuvers (hard cornering and sudden stops) to fully settle the suspension is the only way to be sure.
#20
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark believes that his method with stick against the tire and the crayons/markers is accurate. It may be 'close enough' to get you safely to the alignment shop but not much more. The faces of the tires are not reliably true to the wheel, and the marks he makes on the asphalt are wider than the total allowance at tire edges. Like using a yardstick to measure thousanths of an inch.
Find a good shop that can do it correctly, or learn to do it correctly yourself. You can buy or build the needed pieces if you want to take a run at it yourself. There are several references to DIY alignment here on Rennlist. Search for posts by Earl Gillstrom to find a reasonable method using strings and a machinist's scale for setting toe.
Find a good shop that can do it correctly, or learn to do it correctly yourself. You can buy or build the needed pieces if you want to take a run at it yourself. There are several references to DIY alignment here on Rennlist. Search for posts by Earl Gillstrom to find a reasonable method using strings and a machinist's scale for setting toe.
#21
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes, I agree this is the procedure called out in the WSM, however you are still leaving the amount of pull down at the tech's discretion - you will never be sure he pulled it all the way down.
Measuring the fully settled state then driving the car while employing some maneuvers (hard cornering and sudden stops) to fully settle the suspension is the only way to be sure.
Measuring the fully settled state then driving the car while employing some maneuvers (hard cornering and sudden stops) to fully settle the suspension is the only way to be sure.
Yes I've done it myself.
Quite frankly, if an alignment tech cannot properly pull down a 928 before doing the alignment, I wouldn’t trust them with any other aspects of working on my car either.
#22
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Most 928 owners only use an alignment shop for that purpose - rarely do they also do other mechanical repairs. I'd trust a guy to do my alignment if that's all he does every day for a living.
![Stick Out Tongue](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#23
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark believes that his method with stick against the tire and the crayons/markers is accurate. It may be 'close enough' to get you safely to the alignment shop but not much more. The faces of the tires are not reliably true to the wheel, and the marks he makes on the asphalt are wider than the total allowance at tire edges. Like using a yardstick to measure thousanths of an inch.
Find a good shop that can do it correctly, or learn to do it correctly yourself. You can buy or build the needed pieces if you want to take a run at it yourself. There are several references to DIY alignment here on Rennlist. Search for posts by Earl Gillstrom to find a reasonable method using strings and a machinist's scale for setting toe.
Find a good shop that can do it correctly, or learn to do it correctly yourself. You can buy or build the needed pieces if you want to take a run at it yourself. There are several references to DIY alignment here on Rennlist. Search for posts by Earl Gillstrom to find a reasonable method using strings and a machinist's scale for setting toe.
anyway, if your objection is the face of the tire, that's an easy fix by putting some parts on the level to hit the rim only. and if you don't like the magic marker, you can use a can of spraypaint and get an exact position on the ground..... its repeatable and very accurate.
#24
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think we are over complicating things here, pulling down a 928 to proper ride height isn't very difficult which is why I find it so frustrating we are so stuck on "no lift" alignments.
Yes I've done it myself.
Quite frankly, if an alignment tech cannot properly pull down a 928 before doing the alignment, I wouldn’t trust them with any other aspects of working on my car either.
Yes I've done it myself.
Quite frankly, if an alignment tech cannot properly pull down a 928 before doing the alignment, I wouldn’t trust them with any other aspects of working on my car either.
Yes, I agree this is the procedure called out in the WSM, however you are still leaving the amount of pull down at the tech's discretion - you will never be sure he pulled it all the way down.
Measuring the fully settled state then driving the car while employing some maneuvers (hard cornering and sudden stops) to fully settle the suspension is the only way to be sure.
Measuring the fully settled state then driving the car while employing some maneuvers (hard cornering and sudden stops) to fully settle the suspension is the only way to be sure.
I should make a video of my home technique. its pretty good and like I mention, its very close to the shop technique... just takes a lot longer and really is to fix a gross problem as an intern fix before you hit the alignment shop.
#25
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've done it a couple times myself at the local shop and they've been aligning 928's for over 20 years. Nothing to it for an alignment tech with half a brain.
Again, if you cannot rely on your alignment tech to know how to properly set ride height, they are not qualified to do anything else on your car.
Next thread: Why Jiffy Lube is the best place to have your oil and transmission fluid changed... I mean, that's all they do, day in and day out. A 928 is just another car for them to work on...right?
The WSM is very detailed with the alignment procedures. If your place cannot follow those steps, time to find someone that can.
#26
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark, I guess the reason I continue to doubt the accuracy of your method is that the difference in distance between front and rear of an 18" wheel at correct toe is a lot less than 1/8" total. Grab your calculator and remind me what number you think it is to get 15-20 minutes of total toe-in at 18" spacing. Then remind me how you think a stick pressed against the tire is good enough for that. I fully understand how you put a mark at the stick and only measure the cutoff edge of the mark at the stick.
For a run to the alignment shop it may be OK for you. For an emergency adjustment between sessions at the track, it may be OK for you. Please add that disclaimer to your description of your method, so folks won't actually believe the alignment is correct after they try it.
----
For those playing at home, the normal error tolerance/allowance in most commercial machines is greater than what the 928 will tolerate. Find a shop that has a new machine, a capable/knowledgeable/willing tech running it, and you stand a chance of keeping tires on the car. I quickly went through some expensive tires after having the car on a recommended rack with the recommended guy in the recommended shop. Took it back for a recheck, and his machine still showed it the same (perfect) as it had left. Everything was fine except the tires were getting corded quickly on the insides. In self-defense, I started looking at alternatives to commercial alignment. I started off with the basic string alignment that Earl Gilstrom uses, and found that my 'perfect' alignment wasn't really that close. It was only toe'd out half a degree, should have been toe'd in a quarter of a degree. Using the MK method at 18", that's a difference of 0.141" total between what was there and what it should have been, or 0.070" at one end of his stick-against-the-tire and magic-marker on the pavement measurement, or 0.035" difference at each mark. That 0.035" is 3x what the difference is between zero toe and the recommended 15 minutes at 18" wheel edges. It's way less than you can see on the tape measure, even if you have "perfect" pen marks on the ground. At a couple $hundred per tire, I can't afford that kind of error.
So I spent some time building some laser fixtures that attach to the wheels, worked out a method that works perfectly every time, and never even consider taking any of the cars to an alignment shop any more. Not saying that you can't get a good commercial alignment, just shop carefully for the right machine, recently calibrated, with the right guy doing it. And don't let them lift the car unless you are sure that they can pull the body back down to your car's normal height front and rear, whatever that is, and hold it there while they adjust.
For a run to the alignment shop it may be OK for you. For an emergency adjustment between sessions at the track, it may be OK for you. Please add that disclaimer to your description of your method, so folks won't actually believe the alignment is correct after they try it.
----
For those playing at home, the normal error tolerance/allowance in most commercial machines is greater than what the 928 will tolerate. Find a shop that has a new machine, a capable/knowledgeable/willing tech running it, and you stand a chance of keeping tires on the car. I quickly went through some expensive tires after having the car on a recommended rack with the recommended guy in the recommended shop. Took it back for a recheck, and his machine still showed it the same (perfect) as it had left. Everything was fine except the tires were getting corded quickly on the insides. In self-defense, I started looking at alternatives to commercial alignment. I started off with the basic string alignment that Earl Gilstrom uses, and found that my 'perfect' alignment wasn't really that close. It was only toe'd out half a degree, should have been toe'd in a quarter of a degree. Using the MK method at 18", that's a difference of 0.141" total between what was there and what it should have been, or 0.070" at one end of his stick-against-the-tire and magic-marker on the pavement measurement, or 0.035" difference at each mark. That 0.035" is 3x what the difference is between zero toe and the recommended 15 minutes at 18" wheel edges. It's way less than you can see on the tape measure, even if you have "perfect" pen marks on the ground. At a couple $hundred per tire, I can't afford that kind of error.
So I spent some time building some laser fixtures that attach to the wheels, worked out a method that works perfectly every time, and never even consider taking any of the cars to an alignment shop any more. Not saying that you can't get a good commercial alignment, just shop carefully for the right machine, recently calibrated, with the right guy doing it. And don't let them lift the car unless you are sure that they can pull the body back down to your car's normal height front and rear, whatever that is, and hold it there while they adjust.
#27
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What a load of BS
I've done it a couple times myself at the local shop and they've been aligning 928's for over 20 years. Nothing to it for an alignment tech with half a brain.
Again, if you cannot rely on your alignment tech to know how to properly set ride height, they are not qualified to do anything else on your car.
Next thread: Why Jiffy Lube is the best place to have your oil and transmission fluid changed... I mean, that's all they do, day in and day out. A 928 is just another car for them to work on...right?
The WSM is very detailed with the alignment procedures. If your place cannot follow those steps, time to find someone that can.
I've done it a couple times myself at the local shop and they've been aligning 928's for over 20 years. Nothing to it for an alignment tech with half a brain.
Again, if you cannot rely on your alignment tech to know how to properly set ride height, they are not qualified to do anything else on your car.
Next thread: Why Jiffy Lube is the best place to have your oil and transmission fluid changed... I mean, that's all they do, day in and day out. A 928 is just another car for them to work on...right?
The WSM is very detailed with the alignment procedures. If your place cannot follow those steps, time to find someone that can.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#28
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark, I guess the reason I continue to doubt the accuracy of your method is that the difference in distance between front and rear of an 18" wheel at correct toe is a lot less than 1/8" total. Grab your calculator and remind me what number you think it is to get 15-20 minutes of total toe-in at 18" spacing. Then remind me how you think a stick pressed against the tire is good enough for that. I fully understand how you put a mark at the stick and only measure the cutoff edge of the mark at the stick.
For a run to the alignment shop it may be OK for you. For an emergency adjustment between sessions at the track, it may be OK for you. Please add that disclaimer to your description of your method, so folks won't actually believe the alignment is correct after they try it.
----
For those playing at home, the normal error tolerance/allowance in most commercial machines is greater than what the 928 will tolerate. Find a shop that has a new machine, a capable/knowledgeable/willing tech running it, and you stand a chance of keeping tires on the car. I quickly went through some expensive tires after having the car on a recommended rack with the recommended guy in the recommended shop. Took it back for a recheck, and his machine still showed it the same (perfect) as it had left. Everything was fine except the tires were getting corded quickly on the insides. In self-defense, I started looking at alternatives to commercial alignment. I started off with the basic string alignment that Earl Gilstrom uses, and found that my 'perfect' alignment wasn't really that close. It was only toe'd out half a degree, should have been toe'd in a quarter of a degree. Using the MK method at 18", that's a difference of 0.141" total between what was there and what it should have been, or 0.070" at one end of his stick-against-the-tire and magic-marker on the pavement measurement, or 0.035" difference at each mark. That 0.035" is 3x what the difference is between zero toe and the recommended 15 minutes at 18" wheel edges. It's way less than you can see on the tape measure, even if you have "perfect" pen marks on the ground. At a couple $hundred per tire, I can't afford that kind of error.
So I spent some time building some laser fixtures that attach to the wheels, worked out a method that works perfectly every time, and never even consider taking any of the cars to an alignment shop any more. Not saying that you can't get a good commercial alignment, just shop carefully for the right machine, recently calibrated, with the right guy doing it. And don't let them lift the car unless you are sure that they can pull the body back down to your car's normal height front and rear, whatever that is, and hold it there while they adjust.
For a run to the alignment shop it may be OK for you. For an emergency adjustment between sessions at the track, it may be OK for you. Please add that disclaimer to your description of your method, so folks won't actually believe the alignment is correct after they try it.
----
For those playing at home, the normal error tolerance/allowance in most commercial machines is greater than what the 928 will tolerate. Find a shop that has a new machine, a capable/knowledgeable/willing tech running it, and you stand a chance of keeping tires on the car. I quickly went through some expensive tires after having the car on a recommended rack with the recommended guy in the recommended shop. Took it back for a recheck, and his machine still showed it the same (perfect) as it had left. Everything was fine except the tires were getting corded quickly on the insides. In self-defense, I started looking at alternatives to commercial alignment. I started off with the basic string alignment that Earl Gilstrom uses, and found that my 'perfect' alignment wasn't really that close. It was only toe'd out half a degree, should have been toe'd in a quarter of a degree. Using the MK method at 18", that's a difference of 0.141" total between what was there and what it should have been, or 0.070" at one end of his stick-against-the-tire and magic-marker on the pavement measurement, or 0.035" difference at each mark. That 0.035" is 3x what the difference is between zero toe and the recommended 15 minutes at 18" wheel edges. It's way less than you can see on the tape measure, even if you have "perfect" pen marks on the ground. At a couple $hundred per tire, I can't afford that kind of error.
So I spent some time building some laser fixtures that attach to the wheels, worked out a method that works perfectly every time, and never even consider taking any of the cars to an alignment shop any more. Not saying that you can't get a good commercial alignment, just shop carefully for the right machine, recently calibrated, with the right guy doing it. And don't let them lift the car unless you are sure that they can pull the body back down to your car's normal height front and rear, whatever that is, and hold it there while they adjust.
Again, its not that far off the actual hunter adjusted alignment. It's just harder to do.
I am not advocating this for permanent adjustment, but if done right and double checked, it can be.
I run this kind of alignment for 1000s of miles with no bad wear and we are talking DOT rubber, driving on city streets and my first sessions at the track.
the trapezoid you get (or rectangle
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
all you care about Is the 1/8" between the two side
the front mark is about 25" from the rear mark.
1/8 divide by 25 INV TAN. gives you 15mins total toe. (7 min per side)
or .25degree total toe.
1/8 of an inch is pretty detectable and repeatable. It gets you right in spec.
If you are finding hunter machines that are not calibrated or adjusted...... well, that's more the reason to check things with my method.
tell you what, worst case , you might be 0 toe.... so no wear really, or you mght be alittle more toe, like 25 min vs the spec of 15min. again, the range is pretty wide that wont wear the tires, but if you are set up at .5 degrees toe'ed out, you will get some nasty inside edge tire wear, pretty quickly.
Bob, remember, its the edge of the level that is making the mark on the ground... its pretty precise..... the size of the marker, as you admitted, doesn't matter. its more the surface and how you hold that level to the wheel
EDIT: the 25" distance from front to rear is how you get the most accurate angle of the tire. you put the level on the wheel at an angle .. as the mark hits the ground its about as wide as the tire ... you can even make it wider to get more resolution if you want.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#29
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark, for grins, see how much pressure it takes on the stick/tire to move any mark on the ground 1/32". That's the difference between OK and not OK if using your method. Extending the stick further from the wheel center amplifies the error as it expands the measurement range.
#30
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mark, for grins, see how much pressure it takes on the stick/tire to move any mark on the ground 1/32". That's the difference between OK and not OK if using your method. Extending the stick further from the wheel center amplifies the error as it expands the measurement range.
it's a pretty solid. Pressing the level against the wheel or tire, is pretty firm, and is very though to move it at all, even 1/32, but one (which is 1/16 over both tires) by the way, that would be another 7mins (.12 degrees) , so not enough to really make anything that bad on an alignment.
Its pretty accurate. If I had a brand new set of tires, I would have no problem trusting the toe after I measured it to be 1/8 toed in. its obviously not toed out..... no way.... worst case It might be a little more toe than spec or near 0. Neither one would be that much to worry about.