? for all the boys & girls running 19" wheels
#31
#32
Drifting
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seems like an *** backwards question to me.
Why NOT? If thats what he likes and was able to make it happen?
And to be honest it looked great, his car drew quite a bit of positive attention.
I mean why do any of us do half the crazy stuff we do to these 25+ year old cars? Obviously because it makes us happy.
Thats all that matters
Why NOT? If thats what he likes and was able to make it happen?
And to be honest it looked great, his car drew quite a bit of positive attention.
I mean why do any of us do half the crazy stuff we do to these 25+ year old cars? Obviously because it makes us happy.
Thats all that matters
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#33
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,529
Received 1,669 Likes
on
1,084 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's why they are on every performance built car made today from Corvettes to Lamborghinis.
At this point it's the consumer market that is driving suppliers to push lower-profile tires into racing. Not engineering.
Materials have gotten much lighter in the last 3 decades.
You guys missed my point or I didn't make it very well: You have to consider the whole package unless you are interested only in looks.
Except the added weight of the 16" tire will cancel out the larger wheel weight (if a cheap wheel of same width is used). Factor in that most 16" tires are now designed more for OLDER trucks and SUVs and it gets worse yet.
I have the same 928 with both sets and know that there's no difference in acceleration and I know what handles much better. My original 16s are decoration in my office and if they ever get put back on, it'll be for original show reasons only.
I run taller- and wider-than-stock wheels too and they do work better than stock.
I've improved the handling of many 928s, as far as the drivers are concerned, by having them get rid of huge, too-heavy 'bling' wheels in favor of a wheel/tire combination much closer to the design parameters of the suspension and car.
The last example was a '90 with 8x18" and 10x18" turbo-twist replicas. Those wheels with PZero tires were far, far heavier than then D90s it came with. It's now both faster (objectively) and handles better (subjectively) with 16" OE 928 wheels. It certainly looked The Bomb with the 18"ers. But, it drove like a truck. The owner was more interested in how it drove than in how it looked.
#34
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,529
Received 1,669 Likes
on
1,084 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In New England that limit is closer to 90mm unless you like getting your rims straightened twice a year.
f1 is a perfect example of the ability of a tall size wall tire to be stiff enough in a performance setting.
Too many variable to really make much of a judgement either way really.
Last edited by worf928; 06-08-2014 at 11:54 PM. Reason: TurboS doesn't come with 21"s...
#35
![Talking](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
That really isn't a true statement without the following qualifiers.
1. .....based on early 1970s technology
2........based on early 1970s tire size manufacturing abilities, cost and technology.
3......based on early 1970s knowledge of suspension/tire dynamics and materials.
Based on your logic Porsche Engineers also preferred cassette tapes!
![thumbsup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bigok.gif)
#36
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
....it should also be pointed out that the "Porsche Engineers" were the first to really " prefer LESS sidewall and set that example when they put 16s and later 17s on the 928 to begin with.
Remember that the norm back then was 15" and smaller. The same generation Ferarris were still running 15s.
Remember that the norm back then was 15" and smaller. The same generation Ferarris were still running 15s.
#37
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,529
Received 1,669 Likes
on
1,084 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That really isn't a true statement without the following qualifiers.
1. .....based on early 1970s technology
2........based on early 1970s tire size manufacturing abilities, cost and technology.
3......based on early 1970s knowledge of suspension/tire dynamics and materials.
Based on your logic Porsche Engineers also preferred cassette tapes!![thumbsup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bigok.gif)
1. .....based on early 1970s technology
2........based on early 1970s tire size manufacturing abilities, cost and technology.
3......based on early 1970s knowledge of suspension/tire dynamics and materials.
Based on your logic Porsche Engineers also preferred cassette tapes!
![thumbsup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/bigok.gif)
TL;DR: even in 2014, the largest-diameter OE wheel from Porsche has more sidewall than a 928 would have with 19" wheels.
#38
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
....and the 1971 Porsche 917 Race car had 17" rear wheels!
....and the 1987 Porsche 959 as an example came with 17s. (Ahead of its time again)
Porsche was leading with larger wheels for a long time. I'm sure choices had to be made about the consumers ability to buy tires too.
....and the 1987 Porsche 959 as an example came with 17s. (Ahead of its time again)
Porsche was leading with larger wheels for a long time. I'm sure choices had to be made about the consumers ability to buy tires too.
#39
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Rear is -.12" less and the front has .14" more sidewall. Hardly argument worthy differences.
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Rear.
![](https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2932/14192858020_f1575c6a13_b_d.jpg)
Front.
![](https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2936/14192777499_4b2c13997e_b_d.jpg)
#40
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,529
Received 1,669 Likes
on
1,084 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What size tires are you actually running? Your first post shows a different front tires size than you show in the above capture. If you are indeed running a 255/35-19 on the front as shown immediately above and not a 255/30-19 as in your first post then you have virtually the same sidewall height and not less and I stand corrected. You are of course at the very limit of what will fit in the wheel well; it's the same overall height I run on the front and everything has to be just right for no rubbing.
#41
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Kennedale,TX a suburb of DFW
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So for the guys that have moved to an 18 or 19 inch wheel, how do you like the ride compared to the earlier 16 or 17 inch? Better … worse … harder … Keep it simple please ... I'm a simple kind of guy!
I'm looking for the most comfortable and quiet ride!
I'm looking for the most comfortable and quiet ride!
#42
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What size tires are you actually running? Your first post shows a different front tires size than you show in the above capture. If you are indeed running a 255/35-19 on the front as shown immediately above and not a 255/30-19 as in your first post then you have virtually the same sidewall height and not less and I stand corrected. You are of course at the very limit of what will fit in the wheel well; it's the same overall height I run on the front and everything has to be just right for no rubbing.
![Cheers](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/beerchug.gif)
The second post I was actually at home and checked the tires to make sure of the size.
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
FWIW, I also have a 951 on 18s, a Cayenne Turbo with 18" winters/22" summers, a T4 Eurovan on 18s, an C5 S6 Avant on 18s and I think the 928S4 rides better than all of them. Nothing harsh about the ride at all.
#43
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
still break loos at 60 in 3rd gear.... I suspect that will get worse with the corvette 6 speed trans...... going in soon...
![ducking](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon107.gif)
#44