Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

swap euro S 1980 engine with euro S 1984 engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2014, 11:10 PM
  #16  
GerritD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
GerritD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: As - Belgium
Posts: 1,107
Received 75 Likes on 62 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Hilton
Hi Gerrit, send the user "Hopwood" a PM - he has an early '80 car with exactly the mod you're proposing done on it - i.e. K-jet but with 4.7L block/cams from '84 928S2. He's in England.
Hi Hilton,

that's fantastic, I'll send him an email straight away.

thanks!
Gerrit
Old 01-09-2014, 11:25 PM
  #17  
Richard S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Richard S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Elk Grove, Ca
Posts: 3,695
Received 123 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GerritD
That's new to me...how can you recognize early or later 84 engines,
from what VIN number?

Difference in valves or pistons' shape?
For M28/21 engines:
The left over 83 pistons were used up to engine number M28/21 82E 0596.
The newer 84 pistons started with engine number M28/21 82E 0597.

For M28/22 engines:
The left over 83 pistons were used up to engine number M28/22 82E 6113.
The newer 84 pistons started with engine number M28/22 82E 6114.

This info is found in the Porsche Parts Catalog. The difference is in the shape of the top of the pistons.

Hope this helps.

Rich
Old 01-09-2014, 11:35 PM
  #18  
GerritD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
GerritD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: As - Belgium
Posts: 1,107
Received 75 Likes on 62 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Richard S
For M28/21 engines:
The left over 83 pistons were used up to engine number M28/21 82E 0596.
The newer 84 pistons started with engine number M28/21 82E 0597.

For M28/22 engines:
The left over 83 pistons were used up to engine number M28/22 82E 6113.
The newer 84 pistons started with engine number M28/22 82E 6114.

This info is found in the Porsche Parts Catalog. The difference is in the shape of the top of the pistons.

Hope this helps.

Rich
Thanks alot Richard, this certainly helps!
Old 01-09-2014, 11:49 PM
  #19  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GerritD
That is what I was planning to do : new seals and gaskets together with overhaul waterpump.
My engine has loss of compression on cilinder 8 : 4bar instead of 8.5
I did a compression check (leak down) and it is the piston itself, probably worn segment ring or worn on cilinder surface (nikasil worn)
And this is quite expensive to overhaul : about $2000 only for setting a new layer of nikasil on all cilinders. Other cilinders had a compression loss of 15 to 20%, so I need to renew all cilinders if I want to do it properly.
Together with renewal of piston segment rings ,bearings,gaskets and seals it would cost me $6000 to $7000 dollar, the work not included and keeping the old pistons. If I need to replace pistons and valves, it would cost me nearly $10000 dollar.

Parts here in Europa are quite expensive for the Porsche 928.
Might be worth taking a look with a bore scope, the block is pretty tough so it could be just rings, and the 84 engine might need those as well. No need to Nikasil the block unless you go to a piston other than factory.
Old 01-10-2014, 02:52 AM
  #20  
GerritD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
GerritD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: As - Belgium
Posts: 1,107
Received 75 Likes on 62 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by danglerb
Might be worth taking a look with a bore scope, the block is pretty tough so it could be just rings, and the 84 engine might need those as well. No need to Nikasil the block unless you go to a piston other than factory.
Good idea of the bore scope, I might do that before swapping the engine.

thanks again!
Gerrit
Old 01-10-2014, 06:58 PM
  #21  
Ian928
Pro
 
Ian928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kristiansund, Norway
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am not sure the cams on the 84 are better than the 80 ones. There was a thread here about it and I seem to recall that the early cams had longer duration. Maybe try a search?
Old 01-10-2014, 07:49 PM
  #22  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ian928
I am not sure the cams on the 84 are better than the 80 ones. There was a thread here about it and I seem to recall that the early cams had longer duration. Maybe try a search?
no, the later cams have something like 8 degrees more duration. lift the same. Ive done this modification in most all forms over the past 20 years.
just put a 5 liter under the current heads cams and intake.

otherwise, no issues with going with the later cams and the newer block. the changes are so minor, they are not even worth mentioning.

Mark
Old 01-10-2014, 07:53 PM
  #23  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GerritD
Here in Europe the good old CIS (Kjetronic) 4.7L engine has 300hp , that's what I am aiming to achieve.
The 4.7l LH engine of the '84 model has 310hp, so there is not much difference.
The 5l engine has 320hp.
your missing the point. you can have what is exactly the same as the euro 4.7 84, BUT with 5 liter. by going with the US 85 short block (not S4) it was only rated at 288hp, but thats another story as of why (cams, heads, etc)

if you are aming to achieve 300hp, isnt that what you already have. what am i missing? either way, the best choise is to use the 4.7 euro shortblock either the old 80 to 83 or the newer , late 83 to 84. the differnce is the valve cuts in the pistons. the cams are near the same, but he 83 84s are longer duration. heads are the same. you already said you are going to keep it CIS from the earlier models, right. (pointing to single distrib, CIS, etc)

by the way, the cylinders are alusil not nicasil. (from your earlier post) the process would cost a little to freshen up your current block. having been down that road before, its much better to just re-ring an old block and put on some new rod bearings. dont even split the case if the engine is known to be fairly good.
the block wont give you any power, if you are not certain the pistons are the latest of the euro S 4.7s. the shallow piston cuts are the give away to the newer types. they are only a few mm on the later euro pistons. the main reason there is more power is the slightly better cams, slightly higher compression (10 to 10.4:1) and ignition timing. However, you can do the 5 liter short block and kick up the HP in a BIG way. all you need to do is notch the pistons only .177" cut out for the valves.
there is also a 10hp advantage of doing this by getting the piston offset right ..... another story all together.
Old 01-10-2014, 09:03 PM
  #24  
GerritD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
GerritD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: As - Belgium
Posts: 1,107
Received 75 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
your missing the point. you can have what is exactly the same as the euro 4.7 84, BUT with 5 liter. by going with the US 85 short block (not S4) it was only rated at 288hp, but thats another story as of why (cams, heads, etc)

if you are aming to achieve 300hp, isnt that what you already have. what am i missing? either way, the best choise is to use the 4.7 euro shortblock either the old 80 to 83 or the newer , late 83 to 84. the differnce is the valve cuts in the pistons. the cams are near the same, but he 83 84s are longer duration. heads are the same. you already said you are going to keep it CIS from the earlier models, right. (pointing to single distrib, CIS, etc)

by the way, the cylinders are alusil not nicasil. (from your earlier post) the process would cost a little to freshen up your current block. having been down that road before, its much better to just re-ring an old block and put on some new rod bearings. dont even split the case if the engine is known to be fairly good.
the block wont give you any power, if you are not certain the pistons are the latest of the euro S 4.7s. the shallow piston cuts are the give away to the newer types. they are only a few mm on the later euro pistons. the main reason there is more power is the slightly better cams, slightly higher compression (10 to 10.4:1) and ignition timing. However, you can do the 5 liter short block and kick up the HP in a BIG way. all you need to do is notch the pistons only .177" cut out for the valves.
there is also a 10hp advantage of doing this by getting the piston offset right ..... another story all together.
Mark,

I need to rectify perhaps the information I gave : the original engine of my car, before I bought it, was a 4.7l CIS 300hp (M28/12) delivered from factory. However when I bought the car, this engine had been replaced by a 4.5l CIS 240hp (M28/01) Apparently, the ignition, ecu, distributor, Bosch injection unit, injectors... are the same, as nothing of components around the engine had been changed.
So I want to have the original power of the 4.7l engine without having to change alot of my other parts.

kr
Gerrit
Old 01-11-2014, 07:05 AM
  #25  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GerritD
Mark,

I need to rectify perhaps the information I gave : the original engine of my car, before I bought it, was a 4.7l CIS 300hp (M28/12) delivered from factory. However when I bought the car, this engine had been replaced by a 4.5l CIS 240hp (M28/01) Apparently, the ignition, ecu, distributor, Bosch injection unit, injectors... are the same, as nothing of components around the engine had been changed.
So I want to have the original power of the 4.7l engine without having to change alot of my other parts.

kr
Gerrit
The non S Euro motor, the 4.5L has different intake tubes, throttle body, WUR (warm up regulator), heads, etc.
Old 01-11-2014, 07:37 AM
  #26  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,285
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
your missing the point. you can have what is exactly the same as the euro 4.7 84, BUT with 5 liter.
Mark, he's in Europe. Early 5L blocks are rarer than GTS motors over there.
Old 01-11-2014, 03:51 PM
  #27  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hilton
Mark, he's in Europe. Early 5L blocks are rarer than GTS motors over there.
but for the cost of shipping from 928intl, he would have a monster motor compared to what he has now, AND be cheaper than a rebuild if he was going that route (all the talk about fixing the block, rebuild, etc)

Originally Posted by danglerb
The non S Euro motor, the 4.5L has different intake tubes, throttle body, WUR (warm up regulator), heads, etc.
yep, but I seem to take from his post that he just has a 4.5L bottomend that was put under all the same stuff that was on the car. clarify?

Originally Posted by GerritD
Mark,

I need to rectify perhaps the information I gave : the original engine of my car, before I bought it, was a 4.7l CIS 300hp (M28/12) delivered from factory. However when I bought the car, this engine had been replaced by a 4.5l CIS 240hp (M28/01) Apparently, the ignition, ecu, distributor, Bosch injection unit, injectors... are the same, as nothing of components around the engine had been changed.
So I want to have the original power of the 4.7l engine without having to change alot of my other parts.


kr
Gerrit
so, in reading your post, it sounds like you have ALL of the 4.5 euro stuff on the engine as well. NONE of the euro 4.7 M28-12. so that would mean, cams are junk, intake is junk, throttle body. heads, and plenum are all junk. (compared to the euro 4.7 S models)

you need a euro 4.7 Long block, or you need to piece the thing together by getting: euro heads, cams, intake , throttle body, and a short block. the early 4.5 cis system should work.
Old 01-11-2014, 05:30 PM
  #28  
GerritD
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
GerritD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: As - Belgium
Posts: 1,107
Received 75 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
but for the cost of shipping from 928intl, he would have a monster motor compared to what he has now, AND be cheaper than a rebuild if he was going that route (all the talk about fixing the block, rebuild, etc)


yep, but I seem to take from his post that he just has a 4.5L bottomend that was put under all the same stuff that was on the car. clarify?



so, in reading your post, it sounds like you have ALL of the 4.5 euro stuff on the engine as well. NONE of the euro 4.7 M28-12. so that would mean, cams are junk, intake is junk, throttle body. heads, and plenum are all junk. (compared to the euro 4.7 S models)

you need a euro 4.7 Long block, or you need to piece the thing together by getting: euro heads, cams, intake , throttle body, and a short block. the early 4.5 cis system should work.
Mark,
you are absolutely right. Let me rephrase my question differently :

I have a spare engine of 1984 (I don't know yet if early or late 84),
what should I replace on the engine to fit it in my 928S, without changing my original wiring / ecu ?
I know that for an early 4.7l 300hp CIS, nothing has to be changed regarding cabling, since that's what the PO did when swapping the 4.7l 300hp CIS with the 4.5l 240hp CIS.

kr
Gerrit
Old 01-11-2014, 05:55 PM
  #29  
Snowglobe
Rennlist Member
 
Snowglobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Denver Foothills, CO
Posts: 128
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Slight side step, but on topic. I was interested in getting a 5.0 block to put under my 84 Euro 4.7. I was thinking of getting an 85/86 block while the getting was good, and then I could do the work later or resell the untouched block if I changed my mind. The 928 intl sale to maximize a hoarder's savings has already come and gone, but I was wondering how much more it would cost to convert an 84 Euro 4.7 to a 5.0 hybrid, versus rebuilding/refreshing the 4.7. Seemed like a lot of extra $$ for little gain, compared to doing that to a 4.5. I know there would be a lot of "it depends/wyait" in the calculation. If I was willing to get new pistons, it seems that increasing the displacement on the 5.0 at the same time would also be opportune, but those two choices would astronomically increase the cost differential to a refresh. I haven't even taken the heads off the 4.7 so I don't know the condition other than it seems to run well.
Old 01-14-2014, 12:15 PM
  #30  
danglerb
Nordschleife Master
 
danglerb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orange, Cal
Posts: 8,575
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

CI$ and LH injection have different injectors with different mounting in the intakes. You need a Euro S CI$ intake and throttle body. The WUR, warm up regulator is different, but I don't know in what way, just a different part number.

Something to consider with a 4.5 or 4.7L refresh vs 5.0L is that rings and headgaskets are I believe cheaper in the more common 100mm size.

Plenty of different things to consider, but I see the gains of the Euro hybrid well worth the costs.

Note the 32v 85/86 Euro motor is a lower compression than USA motor, so may not work as a hybrid motor bottom end.


Quick Reply: swap euro S 1980 engine with euro S 1984 engine



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:15 AM.