Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

AEM UEGO Install. Am I really running this lean at idle?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2013, 03:57 PM
  #16  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

You can use the WBO2 with the Sharktuner but IIRC you can't have a simulated NBO2 from it as well as the NB.
Old 10-20-2013, 04:00 PM
  #17  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,050
Received 37 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

I would use a short ground to the nearest chassis point.

If the A/F is really that lean then it means the O2 loop isn't able to hold the A/F to 14.7:1

Have you been through the idle CO setup proceedure in the WSM ?

Originally Posted by KenRudd
This install started as a spin off from another thread:

I wanted more information on how my car was running, so I installed an AEM UEGO AFR meter.
The sensor in installed on the unused second bung on my x-pipe, right across from the primary 02 sensor

First reports seem to show me running very lean at idle. This video shows typical with engine warm:
So:
1. Am I really that lean, or;
2. Am I seeing some type of power issue, or;
3. Other?

Secondary question: I left the sensor cable at full length, coiled up in console. It about 8 feet longer than I need. Is it okay to shorten this cable?
Old 10-20-2013, 05:14 PM
  #18  
KenRudd
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
KenRudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,080
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
I would use a short ground to the nearest chassis point.

If the A/F is really that lean then it means the O2 loop isn't able to hold the A/F to 14.7:1

Have you been through the idle CO setup proceedure in the WSM ?
Looking at ^^^^^this^^^^^^ now. Starts at page 24-205, right?

Updates: took car for a test drive. Engine fully warm, at highway cruise speed, with cruise cotnrol on to mitigate any manula pedal changes:

Looks lean to me. It does get rich when I mash the gas (not shown).
Also, although I epxected the readout to be "dynamic" I did not expected it to vary that rapidly/erractically. Is this normal?
Old 10-20-2013, 06:33 PM
  #19  
PHIL928
Pro
 
PHIL928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Dubai, UAE. Oxford UK during semester.
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I'm correct highway cruising AFR is usually slightly leaner to conserve fuel (AFAIK this is the case in most modern cars)
Old 10-20-2013, 07:06 PM
  #20  
CardinalCar
Instructor
 
CardinalCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KenRudd
Looks lean to me. It does get rich when I mash the gas (not shown).
Also, although I epxected the readout to be "dynamic" I did not expected it to vary that rapidly/erractically. Is this normal?
Yes that's about right. You're hovering around 14.7:1, which is stoich for gasoline. The cyclical behavior is because the LH is only getting what amounts to a binary signal from the stock narrowband sensor -- it's either too rich or too lean -- and it therefore makes a relatively coarse fuel adjustment to compensate. This is also how OBD2 cars know if the O2 sensor has failed; they count how many times the signal traverses the voltage equivalent of 14.7:1.

Attached is a screenshot from a later OBD2 car (via a bluetooth data logger) which has four O2 sensors and two cats -- each cat has a sensor on either side -- so you can see both how well the sensors work (upstream cycles, downstream remains steady because of the cat) and, by extension, whether the cats themselves are working.
Attached Images  
Old 10-20-2013, 10:02 PM
  #21  
KenRudd
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
KenRudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,080
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Very useful thread here, thanks Porken et al. Much more informative than WSM.
Old 10-20-2013, 11:01 PM
  #22  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PHIL928
If I'm correct highway cruising AFR is usually slightly leaner to conserve fuel (AFAIK this is the case in most modern cars)
Not on a 928, in closed-loop mode it is always hovering around 14.7:1 (unless something is wrong). LH 2.3 is too old to have that kind of feature.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
Old 10-20-2013, 11:42 PM
  #23  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,438
Received 1,607 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PHIL928
If I'm correct highway cruising AFR is usually slightly leaner to conserve fuel (AFAIK this is the case in most modern cars)
Modern catalytic converters are able to clean the elevated NOx levels that result from leaner-than-stoichiometric combustion. OE 928 cats are not that modern.

Originally Posted by dprantl
Not on a 928, in closed-loop mode it is always hovering around 14.7:1 (unless something is wrong). LH 2.3 is too old to have that kind of feature.
It's important to note the operating context when using terms like 'lean' or 'rich.' So, to be pedantic, at low-to-medium loads - i.e. 'cruise' and light acceleration - the target A/F ratio is the stoichiometric 14.7:1. This maximizes efficiency within the region of lowest overall HC and NOx.

At high-loads the target A/F ratio will be around 12.6:1. This maximize power, but results in high HC.

The WOT/idle switch is what tells the LH in which context to operate.
Old 10-20-2013, 11:45 PM
  #24  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,438
Received 1,607 Likes on 1,050 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
You can use the WBO2 with the Sharktuner but IIRC you can't have a simulated NBO2 from it as well as the NB.
Thanks John.

I will be blowing the dust off my Shark Tuner in a few weeks and I'm looking to supplement or replace the Innovate WBO.
Old 10-21-2013, 11:05 AM
  #25  
U-928
Pro
 
U-928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The 413
Posts: 606
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 123quattro
AEM is a much better wideband than Innovative and doesn't require a free air calibration
I'm curious as to if you have a specific reason for this statement or if it's just your opinion. Sure the free air calibration isn't fun, but in the years and years of operation of multiple Innovate WB's I've only ever done it once, and likely didn't need to. I was always under the impression that Innovate stuff was the benchmark?
Old 10-21-2013, 11:08 AM
  #26  
Ducman82
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,983
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Innovate products have never let me down, unlike my old AEM unit (not this car) and old auto meter units.
Old 10-21-2013, 01:11 PM
  #27  
KenRudd
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
KenRudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,080
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'll post back regarding any issues, but so far, very pleased with the AEM unit. Fits into OE clock opening with minor work, and at this point I am comfortable that it is showing correct values.

My current plan of attack is to install the new injectors and new O2 unit and then tweak the mixture as needed based on the WSM and Porken's write up in the above link. I'll be buidling a "Blink'r" for the adjustment and will compare those readings with what the AEM gauge reports.
Old 10-21-2013, 02:10 PM
  #28  
123quattro
Drifting
 
123quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Farmington Hills, MI
Posts: 2,973
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The heater control on the Innovative is very course. That leads to inconsistent temperature in the measuring element. That in tern affects the measured A/F ratio.

Innovative is much much better than not having a wideband. It's just not as good as the other widebands that are for sale.
Old 10-21-2013, 03:52 PM
  #29  
neilh
Rennlist Member
 
neilh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southport, NC
Posts: 1,602
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KenRudd
I'll post back regarding any issues, but so far, very pleased with the AEM unit. Fits into OE clock opening with minor work, and at this point I am comfortable that it is showing correct values.

My current plan of attack is to install the new injectors and new O2 unit and then tweak the mixture as needed based on the WSM and Porken's write up in the above link. I'll be buidling a "Blink'r" for the adjustment and will compare those readings with what the AEM gauge reports.
Ken, I've got an Innovate full kit and a 'blink'r' plus Porken's special tool over here in Cary ( Holly Springs at Ten-Ten) if you want to borrow them?
PM me if interested -

Neil
Old 10-21-2013, 04:30 PM
  #30  
KenRudd
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
KenRudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Apex, NC
Posts: 2,080
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

PM sent. Thanks!


Quick Reply: AEM UEGO Install. Am I really running this lean at idle?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:30 AM.