Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Low fuel economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2013 | 05:59 PM
  #1  
Leon Speed's Avatar
Leon Speed
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 3
From: Germany
Default Low fuel economy

I get 17 mpg on long high way cruises (about 75 mph/2800 rpm). Although it is a 24 year old 5 liter engine it seems a bit low for cruising. Or is it normal? Only things I haven't done since I own the car is check the MAF and ECU. Can these cause low fuel economy? What other possible culprits are there: rings, leaking dampers/regulators, carbon build up?
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:03 PM
  #2  
76FJ55's Avatar
76FJ55
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 143
From: Grapevine, TX
Default

Seems normal conpared to mine. I've heard of a few guys getting into the 20s but mine doesn't. Of course it seems I can manage to kill the fuel economy of anything I drive.
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:04 PM
  #3  
jeff spahn's Avatar
jeff spahn
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8,608
Likes: 404
From: Dubuque, IA
Default

I get about 18 (before the Supercharger went on) so you are right in there.
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:05 PM
  #4  
PorKen's Avatar
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,175
Likes: 412
Default

Has the O2 sensor been replaced?

Knock sensors? Cam angle/hall sensor? Retard will hurt mileage.

Cams at zero?


Autos will get a couple MPG less than manuals.
X-pipe will often drag down MPG - factory cats are best for mileage.



I managed 24.6 mpg (9.6 l/100km) in my '88 5-speed w/X-pipe on a 200+ mile round trip to the beach last month.
Pretty happy with that. Speeds were mostly below 70, though.
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:13 PM
  #5  
syoo8's Avatar
syoo8
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 946
Likes: 4
From: Columbia, MO / San Luis Obispo, CA
Default

I get 25 mpg highway with my 86, 22 with the 87. But the 86 has taller gearing.
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:14 PM
  #6  
Rob Edwards's Avatar
Rob Edwards
Archive Gatekeeper
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,687
Likes: 2,860
From: Irvine, CA
Default

I get 11-12 mpg. Must be that 2.73 rear end, lots of revs.
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:17 PM
  #7  
Leon Speed's Avatar
Leon Speed
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 3
From: Germany
Default

See that makes me wonder. 17 to 18 versus 22 or 24.6 (with x-pipe), that's a huge difference. Can't be all difference auto vs. manual can it?

Ken: O2 sensor has been replaced 5 years/35000 km ago.
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:19 PM
  #8  
Chalkboss's Avatar
Chalkboss
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 184
From: California
Default

Another data point, 87 AT I get 20-22 on the freeway, around 65-70mph. Long gears. Tons of variables to account for your slightly low mpg. Biggest might be your driving style. Subtle changes in throttle application result in big mpg changes. I know cause I drive many miles for work and play around with rental cars mpg indicators and watch how it changes with speed or driving style.
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:19 PM
  #9  
Leon Speed's Avatar
Leon Speed
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 3
From: Germany
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
I get 11-12 mpg. Must be that 2.73 rear end, lots of revs.
Yeah but that is in Greg's 12 liter right?
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:23 PM
  #10  
killav's Avatar
killav
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 8
From: North Richland Hills, TX
Default

I still get 19 to 19.5 on the highway if I don't get into the turbo at all for extended times (no fun in that!). I can drop that down to single digits on our fun runs keeping the turbo on full boil....
Old 10-04-2013 | 01:07 AM
  #11  
gearz's Avatar
gearz
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 247
Likes: 2
From: The Mountains, WA
Default

My '88 with those loping 2.20 gears rewards me with a consistent 20mpg at 70mph on road trips. I really can't complain too much considering what a joy it is to drive.
Old 10-04-2013 | 03:37 AM
  #12  
The Forgotten On's Avatar
The Forgotten On
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 4,978
Likes: 321
From: Thousand Oaks California
Default

I get 22 combined city/highway in my 81 ( yes I only have half the valves) but my injectors are 24lb'ers.
I rev it and use the fuel enrichment constantly. Could get way better if I could stay at 70mph... but the loud pedal is just too tempting.
Old 10-04-2013 | 10:00 AM
  #13  
mi650's Avatar
mi650
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 419
Likes: 2
From: MI
Default

Wow!! Some of you guys are getting some seriously bad mileage!!

Granted, I have the 4.7, but I get 24.5 on the freeway, and I don't shy away from the accelerator. '84 5 speed, btw.
Old 10-04-2013 | 10:08 AM
  #14  
frankle951's Avatar
frankle951
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Default

My 86.5 gets about 19 mpg on highway, I think it's good for the age of the car, it's a automatic, but I do have a 1987 928S4 trans in my 1986.5 and now I get about 21 to 23 mpg at 75 mph, tach around at 2000 rpm.
Old 10-04-2013 | 10:24 AM
  #15  
LT Texan's Avatar
LT Texan
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,236
Likes: 5
From: Austin, TX
Default

I can get 21-22mpg on the highway if I keep it at 65-70.

At 80-85, I get 18-19.

Kept good records of this on my August round trip from NY to San Antone.

The short rearend gearing is stock.

Have a 4.7 Euro S bottom end and heads.

Cams are stock '78 (euroS' left snout broke off)

Induction is stock '78 CIS. ('86 EuroS is in boxes)


Quick Reply: Low fuel economy



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:08 PM.