Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Closing my open crankcase ventilation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2013, 02:00 PM
  #16  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hold On
I did battle with the exact setup you are running. I tried a catch can, baffles, vents and several other means to control oil. When that engine gets on boost, the oil return setup is overwhelmed. I vented back into the intake and that became a nightmare of fouled plugs, oil soaked intake and lots of pinging detonation from the oil reducing the octane. After a couple years of trial and error, I finally installed the ProVent seperator inline with the 928MS fittings. The drain T into the front oil drain tube and the vent line running into the exhaust just aft of the Y pipe. It is the best solution I have come up with. Engine runs clean, plugs are good, minimal oil mist and no blue smoke from tailpipe.
If the hoses are not sized right, that setup theoretically runs the risk of the exhaust slash cut tube creating enough vacuum and the crankcase generating enough pressure to lift oil from the pan. Theoretically only, sounds like it's not happening with your setup. If it works with your setup, then it works.

Every hot rodded engine has slightly different problems and require slightly different solutions. That's why it's in my opinion very important to understand exactly what is happening with each particular engine configuration when trying to patch the 928 crankcase ventilation.
Old 09-09-2013, 05:41 PM
  #17  
robot808
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
robot808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
You on the other hand run a mongrel and this it is what is- a bit of everything so do the best that you can.

Regards

Fred
Fred, it's not really a bit of everything. It's simply an 82 with a 928MS supercharger kit. I just want to see if I can improve on one facet of it.
Old 09-09-2013, 06:23 PM
  #18  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,885
Received 740 Likes on 594 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robot808
Fred, it's not really a bit of everything. It's simply an 82 with a 928MS supercharger kit. I just want to see if I can improve on one facet of it.
Bob,

I think you can and it will not take too much to achieve if you are mechanically sound. Go for a good primary separation baffle along the lines I indicated, plumb that to a pro vent separator assuming there is space to get the plumbing geometry & ensure you have a vent 1 inch diameter to the pro vent. You can consider routing the gas outlet back to the inlet wiht a similar diameter pipe and I suspect you should find that the resulting emissions will not foul anything but check carefully. On the S4 I was concerned it might foul the MAF hotwire so I route the vent pipe to the under side of the car in the hope that the air below the car might induce some kind of venturi effect to help evacuation a tad but that is probably wishful thinking. Even so I have yet to see any traces of oil coming from that vent. The oil drain connection from the pro vent I run back to a little catch bottle and so far it has caught only a few drops of oil so I reckon John Kuhn's internal baffle design works quite well and he designed that with his twin turbo system in mind. I believe Doc Brown also has an offering in this field.

If I feel I need to take this further I may try something along the lines of what Colin does with the vac pump- I suspect that is an elegant solution but a bit more pricey and more bits to wear out so you need a really good pump kit if you go that route.
Old 09-09-2013, 07:10 PM
  #19  
robot808
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
robot808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Alan,
I love when you comment on my threads. Period.

Fred,
Thank you. I already have a MS baffle installed, as well as a seperator in the filler, so I'm really concentrating on the supplementing what I already have. Means finding the right catch can and a place to put the fumes. I think the Provent idea is a great one.

Hold on,
Did you have the Provent when you had your vent going back to the intake? Or had you moved away from the intake by the time you got your Provent?

Tuomo,
I really like your idea. It sounds like a factory type solution to me. May try that, but I would like to hear if Hold on had tried anything similar.
Also, good advice about understanding the system. Makes a lot of sense.
Although I know very little about this, I believe I'm capable of understanding any system. It may take me a little while, but ultimately I'll get it.
So, I'm just looking for the best idea. Even if it is a bit complex, I'll figure it out.
Old 09-10-2013, 12:12 PM
  #20  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Bob, some how your picture looks a little different to me.

Have you tried hosing it like this:
Attached Images  
Old 09-10-2013, 12:33 PM
  #21  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

And where does the brake booster connect to now then?
Old 09-10-2013, 01:08 PM
  #22  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,885
Received 740 Likes on 594 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robot808

Fred,
Thank you. I already have a MS baffle installed, as well as a seperator in the filler, so I'm really concentrating on the supplementing what I already have. Means finding the right catch can and a place to put the fumes. I think the Provent idea is a great one.

Hold on,
Did you have the Provent when you had your vent going back to the intake? Or had you moved away from the intake by the time you got your Provent?

.
Bob,

I made the mistake of thinking that when I "upgraded" the breather system of my S4 motor to the GTS system it was a positive thing to do- I think we have established that was not a good thing and explains to some extent why my oil consumption incrreased. Having looked a various solutions I wanted to try something to see if I could get things under control and listened to various pieces of advice and tips etc. With hindsight I should have installed the Pro Vent and nothing else to test for impact and then gone to stage two to rty the upgraded baffle- either way I went for broke and installed the lot in one hit. for sure there has been oil consumption improvement although just how much is stlll debatable.

I did not try the Pro Vent looped into the stock system and was a bit wary about increasing the breathing capacity and then recycling back vapours that may contain oil upstream of the air filter.

Ultimately I would like a system that recycles the vapours rather than vents them directly but my programme is to improve oil consumption and then work out how make it "greener" if possible.

I still have a few more tests to do when the cooler weather returns but then I do not have to worry about the smog ***** taking me to the cleaners.

I am interested to learn how my Cayenne Turbo motor deals with this aspect. I have a feeling it may compress/recycle the vapours to permit recycle under full boost but the jury is still out on that one.

Regards

Fred
Old 09-10-2013, 01:09 PM
  #23  
Hold On
Rennlist Member
 
Hold On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: El Mirage, Arizona
Posts: 1,044
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hold On
I did battle with the exact setup you are running. I tried a catch can, baffles, vents and several other means to control oil. When that engine gets on boost, the oil return setup is overwhelmed. I vented back into the intake and that became a nightmare of fouled plugs, oil soaked intake and lots of pinging detonation from the oil reducing the octane. After a couple years of trial and error, I finally installed the ProVent seperator inline with the 928MS fittings. The drain T into the front oil drain tube and the vent line running into the exhaust just aft of the Y pipe. It is the best solution I have come up with. Engine runs clean, plugs are good, minimal oil mist and no blue smoke from tailpipe.
Here is a picture of setup. Drain in bottom of ProVent goes into stock oil drain hose going back into oil pan. Vent runs down driver side of engine ,down to fitting welded to Y pipe then gets sent out the back door. No oil smell in cockpit and no oil film in intake system.

Last edited by Hold On; 01-14-2015 at 06:07 PM.
Old 09-10-2013, 01:18 PM
  #24  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,885
Received 740 Likes on 594 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hold On
Here is a picture of setup. Drain in bottom of ProVent goes into stock oil drain hose going back into oil pan. Vent runs down driver side of engine ,down to fitting welded to Y pipe then gets sent out the back door. No oil smell in cockpit and no oil film in intake system.
Nice clean engine bay but is that a pressure gauge I see on the fuel rail?

Suggest you ask Randy if he thinks that is a good thing!

Regards

Fred
Old 09-10-2013, 01:43 PM
  #25  
Hold On
Rennlist Member
 
Hold On's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: El Mirage, Arizona
Posts: 1,044
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Yes that is a pressure guage. Most of us try to avoid Randy like the plague.
Old 09-10-2013, 02:33 PM
  #26  
polecat702
Vegas, Baby!
Rennlist Member


 
polecat702's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: far away
Posts: 11,536
Received 381 Likes on 163 Posts
Default

I've run cross country and back with Hold On, more than once. His car doesn't lay a smoke screen, or really use much more fuel than my 87 or 89 did. His car is quicker though. Trust his advice, his set up works!

It's so well engineered that it still performed with a broken internal SC belt.
Old 09-10-2013, 02:58 PM
  #27  
robot808
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
robot808's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Elmhurst, IL
Posts: 2,483
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Carl,
Thanks for jumping in on this. No, my OC12 had no PCV valve, and had the vent line running to SC intake tube.
Looking at that spot on the spider, I've got a line to the brake booster, and one that goes to the U under the throttle body (at least I think that's where it goes).
So, I have the same question as Colin.

Hold on, that is beautiful man.
Old 09-10-2013, 02:59 PM
  #28  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

One of the prettiest installs of our kit that I've seen. Very well done. Good job.
Old 09-10-2013, 03:03 PM
  #29  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Thanks for jumping in on this. No, my OC12 had no PCV valve, and had the vent line running to SC intake tube.
Looking at that spot on the spider, I've got a line to the brake booster, and one that goes to the U under the throttle body (at least I think that's where it goes).
That's what I was worried about. That line that goes under the U to the "throttle body" may be a direct path from the pressurized plenum to crankcase. If you are describing the one I am thinking about, our instructions show how to remove it and we provide a plug to cap it off.
Old 09-10-2013, 03:09 PM
  #30  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

The Wye in the line has been turned in this picture up-and-down, and the large side connected to the oil separator line to re-breath crankcase gases, and the lower part of the Wye (with the venturi in it) is connected to the brake booster per OEM. This is an L-Jet car.
Attached Images  


Quick Reply: Closing my open crankcase ventilation



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:52 AM.