Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

limits of auto trans?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2013, 01:04 PM
  #16  
rgs944
Drifting
 
rgs944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 3,334
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ledee416
interesting. since I definitely will not be using a Porsche engine, I am not too concerned with that aspect. I really want to make a 928 monster, but there doesnt seem to be a convincing argument for it.

I have never owned an auto high hp car that was fun to drive in corners and such. That is my main goal. I would like to be able to run laps on an N-Ring type track and have some fun. I am just not convinced that an auto trans will get me there. The whole paddle shifting idea seems pretty cool though. I just wonder how well the paddle shifter kit will work.
I think you are starting with the wrong platform. Buy a 914 and put a 400HP V8 in it. Update the brakes and susupension and that will give you one of the fastest track machines you can get for the money. There is no substitute for a mid engine low center of gravity car on the track. It really is too bad Porsche ruined the 914 by putting a gutless VW engine in it for the mass market.
Old 02-22-2013, 01:07 PM
  #17  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rgs944
it just limits your fun a little bit.
I would counter it forces you to learn more....
Old 02-22-2013, 01:09 PM
  #18  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ledee416
interesting. since I definitely will not be using a Porsche engine, I am not too concerned with that aspect. I really want to make a 928 monster, but there doesnt seem to be a convincing argument for it.
That's your conclusion, limited by your own decisions.

Originally Posted by ledee416
I have never owned an auto high hp car that was fun to drive in corners and such. That is my main goal. I would like to be able to run laps on an N-Ring type track and have some fun. I am just not convinced that an auto trans will get me there. The whole paddle shifting idea seems pretty cool though. I just wonder how well the paddle shifter kit will work.
Fun in corners is not a gearbox issue, it, IMHO, is 75% driver capability, 25% vehicle capability.
Old 02-22-2013, 01:47 PM
  #19  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,555
Received 2,173 Likes on 1,229 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
Fun in corners is not a gearbox issue, it, IMHO, is 75% driver capability, 25% vehicle capability.
+1
Sometimes lack of vehicle capability adds to the enjoyment.

The best cars in the corners are low(er) HP, and perfectly balanced.

See my avatar, that is Jeremy Clarkson explaining why the Toyobaru BRZ is quite possibly one of the most fun cars to drive in a very long time. If you could somehow give it 500hp without unbalancing the car (and adding weight), it would ruin it.

This coming from the guy that screams "POWER!!!!" every chance he gets.
Old 02-22-2013, 02:40 PM
  #20  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,270
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
+1
Sometimes lack of vehicle capability adds to the enjoyment.

The best cars in the corners are low(er) HP, and perfectly balanced.

See my avatar, that is Jeremy Clarkson explaining why the Toyobaru BRZ is quite possibly one of the most fun cars to drive in a very long time. If you could somehow give it 500hp without unbalancing the car (and adding weight), it would ruin it.

This coming from the guy that screams "POWER!!!!" every chance he gets.
hacker is 1,000,000% right......I own an FRS......the single best handling street car I have ever driven on track......a large part of the fun is it isn't scary..... I have driven E92 M3 (414hp) and C6 Z06 (505hp) along with racers between spec miata to 400hp..... With just a couple simple mods (mostly tires and brakes) the FRS would be the ultimate drive to the track and have fun vehicle.....
Old 02-22-2013, 02:55 PM
  #21  
Carl Fausett
Developer
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

I side with Mark Donahue on this one... and the epic 917-30. I want the power, and perfect setup and balance. It doesn't have to be either-or. It can be both.

That's what I want, mind you, not what I have. Not yet - but we try.
Old 02-22-2013, 04:07 PM
  #22  
ledee416
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ledee416's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Lake Park, Georgia
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Speedtoys
That's your conclusion, limited by your own decisions.



Fun in corners is not a gearbox issue, it, IMHO, is 75% driver capability, 25% vehicle capability.
I was referring to the ability to change gears going into corners.
Old 02-22-2013, 04:37 PM
  #23  
Cosmo Kramer
Rennlist Member
 
Cosmo Kramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,655
Received 176 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Check out Iceman's videos passing Corvettes with his old 4.7 automatic estate racer. Autos do just fine at the track if you know how to drive them.
Old 02-22-2013, 05:33 PM
  #24  
GregBBRD
Former Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,230
Received 2,474 Likes on 1,468 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
The automatic is good for 600-ish horsepower (as seen with Andy's GTS), while the 5-speed is good up to 900 CHP (in Carl's racer).

Not sure what a muscle-car shift kit is- different torque converter? Yes, those are available. Hurst quarter stick shifters? No, not available.

I'm not aware of anyone with a paddle-shifted 928.

Switching a manual into an auto is a giant pain in the ***. Lots of threads about it in the archives.


Were I going down this road, I would start with a 5-speed car and do the LSx/Dinsbox conversion.
Keep in mind that Andy's automatic is a far cry from stock....and I had it out, several times, to make it work the way it does. Hell, I had it out 3 times before I figured out the proper convertor. That engine made a "real" 500 ft. lbs. (DTS engine dyno at steady state load, not a one time spin-up, through the rpm range on a Dream-O-Meter) and I knew, at the time, that we could not have installed that engine in front of a 5 speed.

That "900hp" engine had something very "inconsistant" (I'm being magnanimous, these days) about it...wouldn't "pull" 5th gear......either at Bonneville or when Mark Anderson drove it.

If you've ever tried to put "a real" 500 ft. lbs. through any "style" 928 clutch, the clutch input shaft, and the torque tube....you would know that nothing there will "handle" than amount of torque, for "extended" periods of time. And even once those problems are solved....there's literally "truck loads" (off road racing) of data about how much power those stock C/V joints and axles will handle.

Whenever any particular vehicle "type" gets modified, there are always "limits" to what the chassis, the brakes, and the drivetrain will handle.

I feel very "limited" in what I can "feed" through the 928 with a manual transmission, right now.....

Yes, I know that there are people, out there, that think or claim to be making big horsepower and big torque out of the 928 engine....with the only proof being a "Dream-O-Meter" dyno chart.

But when the time comes to prove it, they suddenly have a 900hp engine that won't go over 205mph.

What does that "Dream-O-Meter" dyno chart mean when that happens?

Not much.

Last edited by GregBBRD; 02-22-2013 at 07:38 PM.
Old 02-23-2013, 04:06 AM
  #25  
The Forgotten On
Rennlist Member
 
The Forgotten On's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Thousand Oaks California
Posts: 4,964
Received 316 Likes on 263 Posts
Default

do any of you guys have any idea what amount of power a 3 speed auto could handle? I just want to know the limits so I don't break something and have to put a new one in.
Old 02-23-2013, 02:18 PM
  #26  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ledee416
I was referring to the ability to change gears going into corners.

That's where that 75% comes from.

You don't do that.

Cornering is steady state stuff. Your braking and shifting is done before turn in to have the car settled from entrance to exit.


Anything else is racecraft, and you're not going to be doing that.


And oh ya..WHEN you change gears..."click"..and it's done...you only need 2 of em.
Old 02-23-2013, 02:22 PM
  #27  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

While I concur with Jeff that all shifting is done before the corner, I do not enjoy driving an auto on the track near as much as a manual.......
Old 02-23-2013, 02:42 PM
  #28  
Speedtoys
Rennlist Member
 
Speedtoys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boulder Creek, CA
Posts: 13,582
Received 1,034 Likes on 623 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lizard931
While I concur with Jeff that all shifting is done before the corner, I do not enjoy driving an auto on the track near as much as a manual.......
And I agree with you 100%.

But at the power levels hes shooting for, its his only stable option.

Just..I appreciate he's trying, but he owns all the wrong kit for his big dreams here...and even if he did, he wants to go about it the hard way...which he is welcome to do.

But when it ends up another "Parts for sale from my 10yr GM conversion project.." it'll be sad.

A blown 4.7 would blow his mind, and well, work.



Quick Reply: limits of auto trans?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:01 AM.