Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

The New 928 Boat Anchor.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2013, 06:22 PM
  #46  
Emickelsen
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Emickelsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bakersfield, Ca.
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your bolts are missing these under them: 911 332 191 00
I studied the diagrams a little more, and I don't think the '83 had those. I think those started in the '85 model.
Old 01-14-2013, 06:42 PM
  #47  
Mark Anderson
The Parts Whisperer
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Mark Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Anaheim Ca
Posts: 7,070
Received 375 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Emickelsen

SOOOOOO, back to the differential. Could that have damaged the internal workings, or is that a seperate issue? AND can the differential be worked on with the tranny IN the car? I would imagine not.
Yes you can remove the diff with the trans still in the car.
Old 01-14-2013, 07:15 PM
  #48  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,149
Received 367 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Emickelsen
Good eye indeed. VERY interesting however. I changed nothing. Same bolts and everything else that I took off went right back on. And yes, I had to rotate the axles to get them off and on. They weren't there before, yet that obviously makes sense. I don't remember seeing anything in the WSM about it either.

SOOOOOO, back to the differential. Could that have damaged the internal workings, or is that a seperate issue? AND can the differential be worked on with the tranny IN the car? I would imagine not.
Those look like newer CV joints.
They are not?
I'd like to compare width of that CV joint disk with you.

Its great news that the limit of the damage is this, by the way!!!!
You can keep rolling with only minor rework.
Old 01-15-2013, 12:51 PM
  #49  
Emickelsen
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Emickelsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bakersfield, Ca.
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Landseer
Those look like newer CV joints.
They are not?
I'd like to compare width of that CV joint disk with you.

Its great news that the limit of the damage is this, by the way!!!!
You can keep rolling with only minor rework.
Just the CV joint itself, the black part minus the bolt plate on the axle and the differential flange is 1.39". I can't confirm that they are the standard/correct joints for that particular car. All I know is they are the ones that were there when I bought the car, and the same ones I put back on. The only things that were changed were the CV boot's. I DID pressure wash them prior to doing the boots to get the 1/4 inch of grime off. Kookey. Still doesn't explain why it wasn't scraping before I did the boot job.

Mark, are you saying that the differential seems to be malfunctioning, and the wheels should turn the oppisite direction?
Old 01-15-2013, 09:14 PM
  #50  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 339 Likes on 245 Posts
Default

Were the bolts tight or loose?
Old 01-16-2013, 05:15 AM
  #51  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,149
Received 367 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Am wondering if your bolts did most of the damage years ago, then you noticed it recently doing a tad more damage because you cleaned and torqued them, getting them a bit deeper than they already were?


84 mounted to G28-07 transaxle (installed with later grease backing caps against trans flange)
85-on CV shown loose

84 style inner CV is about 1 7/8 inches wide.
Later style (showing 86) is sub 1 1/2.

I removed one of the long 84 bolts to contrast it with the 86 bolt.
Attached Images   
Old 01-16-2013, 12:56 PM
  #52  
Emickelsen
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Emickelsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bakersfield, Ca.
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
Were the bolts tight or loose?
They were pretty tight.

Am wondering if your bolts did most of the damage years ago, then you noticed it recently doing a tad more damage because you cleaned and torqued them, getting them a bit deeper than they already were?


84 mounted to G28-07 transaxle (installed with later grease backing caps against trans flange)
85-on CV shown loose

84 style inner CV is about 1 7/8 inches wide.
Later style (showing 86) is sub 1 1/2.

I removed one of the long 84 bolts to contrast it with the 86 bolt.
Interesting theory, and the only one that really makes any sense at all. Those grooves are close to an 1/8' deep. I would think that would make more noise than what I heard. I guess I could have tourqued those bolts down just a little more to recut those grooves.

The joint I have is definetly the one on top (bolted to the car). Maybe all the extra pounding and scraping was enough to send the spider gears over the top. Guess I just have to rely on Occam's razor for this one. Either way, I'm back to my original dilema, what to do with the car. I still haven't forgotten about your offer IcemanG17, and thanks by the way.
Old 01-16-2013, 12:58 PM
  #53  
911 Crazy
SPAM addict
Rennlist Member
 
911 Crazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Acadia National Park, Northeast Harbor, Maine
Posts: 30,276
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevinlieb
Take a deep breath. Put it under the cover for a while and reflect. Don't do anything rash. Maybe you want to loan the chainsaw you used to cut the xmas tree down to a neighbor for a while. Then consider your options.

Every time I hit that entrance ramp to the highway, hear that engine roar and feel those tires grip the road I remember why I deal with the hardships of classic car ownership.
Fantastically said! Had mine for 330k miles. Good luck!
Old 01-16-2013, 07:30 PM
  #54  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,149
Received 367 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Emickelsen
They were pretty tight.



Interesting theory, and the only one that really makes any sense at all. Those grooves are close to an 1/8' deep. I would think that would make more noise than what I heard. I guess I could have tourqued those bolts down just a little more to recut those grooves.

The joint I have is definetly the one on top (bolted to the car). Maybe all the extra pounding and scraping was enough to send the spider gears over the top. Guess I just have to rely on Occam's razor for this one. Either way, I'm back to my original dilema, what to do with the car. I still haven't forgotten about your offer IcemanG17, and thanks by the way.
I think you definitely have the narrow post 84 ones. They are about the same width as your measurement, under 1 1/2" but just look different because of the optional caps.

The car should be fine with new short bolts, shouldn't it?



Quick Reply: The New 928 Boat Anchor.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:34 PM.