Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Front Bilsteins. Later Spring length?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 05:16 PM
  #1  
Landseer's Avatar
Landseer
Thread Starter
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,162
Likes: 383
From: Johnson City, TN
Default Front Bilsteins. Later Spring length?

928 Intl sells front Bilstein, one model good for all years.

Footnote says -- can be used on 78 thru 84, but you need to use the short springs from later cars.

Did springs change beginning 85?


Did the shocks or the adjuster collars change from the original sport suspension Bilsteins installed on my 84 car?

( the replacement shocks are already on the car, recent, probably same set as 928 Intl is selling --- but ride height has been awfully high --- trying to sort out options here)
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 06:22 PM
  #2  
Landseer's Avatar
Landseer
Thread Starter
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,162
Likes: 383
From: Johnson City, TN
Default

Hoping I can use 84 springs.
I have 86.5 springs too, but they measure the same length.

Here's the bilstein dimensions I'm working with.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Bilstein length.jpg (132.3 KB, 1947 views)
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 07:42 PM
  #3  
jheis's Avatar
jheis
Burning Brakes
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 29
From: Wine Country, CA
Default

I originally had fixed height (non-adjustable) Bilsteins on the front of my '82 with the "competition package." One of the shocks failed & I had to replace them with height adjustable Bilsteins (like you have).

With the stock springs, the front ride height went up about an inch - even with the adjusters cranked all the way down. I was told that I had to use S4 springs with the height adjustable Bilsteins. Installed a pair of Weltmeister S4 springs & problem solved.

The WSM is not much help on this matter, using "tolerance group" rather than length to identify the various springs.

They do say (page 40 -49) that:

"Springs with approx. 200 N more force at a standard test length (e.g. tolerance group II springs as opposed to group I) increase the height of the front axle by approx. 5 -15 mm."

It goes on to say that:

"If Boge dampers are replaced by Bilstein dampers .... the front axle is raised by approx. 10 mm because of the gas pressure in the latter dampers."

The WSM recommends the use of the "white/green" springs with the Bilstein front shocks.

Don't know if this helps. It was kind of trial by error for me. The Weltmeister "S4" springs worked fine, but I ultimately did the S4 front suspension and brake conversion on my '82 (mainly for the brakes).

James
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 07:58 PM
  #4  
Mrmerlin's Avatar
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 31,151
Likes: 4,152
From: Philly PA
Default

I wasnt aware that there are different spring lengths but rather different spring tensions fitted to different years for AC and non AC ,
the markings are different color stripes on the springs,
both springs should have the same color striping
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2012 | 08:03 PM
  #5  
Landseer's Avatar
Landseer
Thread Starter
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,162
Likes: 383
From: Johnson City, TN
Default

James, thanks for that info, explains what I'm finding.
Stan, I thought the same, maybe its rates not length.

84 has three green stripes.

86.5 parts car with std boge ---somewhat corroded springs. don't see stripes.

Am in process of shifting to full later suspension, was going to keep 84 sport springs.
Now, not so sure. Probably need to use the later ones.

Maybe I can use the 86.5 springs and also whack a coil or two off to get the low ride height I'm looking for.



BTW, Bilstein collars are brand specific, very different from standard collars.
And it appears Bilstein front are different than back.

I also need to replace the front Bilstein adjusters, cut off last weekend.

Last edited by Landseer; Nov 11, 2012 at 08:25 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 02:33 AM
  #6  
soontobered84's Avatar
soontobered84
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 344
From: Texas
Default

The non adjustable front springs are longer (read: have one extra coil) than the adjustable front springs. I think what Intl is saying is that you must use the adjustable front spring length when using the height adjustable Bilsteins else your car will look like a U-boat. (high in the front compared to the back)
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 05:02 AM
  #7  
Landseer's Avatar
Landseer
Thread Starter
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,162
Likes: 383
From: Johnson City, TN
Default

Do you know what year or model had adjustable springs, that is, with one less coil?

I've got 84 3 stripe originals next to 86.5 originals and they have same coil count.

Must be I need later ones?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 07:56 AM
  #8  
Landseer's Avatar
Landseer
Thread Starter
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,162
Likes: 383
From: Johnson City, TN
Default

The 86.5 springs in my garage have 3 brown marks.
The 84 Euro springs have 3 green marks.


Plenty of confusing info in the WSM, as-referenced by James (above) --

Looks like I'd be better off with softer white/green, though the measurement is made at a different compressed length.

Time to improvise. Not sure how. Maybe whack the brown ones and hope for the best.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Adjustable spring chart.jpg (132.7 KB, 2160 views)
File Type: jpg
Bilstein notes from wsm.jpg (45.6 KB, 1739 views)
File Type: jpg
green white notes from wsm.jpg (39.4 KB, 2027 views)
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 09:12 AM
  #9  
LT Texan's Avatar
LT Texan
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,278
Likes: 16
From: Austin, TX
Default

Some have cut a coil off the stock spring.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 12:49 PM
  #10  
Tom in Austin's Avatar
Tom in Austin
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,269
Likes: 5
From: Deep in the Heart of Texas!
Default

Is it correct to conclude from the WSM excerpts that all cars from "86 onward" have brown springs, since Porsche went to Boge for both std and M474 applications?

I started a spring rate thread last week and Roger pointed out that GTs had optional sport springs, but all other S4 and newer in USA were same spring rate, IIRC ... now I wonder if the GT sport springs are in the 1,2 or 3 brown grouping for "86 onward" ... or maybe some other color category?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 01:36 PM
  #11  
soontobered84's Avatar
soontobered84
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 344
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Landseer
Do you know what year or model had adjustable springs, that is, with one less coil?

I've got 84 3 stripe originals next to 86.5 originals and they have same coil count.

Must be I need later ones?
No. You have springs from an adjustable front end. IIRC, '84 is the year that Porsche went to adjustable height front.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 02:16 PM
  #12  
85euro928's Avatar
85euro928
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 88
From: Hampster Bays, LI
Default

Landseer,
What are your ride heights? The reason I'm asking is that I have the same set up, Bilsteins w/ 3 green marks on the springs. My ride heights are 165 front (with the adjuster all the way down) and 170 back, but my ride height in the front still "looks" to be about an inch too high. In speaking with the group at Frenzy the consensus was that maybe the front springs had been changed at one time or another but I took the shocks off and sent them back to Bilstein to be rebuilt and there was no sign they had ever been taken apart. I'd really like to get the front down if possible and am hoping you find an answer as I didn't.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 02:31 PM
  #13  
GlenL's Avatar
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,742
Likes: 78
From: Minneapolis
Default

Originally Posted by soontobered84
'84 is the year that Porsche went to adjustable height front.
...on all 928s.

Simplified: If you've got non-adjustable front shocks then you need the later springs.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 08:05 PM
  #14  
Landseer's Avatar
Landseer
Thread Starter
Race Director
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,162
Likes: 383
From: Johnson City, TN
Default

Not sure of the ride height, its getting the S4 A Arms and brakes right now.

But here is the stance, front settled, adjusters nearly fully down.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
84 Euro.jpg (196.3 KB, 2058 views)
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 08:48 PM
  #15  
soontobered84's Avatar
soontobered84
Rennlist Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 344
From: Texas
Default

I am running Konis on all my cars, but your ride height "looks" to be about an inch higher than my '89 which has stock springs and has plenty of adjustment room left to be lowered. Any possibility that you have the adjustment nut upside down on the shock?
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:41 AM.